1) This story had time travelers who manipulated time by changing events
in the past (and thus generate a new timeline). The story also had a character (non-time traveller) who remembered the erased timelines
(IIRC, he, on occasion, couldn't find books he remembered reading
because they had been written in the erased timeline and not the new
one). I also remember that the last time manipulation that the time travelers performed in the book erased a time line where that character
had been murdered. In the new one, he was still alive and he did
remember being killed. BTW, sometime during the book, the time travelers became aware of him.
On 13/01/26 19:08, Robert Woodward wrote:
snip
1) This story had time travelers who manipulated time by changing events in the past (and thus generate a new timeline). The story also had a character (non-time traveller) who remembered the erased timelines
(IIRC, he, on occasion, couldn't find books he remembered reading
because they had been written in the erased timeline and not the new
one). I also remember that the last time manipulation that the time travelers performed in the book erased a time line where that character had been murdered. In the new one, he was still alive and he did
remember being killed. BTW, sometime during the book, the time travelers became aware of him.
Murder in Metachronopolis by John C. Wright?
But it was first published in 2010 (isfdb).
It is the first story in City Beyond Time sub titled TALES OF THE FALL
OF METACHRONOPOLIS.
Robert Woodward wrote:
snip
1) This story had time travelers who manipulated time by changing events
in the past (and thus generate a new timeline). The story also had a
character (non-time traveller) who remembered the erased timelines
(IIRC, he, on occasion, couldn't find books he remembered reading
because they had been written in the erased timeline and not the new
one). I also remember that the last time manipulation that the time
travelers performed in the book erased a time line where that character
had been murdered. In the new one, he was still alive and he did
remember being killed. BTW, sometime during the book, the time travelers
became aware of him.
Murder in Metachronopolis by John C. Wright?
But it was first published in 2010 (isfdb).
It is the first story in City Beyond Time sub titled TALES OF THE FALL
OF METACHRONOPOLIS.
In article <10k75e8$3m73u$1@dont-email.me>, Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 13/01/26 19:08, Robert Woodward wrote:
snip
1) This story had time travelers who manipulated time by changing events >>> in the past (and thus generate a new timeline). The story also had a
character (non-time traveller) who remembered the erased timelines
(IIRC, he, on occasion, couldn't find books he remembered reading
because they had been written in the erased timeline and not the new
one). I also remember that the last time manipulation that the time
travelers performed in the book erased a time line where that character >>> had been murdered. In the new one, he was still alive and he did
remember being killed. BTW, sometime during the book, the time travelers >>> became aware of him.
Murder in Metachronopolis by John C. Wright?
But it was first published in 2010 (isfdb).
It is the first story in City Beyond Time sub titled TALES OF THE FALL
OF METACHRONOPOLIS.
IIRC, I had posted a YASID for book (1) years before that.
Titus G wrote:
Robert Woodward wrote:
snip
1) This story had time travelers who manipulated time by changing events >>> in the past (and thus generate a new timeline). The story also had a
character (non-time traveller) who remembered the erased timelines
(IIRC, he, on occasion, couldn't find books he remembered reading
because they had been written in the erased timeline and not the new
one). I also remember that the last time manipulation that the time
travelers performed in the book erased a time line where that character
had been murdered. In the new one, he was still alive and he did
remember being killed. BTW, sometime during the book, the time travelers >>> became aware of him.
Murder in Metachronopolis by John C. Wright?
But it was first published in 2010 (isfdb).
It is the first story in City Beyond Time sub titled TALES OF THE FALL
OF METACHRONOPOLIS.
Somehow the subtitle's significance eluded me until now. No wonder the non-novel's non-sequitural narrative was incoherent.
Don wrote:
Titus G wrote:
Robert Woodward wrote:
snip
1) This story had time travelers who manipulated time by changing events >>>> in the past (and thus generate a new timeline). The story also had a
character (non-time traveller) who remembered the erased timelines
(IIRC, he, on occasion, couldn't find books he remembered reading
because they had been written in the erased timeline and not the new
one). I also remember that the last time manipulation that the time
travelers performed in the book erased a time line where that character >>>> had been murdered. In the new one, he was still alive and he did
remember being killed. BTW, sometime during the book, the time travelers >>>> became aware of him.
