?I Tested Starlink?s Low-Cost $80-Per-Month Plan: It's Not the Downgrade
I Expected?
https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlink-residential-lite-200mbps-plan-speed- tests
?I put Starlink's Residential 200 Mbps 'Lite' plan through its paces to
see if deprioritized data means a second-class experience. What I found?
You might not even notice the difference.?
?A lot of people want Starlink satellite internet, but not everyone
wants to pay $120 a month for it?the going rate for the standard
service. To expand Starlink access to a wider population, satellite
internet provider SpaceX introduced lower-tier residential service
plans, starting with what it called, at launch, Residential Lite. In
recent months, this single budget-friendly option was actually split
into two plans, the Residential 100 Mbps and Residential 200 Mbps plans. They cost $50 and $80 per month, respectively.?
Looks like a bargain to me.
Lynn
?I Tested Starlink?s Low-Cost $80-Per-Month Plan: It's Not theDowngrade
I Expected?tests
https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlink-residential-lite-200mbps-plan-speed-
?I put Starlink's Residential 200 Mbps 'Lite' plan through its pacesto
see if deprioritized data means a second-class experience. What I found?
You might not even notice the difference.?
?A lot of people want Starlink satellite internet, but not everyone
wants to pay $120 a month for it?the going rate for the standard
service. To expand Starlink access to a wider population, satellite
internet provider SpaceX introduced lower-tier residential service
plans, starting with what it called, at launch, Residential Lite. In
recent months, this single budget-friendly option was actually split
into two plans, the Residential 100 Mbps and Residential 200 Mbps plans.
They cost $50 and $80 per month, respectively.?
Looks like a bargain to me.
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 18:05:48 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
?I Tested Starlink?s Low-Cost $80-Per-Month Plan: It's Not the Downgrade
I Expected?
https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlink-residential-lite-200mbps-plan-speed-tests
?I put Starlink's Residential 200 Mbps 'Lite' plan through its paces to
see if deprioritized data means a second-class experience. What I found?
You might not even notice the difference.?
?A lot of people want Starlink satellite internet, but not everyone
wants to pay $120 a month for it?the going rate for the standard
service. To expand Starlink access to a wider population, satellite
internet provider SpaceX introduced lower-tier residential service
plans, starting with what it called, at launch, Residential Lite. In
recent months, this single budget-friendly option was actually split
into two plans, the Residential 100 Mbps and Residential 200 Mbps plans.
They cost $50 and $80 per month, respectively.?
Looks like a bargain to me.
I said it before and I'll say it again:
When I had DSL at 2.6 Mbps (? -- the change from 1.5 to 2.6 came when
they bumped the bill $5/mo without explanation), it worked just fine
for me.
OK, really large downloads took a while, but Agent, the browser, and
local programs ran very well. Given the speed of the processor.
The only reason I can fathom for anything as fast as what I have now
would be if I were in a large family with a /great great many/ devices
using the Gateway at the same time. And that is probably based on
assumptions I am not even aware of.
On 3/9/2026 11:39 AM, Paul S Person wrote:Downgrade
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 18:05:48 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
?I Tested Starlink?s Low-Cost $80-Per-Month Plan: It's Not the
https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlink-residential-lite-200mbps-plan-speed-tI Expected?
paces to
?I put Starlink's Residential 200 Mbps 'Lite' plan through its
found?see if deprioritized data means a second-class experience. What I
plans.You might not even notice the difference.?
?A lot of people want Starlink satellite internet, but not everyone
wants to pay $120 a month for it?the going rate for the standard
service. To expand Starlink access to a wider population, satellite
internet provider SpaceX introduced lower-tier residential service
plans, starting with what it called, at launch, Residential Lite. In
recent months, this single budget-friendly option was actually split
into two plans, the Residential 100 Mbps and Residential 200 Mbps
They cost $50 and $80 per month, respectively.?
Looks like a bargain to me.
