We finally got a final SCOTUS decision in Case v. Montana, 607 U.S. ___ >(2026), Docket No. 24-624 and it wasn?t a good one.
It wasn?t just some of the conservative justices that were wishy-washy here, >they *all* were. A 9-0 decision that says not only do the cops not need a >warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion to forcefully enter your >home while in their ?community caretaker? role, if they know you?re a gun >owner, the use of even greater force is justified. And it?s justified so >they?re better able to protect you. They managed to gut both the 2nd and 4th >Amendments with one blow.
On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 22:20:05 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
We finally got a final SCOTUS decision in Case v. Montana, 607 U.S. ___
(2026), Docket No. 24-624 and it wasn?t a good one.
It wasn?t just some of the conservative justices that were wishy-washy here, >> they *all* were. A 9-0 decision that says not only do the cops not need a
warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion to forcefully enter
your
home while in their ?community caretaker? role, if they know you?re a gun
owner, the use of even greater force is justified. And it?s justified so
they?re better able to protect you. They managed to gut both the 2nd and 4th >> Amendments with one blow.
So we can see the idea of "You can take my gun away from my cold dead
hands" play out in real life. Lovely.
We finally got a final SCOTUS decision in Case v. Montana, 607 U.S. ___ >(2026), Docket No. 24-624 and it wasn?t a good one.
We finally got a final SCOTUS decision in Case v. Montana, 607 U.S. ___ (2026), Docket No. 24-624 and it wasn?t a good one.
It wasn?t just some of the conservative justices that were wishy-washy here, they *all* were. A 9-0 decision that says not only do the cops not need a warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion to forcefully enter your
home while in their ?community caretaker? role, if they know you?re a gun owner, the use of even greater force is justified. And it?s justified so they?re better able to protect you. They managed to gut both the 2nd and 4th Amendments with one blow.
On 3/10/2026 6:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
We finally got a final SCOTUS decision in Case v. Montana, 607 U.S. ___
(2026), Docket No. 24-624 and it wasn?t a good one.
It wasn?t just some of the conservative justices that were wishy-washy here,
they *all* were. A 9-0 decision that says not only do the cops not need a >> warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion to forcefully enter >> your
home while in their ?community caretaker? role, if they know you?re a gun >> owner, the use of even greater force is justified. And it?s justified so
they?re better able to protect you. They managed to gut both the 2nd and 4th
Amendments with one blow.
Should the likelihood of a gun on the premises be withheld from cops?
We finally got a final SCOTUS decision in Case v. Montana, 607 U.S. ___ >(2026), Docket No. 24-624 and it wasn't a good one.
It wasn't just some of the conservative justices that were wishy-washy here, >they *all* were. A 9-0 decision that says not only do the cops not need a >warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion to forcefully enter your >home while in their 'community caretaker' role, if they know you're a gun >owner, the use of even greater force is justified. And it's justified so >they're better able to protect you. They managed to gut both the 2nd and 4th >Amendments with one blow.
On Mar 10, 2026 at 7:10:29 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/10/2026 6:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
We finally got a final SCOTUS decision in Case v. Montana, 607 U.S. ___ >>> (2026), Docket No. 24-624 and it wasn?t a good one.
It wasn?t just some of the conservative justices that were wishy-washy here,
they *all* were. A 9-0 decision that says not only do the cops not need a >>> warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion to forcefully enter >>> your
home while in their ?community caretaker? role, if they know you?re a gun >>> owner, the use of even greater force is justified. And it?s justified so >>> they?re better able to protect you. They managed to gut both the 2nd and 4th
Amendments with one blow.
Should the likelihood of a gun on the premises be withheld from cops?
The peaceful exercise of a guaranteed constitutional right shouldn't give the government more leeway to hurt you. For your own good, of course.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
We finally got a final SCOTUS decision in Case v. Montana, 607 U.S. ___
(2026), Docket No. 24-624 and it wasn't a good one.
It wasn't just some of the conservative justices that were wishy-washy here, >> they *all* were. A 9-0 decision that says not only do the cops not need a
warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion to forcefully enter
your
home while in their 'community caretaker' role, if they know you're a gun
owner, the use of even greater force is justified. And it's justified so
they're better able to protect you. They managed to gut both the 2nd and 4th >> Amendments with one blow.
I haven't done my homework on this case. Please tell me, was this about preventing the estate of the "protected" homeowner from suing for P.I.?
I'm assuming he was killed in the raid.
Mar 10, 2026 at 10:30:10 PM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
We finally got a final SCOTUS decision in Case v. Montana, 607 U.S. ___ >>>(2026), Docket No. 24-624 and it wasn't a good one.
It wasn't just some of the conservative justices that were wishy-washy >>>here, they *all* were. A 9-0 decision that says not only do the cops
not need a warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion
to forcefully enter your home while in their 'community caretaker'
role, if they know you're a gun owner, the use of even greater force
is justified. And it's justified so they're better able to protect
you. They managed to gut both the 2nd and 4th Amendments with one blow.
I haven't done my homework on this case. Please tell me, was this about >>preventing the estate of the "protected" homeowner from suing for P.I.?
I'm assuming he was killed in the raid.
No, just shot in the arm.
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 119:30:30 |
| Calls: | 125 |
| Calls today: | 125 |
| Files: | 489 |
| D/L today: |
859 files (365M bytes) |
| Messages: | 76,559 |
| Posted today: | 26 |