Murder in Metachronopolis by John C. Wright?
But it was first published in 2010 (isfdb).
It is the first story in City Beyond Time sub titled TALES OF THE FALL
OF METACHRONOPOLIS.
Somehow the subtitle's significance eluded me until now. No wonder the
non-novel's non-sequitural narrative was incoherent.
You have lost me. I do not understand the above comment.
In article <10k75e8$3m73u$1@dont-email.me>, Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 13/01/26 19:08, Robert Woodward wrote:
snip
1) This story had time travelers who manipulated time by changing events >>> in the past (and thus generate a new timeline). The story also had a
character (non-time traveller) who remembered the erased timelines
(IIRC, he, on occasion, couldn't find books he remembered reading
because they had been written in the erased timeline and not the new
one). I also remember that the last time manipulation that the time
travelers performed in the book erased a time line where that character >>> had been murdered. In the new one, he was still alive and he did
remember being killed. BTW, sometime during the book, the time travelers >>> became aware of him.
Murder in Metachronopolis by John C. Wright?
But it was first published in 2010 (isfdb).
It is the first story in City Beyond Time sub titled TALES OF THE FALL
OF METACHRONOPOLIS.
IIRC, I had posted a YASID for book (1) years before that.
Titus G wrote:
Don wrote:
Titus G wrote:
Robert Woodward wrote:
snip
1) This story had time travelers who manipulated time by changing events >>>>> in the past (and thus generate a new timeline). The story also had a >>>>> character (non-time traveller) who remembered the erased timelines
(IIRC, he, on occasion, couldn't find books he remembered reading
because they had been written in the erased timeline and not the new >>>>> one). I also remember that the last time manipulation that the time
travelers performed in the book erased a time line where that character >>>>> had been murdered. In the new one, he was still alive and he did
remember being killed. BTW, sometime during the book, the time travelers >>>>> became aware of him.
Murder in Metachronopolis by John C. Wright?
But it was first published in 2010 (isfdb).
It is the first story in City Beyond Time sub titled TALES OF THE FALL >>>> OF METACHRONOPOLIS.
Somehow the subtitle's significance eluded me until now. No wonder the
non-novel's non-sequitural narrative was incoherent.
You have lost me. I do not understand the above comment.
Sorry, sometimes strange sentences slip out when my recreational word
play gets the better of me.
The plot knottiness in MURDER IN METACHRONOPOLIS (MiM) made an
impression on me over a decade ago when it was first read. When you
mentioned above how MiM is but one short story in a collection, a
hypothesis immediately jumped to mind of incoherence caused by
inadvertently reading the collection as if it were a novel.
But, no, when listening to it again during last night's dog walk
on icy streets, it became clear how easy it is to discern the short
stories that follow MiM. The problem irrefutably lies within the
intricately dense, Van Vogtish, MiM plot. Perhaps it over-stimulates
my mind. Regardless, it's too complex for me to grasp in a single
hearing or reading.
THE GOLDEN OECUMENE trilogy by Wright worked the same way. It
required repetitive readings (eg hearings) to fully understand.
MiM subheads each story snippet with a random integer. What are
they supposed to be? Something similar to nexus markers for THE GARDEN
OF FORKING PATHS by Borges? Are readers supposed to put them in order
to make sense of the plot? Such questions come to mind when MiM's either heard or read.
Don wrote:
THE GOLDEN OECUMENE trilogy by Wright worked the same way. It
required repetitive readings (eg hearings) to fully understand.
MiM subheads each story snippet with a random integer. What are
they supposed to be? Something similar to nexus markers for THE GARDEN
OF FORKING PATHS by Borges? Are readers supposed to put them in order
to make sense of the plot? Such questions come to mind when MiM's either
heard or read.
The numbers heading the story snippets state the chronological order of events. I suspect that I would not have been able to follow the story if
I had listened to it rather than reading it. When I became confused when reading, it was a simple task to get back on track by rereading parts numbered one before or one after the current heading number
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 24:26:35 |
| Calls: | 117 |
| Calls today: | 117 |
| Files: | 368 |
| D/L today: |
560 files (257M bytes) |
| Messages: | 70,932 |
| Posted today: | 26 |