I said it before and I'll say it again:
When I had DSL at 2.6 Mbps (? -- the change from 1.5 to 2.6 came when
they bumped the bill $5/mo without explanation), it worked just fine
for me.
OK, really large downloads took a while, but Agent, the browser, and
local programs ran very well. Given the speed of the processor.
The only reason I can fathom for anything as fast as what I have now
would be if I were in a large family with a /great great many/ devices
using the Gateway at the same time. And that is probably based on
assumptions I am not even aware of.
Can you stream a 4K movie on your DSL ?
On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:07:53 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/9/2026 11:39 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 18:05:48 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
?I Tested Starlink?s Low-Cost $80-Per-Month Plan: It's Not the Downgrade >>>> I Expected?
https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlink-residential-lite-200mbps-plan-speed-tests
?I put Starlink's Residential 200 Mbps 'Lite' plan through its paces to >>>> see if deprioritized data means a second-class experience. What I found? >>>> You might not even notice the difference.?
?A lot of people want Starlink satellite internet, but not everyone
wants to pay $120 a month for it?the going rate for the standard
service. To expand Starlink access to a wider population, satellite
internet provider SpaceX introduced lower-tier residential service
plans, starting with what it called, at launch, Residential Lite. In
recent months, this single budget-friendly option was actually split
into two plans, the Residential 100 Mbps and Residential 200 Mbps plans. >>>> They cost $50 and $80 per month, respectively.?
Looks like a bargain to me.
I said it before and I'll say it again:
When I had DSL at 2.6 Mbps (? -- the change from 1.5 to 2.6 came when
they bumped the bill $5/mo without explanation), it worked just fine
for me.
OK, really large downloads took a while, but Agent, the browser, and
local programs ran very well. Given the speed of the processor.
The only reason I can fathom for anything as fast as what I have now
would be if I were in a large family with a /great great many/ devices
using the Gateway at the same time. And that is probably based on
assumptions I am not even aware of.
Can you stream a 4K movie on your DSL ?
Who streams?
Who bothers with 4K when SD works just fine?
See, that is the difference: I care about what works (for me). Others
care about the Latest and (allegedly) Greatest.
On 3/11/2026 10:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:07:53 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/9/2026 11:39 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 18:05:48 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
?I Tested Starlink?s Low-Cost $80-Per-Month Plan: It's Not the
Downgrade
I Expected?
https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlink-residential-lite-200mbps-plan-
speed-tests
?I put Starlink's Residential 200 Mbps 'Lite' plan through its
paces to
see if deprioritized data means a second-class experience. What I
found?
You might not even notice the difference.?
?A lot of people want Starlink satellite internet, but not everyone
wants to pay $120 a month for it?the going rate for the standard
service. To expand Starlink access to a wider population, satellite
internet provider SpaceX introduced lower-tier residential service
plans, starting with what it called, at launch, Residential Lite. In >>>>> recent months, this single budget-friendly option was actually split >>>>> into two plans, the Residential 100 Mbps and Residential 200 Mbps
plans.
They cost $50 and $80 per month, respectively.?
Looks like a bargain to me.
I said it before and I'll say it again:
When I had DSL at 2.6 Mbps (? -- the change from 1.5 to 2.6 came when
they bumped the bill $5/mo without explanation), it worked just fine
for me.
OK, really large downloads took a while, but Agent, the browser, and
local programs ran very well. Given the speed of the processor.
The only reason I can fathom for anything as fast as what I have now
would be if I were in a large family with a /great great many/ devices >>>> using the Gateway at the same time. And that is probably based on
assumptions I am not even aware of.
Can you stream a 4K movie on your DSL ?
Who streams?
Who bothers with 4K when SD works just fine?
See, that is the difference: I care about what works (for me). Others
care about the Latest and (allegedly) Greatest.
I stream 4K all the time from Netflix, Prime, and Hulu.˙ It looks great
on my 55 inch TV.˙ Especially MLB baseball and Aggie Football.
