From: pelle@svans.los

A REAL DISGRACE took place at the United Nations yesterday — Not one,
not two, but three very sinister events! First, the escalator going up
to the Main Speaking Floor came to a screeching halt. It stopped on a
dime. It’s amazing that Melania and I didn’t fall forward onto the sharp edges of these steel steps, face first. It was only that we were each
holding the handrail tightly or, it would have been a disaster. This was absolutely sabotage, as noted by a day’s earlier “post” in The London Times that said UN workers “joked about turning off an escalator.” The people that did it should be arrested! Then, as I stood before a
Television crowd of millions of people all over the World, and important Leaders in the Hall, my teleprompter didn’t work. It was stone cold
dark. I immediately thought to myself, “Wow, first the escalator event,
and now a bad teleprompter. What kind of a place is this?” I then
proceeded to make a Speech without a teleprompter, which kicked in about
15 minutes later. The good news is the Speech has gotten fantastic
reviews. Maybe they appreciated the fact that very few people could have
done what I did. And third, after making the Speech, I was told that the
sound was completely off in the Auditorium where the Speech was made,
that World Leaders, unless they used the interpreters’ earpieces,
couldn’t hear a thing. The first person I saw at the conclusion of the
Speech was Melania, who was sitting right up front. I said, “How did I
do?” And she said, “I couldn’t hear a word you said.” This wasn’t a coincidence, this was triple sabotage at the UN. They ought to be
ashamed of themselves. I’m sending a copy of this letter to the
Secretary General, and I demand an immediate investigation. No wonder
the United Nations hasn’t been able to do the job that they were put in existence to do. All security tapes at the escalator should be saved, especially the emergency stop button. The Secret Service is involved.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115261466629181518

If you made it to the end, congrats. Donald has too much time on his
small hands.

--
"Cough cough"
-- Suzanne Lenglen

--- SoupGate-Linux v1.05
* Origin: Dragon's Lair ---:- FidoNet<>Usenet Gateway -:--- (3:633/10)

From: nospam@home.net

On 9/25/2025 12:18 PM, Pelle Svanslös wrote:

A REAL DISGRACE took place at the United Nations yesterday — Not one,
not two, but three very sinister events! First, the escalator going up
to the Main Speaking Floor came to a screeching halt. It stopped on a
dime. It’s amazing that Melania and I didn’t fall forward onto the sharp edges of these steel steps, face first. It was only that we were each
holding the handrail tightly or, it would have been a disaster. This was absolutely sabotage, as noted by a day’s earlier “post” in The London Times that said UN workers “joked about turning off an escalator.” The people that did it should be arrested! Then, as I stood before a
Television crowd of millions of people all over the World, and important Leaders in the Hall, my teleprompter didn’t work. It was stone cold
dark. I immediately thought to myself, “Wow, first the escalator event,
and now a bad teleprompter. What kind of a place is this?” I then
proceeded to make a Speech without a teleprompter, which kicked in about
15 minutes later. The good news is the Speech has gotten fantastic
reviews. Maybe they appreciated the fact that very few people could have
done what I did. And third, after making the Speech, I was told that the sound was completely off in the Auditorium where the Speech was made,
that World Leaders, unless they used the interpreters’ earpieces, couldn’t hear a thing. The first person I saw at the conclusion of the Speech was Melania, who was sitting right up front. I said, “How did I do?” And she said, “I couldn’t hear a word you said.” This wasn’t a coincidence, this was triple sabotage at the UN. They ought to be
ashamed of themselves. I’m sending a copy of this letter to the
Secretary General, and I demand an immediate investigation. No wonder
the United Nations hasn’t been able to do the job that they were put in existence to do. All security tapes at the escalator should be saved, especially the emergency stop button. The Secret Service is involved.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115261466629181518

If you made it to the end, congrats. Donald has too much time on his
small hands.

You got to give it to Trump, he does have brass balls.
--
---------------
Scall5

--- SoupGate-Linux v1.05
* Origin: Dragon's Lair ---:- FidoNet<>Usenet Gateway -:--- (3:633/10)

From: skriptis@post.t-com.hr

Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

On 9/25/25 7:44 PM, jdeluise wrote:> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> > >>>> The country is being run by an unashamedly authoritarian masculine>> leadership cadre. Maybe we'd have to go back to Andrew Jackson to see>> a similarly forceful leader.

