• Re: RR Croyd by Ian Wallace

    From Don@3:633/10 to All on Saturday, October 03, 2026 18:00:36
    Ted Nolan <tednolan> <ted@loft.tnolan.com> wrote:
    I have not had the mental energy lately to get up to date with
    monthly reviews, but I did spend a good chunk of time a couple of
    months ago wrestling wtih Ian Wallace's _Croyd_, and by wrestling,
    I mean trying to produce a readable e-text of this very interesting
    late 60's book from a very bad one and a so-so PDF. Wallace is
    throwing out lots of very Van Vogtian ideas here: Hired governments,
    mind transfer, uptime, downtime, free will, imortality, alphas in
    love, destroying the galaxy..., and it's a fascinating read. I
    believe the final third does bog down a little, but it's well worth
    your time, as is the second book _Dr. Orpheus_, for which I could
    not find even an awful e-text.

    <snip>

    REDACTOR'S PREFACE

    I know very little about Ian Wallace. Isfdb.org says his real name
    was John Wallace Pritchard, that he was born in Chicago on 4 December
    1912 and passed on 7 July 1998.

    What I do know is that for several years in the late 1960s and the
    early 1970s, he was the the most interesting author writing in the
    barely populated genre of A. E. van Vogt inspired tales of supermen,
    monsters and unreality conditions. Van Vogt himself had largely
    retired by this point, though he would return to the genre in the
    same time period with his late book The Silkie, and basically nobody
    else had taken up his mantle.

    I am aware of only one contemporary review of Croyd, from the dean
    of SF reviewers, P. Schulyer Miller in his monthly column in Analog
    (nee Astounding) magazine: The Reference Library. Here's what he
    had to say on pages 175 & 176 of the October 1969 issue of Analog:

    Here's a real "sleeper" -- a superman story whose hardcover
    sneaked out, practically unnoticed some time in 1967. The
    hardback publisher, Putnam, sometimes sends books for review
    and sometimes does not. In this case, I didn't even know
    it existed . . . so the reprint deserves full treatment.
    There is, for some reason, a strong flavor of 'Doc (Skylark)
    Smith in the story -- yet it is by no means pure space
    opera. You might call it a new generation of the old genre.
    Gnurls -- nasties from the Large Magellanic Cloud -- have
    by no means occupied their own small galaxy, but they are
    determined to take over ours. They can project or inject
    their minds into other beings while their bodies lie in
    stasis, and the book's anti-heroine, Lurla, does just that.
    Pitted against her is the Defender of Mankind, the super-agent
    Croyd, who can also get into other people's brains --
    including hers. And, just to keep things from getting dull,
    there is a sort of New Left revolt of the umpty-umpth century
    going on in the wings, which also requires Croyd's talents.
    Shuttling back and forth among each other, the protagonists
    and antagonists will make you dizzy. It's fun, though.

    Surprisingly given that van Vogt was a discovery of Analog's editor
    John W. Campbell, and grew to fame in its pages, Miller misses the
    van Vogt connection entirely. It's not that he's wrong that bits
    of Croyd are Doc Smith crashing-worlds, Space Opera. There is
    definitely some of that, but the main story is of a van Vogt-ian
    superman confronting large and outre menaces of hand-wavingly
    described, but compelling, super-science, undergoing near fatal
    reverses but rallying to defeat all as humanely as possible.

    Thank you for your mental gymnastics.

    Van Vogt ranks as brightest of Campbell's Big Three. The "superman
    story" mentioned by Miller may pertain to van Vogt's characterization
    rather than pop culture's cartoon character.

    Autumn's a good time to re-visit van Vogt and then tackle Wallace for
    the first time. Poe and van Vogt both value imaginative intuition over
    rote ritualization. Null-A, non-Aristotelian logic, expresses van Vogt's sentiments.
    On a nearby shelf sits two volumes of EUCLID'S ELEMENTS. It's facing
    pages present the original Greek followed by an English translation. It epitomizes the problem with Aristotelian logic.
    ELEMENTS' beautiful logic is self-contained. It lives in its own constrained world where it rules absolutely. Although imaginative
    intuition is able to apply ELEMENTS' rules to the wider world, ELEMENTS'
    own ontological outlook keeps it circling - creeping and crawling around
    in a rut.

    Danke,

    --
    Don.......My cat's )\._.,--....,'``. veritas _|_ telltale tall tail /, _.. \ _\ (`._ ,. liberabit |
    tells tall tales.. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' vos |


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.19
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From William Hyde@3:633/10 to All on Saturday, October 03, 2026 14:56:47
    Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:

    Surprisingly given that van Vogt was a discovery of Analog's editor
    John W. Campbell, and grew to fame in its pages, Miller misses the
    van Vogt connection entirely.


    I missed it as well, which is surprising as I was reading a lot of Van
    Vogt at the time.

    I didn't rank Wallace among my favourite authors at the time, but I did
    buy all I could find on local bookshelves, (which alas didn't include
    "Croyd") as I did enjoy his works.

    Thanks for reminding me about Wallace and for the review.

    I did read Van Vogt's "The Silkie) (1969) when it came out and his "A
    Darkness on Diamondia" (1974) but I missed his later novels, which he continued writing until 1983.


    William Hyde


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.19
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)