Lynn
On 3/11/26 13:23, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 3/11/2026 10:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:07:53 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/9/2026 11:39 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 18:05:48 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
?I Tested Starlink?s Low-Cost $80-Per-Month Plan: It's Not the
Downgrade
I Expected?
https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlink-residential-lite-200mbps-plan- >>>>>> speed-tests
?I put Starlink's Residential 200 Mbps 'Lite' plan through its
paces to
see if deprioritized data means a second-class experience. What I >>>>>> found?
You might not even notice the difference.?
?A lot of people want Starlink satellite internet, but not everyone >>>>>> wants to pay $120 a month for it?the going rate for the standard
service. To expand Starlink access to a wider population, satellite >>>>>> internet provider SpaceX introduced lower-tier residential service >>>>>> plans, starting with what it called, at launch, Residential Lite. In >>>>>> recent months, this single budget-friendly option was actually split >>>>>> into two plans, the Residential 100 Mbps and Residential 200 Mbps >>>>>> plans.
They cost $50 and $80 per month, respectively.?
Looks like a bargain to me.
I said it before and I'll say it again:
When I had DSL at 2.6 Mbps (? -- the change from 1.5 to 2.6 came when >>>>> they bumped the bill $5/mo without explanation), it worked just fine >>>>> for me.
OK, really large downloads took a while, but Agent, the browser, and >>>>> local programs ran very well. Given the speed of the processor.
The only reason I can fathom for anything as fast as what I have now >>>>> would be if I were in a large family with a /great great many/ devices >>>>> using the Gateway at the same time. And that is probably based on
assumptions I am not even aware of.
Can you stream a 4K movie on your DSL ?
Who streams?
Who bothers with 4K when SD works just fine?
See, that is the difference: I care about what works (for me). Others
care about the Latest and (allegedly) Greatest.
I stream 4K all the time from Netflix, Prime, and Hulu.˙ It looks
great on my 55 inch TV.˙ Especially MLB baseball and Aggie Football.
Lynn
˙˙˙˙And you find time to read as well?
˙˙˙˙Astounding, Amazing, a Thrilling Wonder Story!
˙˙˙˙We will call it the "Man Who Had Time!".
˙˙˙˙I get too tired to read earlier and earlier and resort to escapist TV
if nothing educational is on PBS.˙ Grimm is pretty good on Comet especially if you can catch the early shows that cover the relationships
˙˙˙˙The Librarians is a bit too glossy. But the title grabs me.
˙˙˙˙The premise is good and the actors are well cast.
˙˙˙˙bliss - as my time grows shorter...
Can you stream a 4K movie on your DSL ?
Who streams?
Who bothers with 4K when SD works just fine?
See, that is the difference: I care about what works (for me). Others
care about the Latest and (allegedly) Greatest.
I stream 4K all the time from Netflix, Prime, and Hulu.˙ It looks
great on my 55 inch TV.˙ Especially MLB baseball and Aggie Football.
Lynn
˙˙˙˙And you find time to read as well?
˙˙˙˙Astounding, Amazing, a Thrilling Wonder Story!
˙˙˙˙We will call it the "Man Who Had Time!".
˙˙˙˙I get too tired to read earlier and earlier and resort to escapist TV
if nothing educational is on PBS.˙ Grimm is pretty good on Comet especially if you can catch the early shows that cover the relationships
˙˙˙˙The Librarians is a bit too glossy. But the title grabs me.
˙˙˙˙The premise is good and the actors are well cast.
˙˙˙˙bliss - as my time grows shorter...
On 3/11/2026 3:40 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
On 3/11/26 13:23, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 3/11/2026 10:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:07:53 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/9/2026 11:39 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 18:05:48 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
?I Tested Starlink?s Low-Cost $80-Per-Month Plan: It's Not the
Downgrade
I Expected?
https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlink-residential-lite-200mbps-
plan- speed-tests
?I put Starlink's Residential 200 Mbps 'Lite' plan through its
paces to
see if deprioritized data means a second-class experience. What I >>>>>>> found?