WRT hands, have you ever seen Xi's?>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/14/asia/gallery/xi-jinping>>>> Napoleon complex, but with hand-size?> > I guess Trump's masculine... presuming that includes chronic > indecisiveness, emotional neediness, and

pathological vanity. The > whininess alone is a disqualifier for me. But hey, you're entitled to > your opinion!So..."The country is being run by an unashamedly authoritarian masculineleadership cadre. Maybe we'd have to go back to Andrew Jackson to
seea similarly forceful leader."sounded too much like praise, j?So you are saying we're *not* being run by "an unashamedly authoritarian masculine leadership cadre"?-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Open the
pod bay doors, HAL."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



I think this is a good read for you.


https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/trump-feminine-speaking-style-214391/


Basically if this is true it could mean Trump has established himself as a woman in our relationship to him, he talks but we like him not what he's saying but for what he is, and we don't really pay attention to what he's saying?



Maybe a Pelle, expert on genders could say a word here?


--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Linux v1.05
* Origin: Dragon's Lair ---:- FidoNet<>Usenet Gateway -:--- (3:633/10)

From: skriptis@post.t-com.hr

jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> On 9/25/25 9:38 PM, *skriptis wrote:>> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>>> On 9/25/25 7:44 PM, jdeluise wrote:> Sawfish >>> <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> > >>>> The country is being >>> run by

an unashamedly authoritarian masculine>> leadership >>> cadre. Maybe we'd have to go back to Andrew Jackson to see>> a >>> similarly forceful leader.>>>> WRT hands, have you ever seen >>> Xi's?>>>> >>> https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/14/asia/gallery/xi-
jinping>>>> >>> Napoleon complex, but with hand-size?> > I guess Trump's >>> masculine... presuming that includes chronic > indecisiveness, >>> emotional neediness, and pathological vanity. The > whininess >>> alone is a disqualifier for me. But hey,
you're entitled to > >>> your opinion!So..."The country is being run by an unashamedly >>> authoritarian masculineleadership cadre. Maybe we'd have to go >>> back to Andrew Jackson to seea similarly forceful >>> leader."sounded too much like praise, j?So
you are saying >>> we're *not* being run by "an unashamedly authoritarian >>> masculine leadership cadre"?-- >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Open >>> the pod bay doors, >>> HAL."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>> I think this is a good read for you.>> https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/trump-feminine-speaking-style-214391/>> Basically if this is true it could mean Trump has established>> himself as a
woman in our relationship to him, he talks but we >> like>> him not what he's saying but for what he is, and we don't >> really pay>> attention to what he's saying?>> Maybe a Pelle, expert on genders could say a word here?>> >> Huh.>> I hadn't realized
how masculine Ted Cruz and Dennis Kusinich > are. Boy,> oh boy, was I ever wrong about them!!! Bernie Sanders, too!!!>> Thanks so much, skript! I'm sure glad that someone smart, like a > UC> professor, can definitively set us straight, huh?Makeup, hair
transplants, girdles, shoulder pads... mmm, manly? Must be an Portland thing.




This is a funny topic but I for one do not dismiss this idea.

I feel there's something in it.

In a world that's has been thoroughly feminised, even a macho persona is tainted by the era in which he lives.

He has to, sort of, evolve to maintain success.

So he's not really "macho" per old textbook, but neither is our world anymore.




It's basically like those genetic manipulation of different spices and animals. If science were to recreate mammoth, clone it, they'd probably have to use bits of elephant genome or whatever so it wouldn't be a true mammoth from a bygone era,
technically, but would be very very close to it.


This is it.

Trump is masculine no doubt in his views, resolve, forceful projection etc so Sawfish is right, but he's wrapped it in feminine style, as you jdeluise note, make up, hair transplants, words often, etc so somewhat and partially, it's kinda feminine, and I
do believe it's what makes or made him more visible, palpatable and relatable than for example Ted Cruz who seemed dull?

Not commenting on politics at all.




So the really funny thing is we do treat him as a woman. We don't take him by his words. His fans don't care what he says, basically Trump's words are meaningless?

He says so much and of course something has to contradict the other, but we don't care.

If you like him, you like him.

So yeah, he's like a woman to us.





