[1] Did anyone else notice that, at the end of one of the Lensmen
books, the boy is advised by a senior to marry the girl and the next
book starts with them being married long enough to have children (and
not, IIRC, infants either) with /no clue whatsoever where the babies
came from being provided/? This is the sort of thing that the later
sex-laded stories were reacting against.
On 30/01/2026 11.41, Paul S Person wrote:twenty-year
[1] Did anyone else notice that, at the end of one of the Lensmen
books, the boy is advised by a senior to marry the girl and the next
book starts with them being married long enough to have children (and
not, IIRC, infants either) with /no clue whatsoever where the babies
came from being provided/? This is the sort of thing that the later
sex-laded stories were reacting against.
"The boy"? I am assuming that you're referring to the roughly
gap between _Second Stage Lensman_ and _Children of the Lens_. If so, Kinnisonyears by
was probably 22 when he graduated from Wentworth Hall. The events of _Galactic
Patrol_, _Gray Lensman_, and _Second Stage Lensman_ took about nine
my reckoning, so he would have been roughly thirty-one when he andMacDougall
married. Not, in my mind, a "boy" any more.
In article <10nnqe6$1430i$1@dont-email.me>,
Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
And your recollection that the Children of the Lens were not infants is >quite correct. The youngest -- the twins Camilla and Constance -- were >roughly sixteen when _Children of the Lens_ opens. Old enough that one
of them had to fend off a wolf when (IIRC) checking into some hotel.
There were plenty of allusions to sex in _Children of the Lens_, mostly
Kit noticing that his sisters were pretty hot and his mother was in
MILF territory herself. Serious implied incest -- enough to make RAH
proud -- even if the acts themselves were not portrayed.
I think Smith got away with about as much as Campbell would allow. Remember all the naked people in both the Skylark & Lensman universes?
Reading his detective novel is instructive.
In article <10nnqe6$1430i$1@dont-email.me>,
Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
On 30/01/2026 11.41, Paul S Person wrote:
[1] Did anyone else notice that, at the end of one of the Lensmen
books, the boy is advised by a senior to marry the girl and the next
book starts with them being married long enough to have children (and
not, IIRC, infants either) with /no clue whatsoever where the babies
came from being provided/? This is the sort of thing that the later
sex-laded stories were reacting against.
There were plenty of allusions to sex in _Children of the Lens_, mostly
Kit noticing that his sisters were pretty hot and his mother was in
MILF territory herself. Serious implied incest -- enough to make RAH
proud -- even if the acts themselves were not portrayed.
I think Smith got away with about as much as Campbell would allow.
Reading his detective novel is instructive.
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 14:59:32 |
| Calls: | 123 |
| Calls today: | 123 |
| Files: | 461 |
| D/L today: |
793 files (319M bytes) |
| Messages: | 77,387 |
| Posted today: | 26 |