You might not even notice the difference.?
?A lot of people want Starlink satellite internet, but not everyone >>>>>>> wants to pay $120 a month for it?the going rate for the standard >>>>>>> service. To expand Starlink access to a wider population, satellite >>>>>>> internet provider SpaceX introduced lower-tier residential service >>>>>>> plans, starting with what it called, at launch, Residential Lite. In >>>>>>> recent months, this single budget-friendly option was actually split >>>>>>> into two plans, the Residential 100 Mbps and Residential 200 Mbps >>>>>>> plans.
They cost $50 and $80 per month, respectively.?
Looks like a bargain to me.
I said it before and I'll say it again:
When I had DSL at 2.6 Mbps (? -- the change from 1.5 to 2.6 came when >>>>>> they bumped the bill $5/mo without explanation), it worked just fine >>>>>> for me.
OK, really large downloads took a while, but Agent, the browser, and >>>>>> local programs ran very well. Given the speed of the processor.
The only reason I can fathom for anything as fast as what I have now >>>>>> would be if I were in a large family with a /great great many/
devices
using the Gateway at the same time. And that is probably based on
assumptions I am not even aware of.
Can you stream a 4K movie on your DSL ?
Who streams?
Who bothers with 4K when SD works just fine?
See, that is the difference: I care about what works (for me). Others
care about the Latest and (allegedly) Greatest.
I stream 4K all the time from Netflix, Prime, and Hulu.˙ It looks
great on my 55 inch TV.˙ Especially MLB baseball and Aggie Football.
Lynn
˙˙˙˙˙And you find time to read as well?
˙˙˙˙˙Astounding, Amazing, a Thrilling Wonder Story!
˙˙˙˙˙We will call it the "Man Who Had Time!".
˙˙˙˙˙I get too tired to read earlier and earlier and resort to
escapist TV
if nothing educational is on PBS.˙ Grimm is pretty good on Comet
especially
if you can catch the early shows that cover the relationships
˙˙˙˙˙The Librarians is a bit too glossy. But the title grabs me.
˙˙˙˙˙The premise is good and the actors are well cast.
˙˙˙˙˙bliss - as my time grows shorter...
I do. Being retired helps. Evenings are TV shows or movies with the
wife. Usually a couple hours of reading during the day and up to an hour
at bedtime. Still get my 7-8 hours. The only difference when I was
working was daytime reading was generally during lunch hour so my book- per-week rate has gone up by 1 or 2. A few years younger than you I
believe, maybe 10? I'm 72.
And both those shows are favorites.
On 3/11/2026 3:40 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
...
Can you stream a 4K movie on your DSL ?
Who streams?
Who bothers with 4K when SD works just fine?
See, that is the difference: I care about what works (for me). Others
care about the Latest and (allegedly) Greatest.
I stream 4K all the time from Netflix, Prime, and Hulu.˙ It looks
great on my 55 inch TV.˙ Especially MLB baseball and Aggie Football.
Lynn
˙˙˙˙˙And you find time to read as well?
˙˙˙˙˙Astounding, Amazing, a Thrilling Wonder Story!
˙˙˙˙˙We will call it the "Man Who Had Time!".
˙˙˙˙˙I get too tired to read earlier and earlier and resort to
escapist TV
if nothing educational is on PBS.˙ Grimm is pretty good on Comet
especially
if you can catch the early shows that cover the relationships
˙˙˙˙˙The Librarians is a bit too glossy. But the title grabs me.
˙˙˙˙˙The premise is good and the actors are well cast.
˙˙˙˙˙bliss - as my time grows shorter...
I only get to watch tv on Saturday and Sunday due to my time constraints
in life.˙ The nice thing is that 3 of my 4 businesses are producing cash
at the moment so life is good.
I spend a couple of hours after church with my mother every Sunday as I
had to put her in Assisted Living last October.˙ And I walk 1.5 to 2.5
miles with my wife almost every day if it is not raining or below 25 F.