--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Linux v1.05
* Origin: Dragon's Lair ---:- FidoNet<>Usenet Gateway -:--- (3:633/10)

From: skriptis@post.t-com.hr

jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> writes:> jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> On 9/25/25 9:38 PM, >> *skriptis wrote:>> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in >> message:r>>> On 9/25/25 7:44 PM,

jdeluise wrote:> Sawfish >>> >> <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> > >>>> The country is being >>> >> run by an unashamedly authoritarian masculine>> leadership >>> >> cadre. Maybe we'd have to go back to Andrew Jackson to see>> a >> >>> similarly forceful
leader.>>>> WRT hands, have you ever >> seen >>> Xi's?>>>> >>> >> https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/14/asia/gallery/xi-jinping>>>> >>> >> Napoleon complex, but with hand-size?> > I guess Trump's >>> >> masculine... presuming that includes chronic >
indecisiveness, >> >>> emotional neediness, and pathological vanity. The > >> whininess >>> alone is a disqualifier for me. But hey, you're >> entitled to > >>> your opinion!So..."The country is being run >> by an unashamedly >>> authoritarian
masculineleadership >> cadre. Maybe we'd have to go >>> back to Andrew Jackson to seea >> similarly forceful >>> leader."sounded too much like praise, >> j?So you are saying >>> we're *not* being run by "an >> unashamedly authoritarian >>> masculine
leadership cadre"?-- >> >>> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Open >> >>> the pod bay doors, >>> >> HAL."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>> >> I think this is a good
read for you.>> >> https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/trump-feminine-speaking-style-214391/>> >> Basically if this is true it could mean Trump has established>> >> himself as a woman in our relationship to him, he talks but we >> >> like>>
him not what he's saying but for what he is, and we >> don't >> really pay>> attention to what he's saying?>> Maybe a >> Pelle, expert on genders could say a word here?>> >> Huh.>> I >> hadn't realized how masculine Ted Cruz and Dennis Kusinich > >> are.
Boy,> oh boy, was I ever wrong about them!!! Bernie >> Sanders, too!!!>> Thanks so much, skript! I'm sure glad that >> someone smart, like a > UC> professor, can definitively set us >> straight, huh?Makeup, hair transplants, girdles, shoulder >> pads...
mmm, manly? Must be an Portland thing.>>>>> This is a funny topic but I for one do not dismiss this idea.>> I feel there's something in it.>> In a world that's has been thoroughly feminised, even a macho > persona is tainted by the era in which he lives.>

He has to, sort of, evolve to maintain success.>> So he's not really "macho" per old textbook, but neither is our > world anymore.>>>>> It's basically like those genetic manipulation of different > spices and animals. If science were to recreate

mammoth, clone > it, they'd probably have to use bits of elephant genome or > whatever so it wouldn't be a true mammoth from a bygone era, > technically, but would be very very close to it.>>> This is it.>> Trump is masculine no doubt in his views,
resolve, forceful > projection etc so Sawfish is right, but he's wrapped it in > feminine style, as you jdeluise note, make up, hair transplants, > words often, etc so somewhat and partially, it's kinda feminine, > and I do believe it's what makes or
made him more visible, > palpatable and relatable than for example Ted Cruz who seemed > dull?>> Not commenting on politics at all. >>>>> So the really funny thing is we do treat him as a woman. We > don't take him by his words. His fans don't care what
he says, > basically Trump's words are meaningless?>> He says so much and of course something has to contradict the > other, but we don't care.>> If you like him, you like him.>> So yeah, he's like a woman to us.He's also catty and vindictive. This
indictment of Comey for instance, I'd be shocked if it didn't get thrown out for vindictive prosecution. Mostly due to Trump's own post-menopausal ran.. I mean posts, and pleas to Bondi. Some of these other "mortgage fraud" cases he's brought are
similarly fraught. Trump may not even care about winning them, he's just hissing and scratching. Normative manly behavior? Ya, I think not.




But crushing your enemies is also very masculine.

Showing mercy or building bridges after you have won, is one thing, but fighting is another.

E.g. handshakes in men's game are often warmer and more cordial and women are bitches.


https://www.reddit.com/r/tennis/comments/1hzidn3/qinwen_zheng_says_if_she_loses_she_wont_give_a_handshake


https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/international-sports/iga-witek-vs-victoria-azarenka-the-viral-frostbite-handshake-that-shocked-tennis-fans/articleshow/122107232.cms


https://www.cbc.ca/sports/tennis/eugenie-bouchard-loses-after-refusing-to-shake-opponent-s-hand-1.3038945




But men's cordial handshake and hugs all of that is after the war. Men fight hard.