It is a good life if one can keep the energy going.˙ That is what Jerry Pournelle used to say.
You sound like you are in much better shape than my 84 year old mother
who had me when she was 18.˙ We are missing my father a lot who passed
away last year.˙ Mom and Dad were married for 2 days short of 66 years.
Lynn
On 3/11/26 15:31, Jay Morris wrote:The Librarians started as made-for-TV films on TNT, then a series for
On 3/11/2026 3:40 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
On 3/11/26 13:23, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 3/11/2026 10:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:07:53 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/9/2026 11:39 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 18:05:48 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
?I Tested Starlink?s Low-Cost $80-Per-Month Plan: It's Not the >>>>>>>> Downgrade
I Expected?
https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlink-residential-lite-200mbps- >>>>>>>> plan- speed-tests
?I put Starlink's Residential 200 Mbps 'Lite' plan through its >>>>>>>> paces to
see if deprioritized data means a second-class experience. What >>>>>>>> I found?
You might not even notice the difference.?
?A lot of people want Starlink satellite internet, but not everyone >>>>>>>> wants to pay $120 a month for it?the going rate for the standard >>>>>>>> service. To expand Starlink access to a wider population, satellite >>>>>>>> internet provider SpaceX introduced lower-tier residential service >>>>>>>> plans, starting with what it called, at launch, Residential
Lite. In
recent months, this single budget-friendly option was actually >>>>>>>> split
into two plans, the Residential 100 Mbps and Residential 200
Mbps plans.
They cost $50 and $80 per month, respectively.?
Looks like a bargain to me.
I said it before and I'll say it again:
When I had DSL at 2.6 Mbps (? -- the change from 1.5 to 2.6 came >>>>>>> when
they bumped the bill $5/mo without explanation), it worked just fine >>>>>>> for me.
OK, really large downloads took a while, but Agent, the browser, and >>>>>>> local programs ran very well. Given the speed of the processor.
The only reason I can fathom for anything as fast as what I have now >>>>>>> would be if I were in a large family with a /great great many/
devices
using the Gateway at the same time. And that is probably based on >>>>>>> assumptions I am not even aware of.
Can you stream a 4K movie on your DSL ?
Who streams?
Who bothers with 4K when SD works just fine?
See, that is the difference: I care about what works (for me). Others >>>>> care about the Latest and (allegedly) Greatest.
I stream 4K all the time from Netflix, Prime, and Hulu.˙ It looks
great on my 55 inch TV.˙ Especially MLB baseball and Aggie Football.
Lynn
˙˙˙˙˙And you find time to read as well?
˙˙˙˙˙Astounding, Amazing, a Thrilling Wonder Story!
˙˙˙˙˙We will call it the "Man Who Had Time!".
˙˙˙˙˙I get too tired to read earlier and earlier and resort to
escapist TV
if nothing educational is on PBS.˙ Grimm is pretty good on Comet
especially
if you can catch the early shows that cover the relationships
˙˙˙˙˙The Librarians is a bit too glossy. But the title grabs me.
˙˙˙˙˙The premise is good and the actors are well cast.
˙˙˙˙˙bliss - as my time grows shorter...
I do. Being retired helps. Evenings are TV shows or movies with the
wife. Usually a couple hours of reading during the day and up to an
hour at bedtime. Still get my 7-8 hours. The only difference when I
was working was daytime reading was generally during lunch hour so my
book- per-week rate has gone up by 1 or 2. A few years younger than
you I believe, maybe 10? I'm 72.
˙˙˙˙I am 16 years on you, trying to make it 17 and if I do the next
step will be 89.
And both those shows are favorites.
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 119:31:33 |
| Calls: | 125 |
| Calls today: | 125 |
| Files: | 489 |
| D/L today: |
859 files (365M bytes) |
| Messages: | 76,559 |
| Posted today: | 26 |