Trump is still in a war.


This is very Sawfish is right.




--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Linux v1.05
* Origin: Dragon's Lair ---:- FidoNet<>Usenet Gateway -:--- (3:633/10)

From: skriptis@post.t-com.hr

Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

On 9/26/25 12:17 AM, *skriptis wrote:> jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> On 9/25/25 9:38 PM, *skriptis wrote:>> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>>> On 9/25/25 7:44 PM, jdeluise

wrote:> Sawfish >>> <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> > >>>> The country is being >>> run by an unashamedly authoritarian masculine>> leadership >>> cadre. Maybe we'd have to go back to Andrew Jackson to see>> a >>> similarly forceful leader.>>>> WRT hands,
have you ever seen >>> Xi's?>>>> >>> https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/14/asia/gallery/xi-jinping>>>> >>> Napoleon complex, but with hand-size?> > I guess Trump's >>> masculine... presuming that includes chronic > indecisiveness, >>> emotional neediness, and
pathological vanity. The > whininess >>> alone is a disqualifier for me. But hey, you're entitled to > >>> your opinion!So..."The country is being run by an unashamedly >>> authoritarian masculineleadership cadre. Maybe we'd have to go >>> back to
Andrew Jackson to seea similarly forceful >>> leader."sounded too much like praise, j?So you are saying >>> we're *not* being run by "an unashamedly authoritarian >>> masculine leadership cadre"?-- >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Open >>> the pod bay doors, >>> HAL."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>> I think this is a good read for you.>> https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/trump-feminine-speaking-style-
214391/>> Basically if this is true it could mean Trump has established>> himself as a woman in our relationship to him, he talks but we >> like>> him not what he's saying but for what he is, and we don't >> really pay>> attention to what he's saying?>>
Maybe a Pelle, expert on genders could say a word here?>> >> Huh.>> I hadn't realized how masculine Ted Cruz and Dennis Kusinich > are. Boy,> oh boy, was I ever wrong about them!!! Bernie Sanders, too!!!>> Thanks so much, skript! I'm sure glad that
someone smart, like a > UC> professor, can definitively set us straight, huh?Makeup, hair transplants, girdles, shoulder pads... mmm, manly? Must be an Portland thing.> > > > > This is a funny topic but I for one do not dismiss this idea.> > I feel there'
s something in it.> > In a world that's has been thoroughly feminised, even a macho persona is tainted by the era in which he lives.> > He has to, sort of, evolve to maintain success.> > So he's not really "macho" per old textbook, but neither is our
world anymore.> > > > > It's basically like those genetic manipulation of different spices and animals. If science were to recreate mammoth, clone it, they'd probably have to use bits of elephant genome or whatever so it wouldn't be a true mammoth from
a bygone era, technically, but would be very very close to it.> > > This is it.> > Trump is masculine no doubt in his views, resolve, forceful projection etc so Sawfish is right, but he's wrapped it in feminine style, as you jdeluise note, make up, hair
transplants, words often, etc so somewhat and partially, it's kinda feminine, and I do believe it's what makes or made him more visible, palpatable and relatable than for example Ted Cruz who seemed dull?> > Not commenting on politics at all.> > > > > So
the really funny thing is we do treat him as a woman. We don't take him by his words. His fans don't care what he says, basically Trump's words are meaningless?> > He says so much and of course something has to contradict the other, but we don't care.> >
If you like him, you like him.> > So yeah, he's like a woman to us.> > > > > I think those are supportable and plausible points. I also think that we could examine historical leaders and maybe we'd see an evolution.My guess is that when alpha male
leaders quit having outrageously large harems is when it started.What say you?-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Open the pod bay doors, HAL."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~



There is no golden age really, in Mozart era men wore wigs and makeup and high heels. Is that masculine?


Perhaps the most masculine era was Victorian age, and we feel the residue of that, but that's not usual age at all.

It was perhaps the best, but it's hardly a historical norm.



Here's another thought. Why did Germans die for Fatherland and Russians for Motherland?

It's the same kinda, but also it is isn't.

Language is important.



So that's why I am open to analysis like these regarding Trump.




--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Linux v1.05
* Origin: Dragon's Lair ---:- FidoNet<>Usenet Gateway -:--- (3:633/10)