• It's what self interest does to a Prime Minister with low intelligence.

    From Tony@3:633/10 to All on Monday, March 16, 2026 00:27:28
    https://waikanaewatch.org/2026/03/16/we-need-the-marsden-point-refinery-now/
    An incompetent and selfish decision.

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.13
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Crash@3:633/10 to All on Monday, March 16, 2026 17:17:10
    Subject: Re: It's what self interest does to a Prime Minister with low intelligence.

    On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:27:28 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    https://waikanaewatch.org/2026/03/16/we-need-the-marsden-point-refinery-now/ >An incompetent and selfish decision.

    Except for a major lie in that article. The Marsden Pt refinery was
    not closed by any Government - it was closed by the owners. The case
    for refining crude oil onshore was never strong, made weaker when
    Asian economies could get refined product cheaper to distribution
    points around NZ than the refinery could.

    There are few sources of the crude oil that the refinery could handle.
    There are many more sources of refined product that we get today. When
    the refinery was built, all suppliers of petrol/diesel etc in NZ were
    required to use Marsden Pt output (importation was not permitted).
    There was never any justification for building the refinery other than
    creating local jobs at the expense of sourcing cheaper petrol in a
    free market.

    The reality is that Gull in particular demonstrated that they could
    supply the NZ market cheaper then the companies that owned Marsden Pt.
    When the refinery was closed, its owners joined the same business
    model as Gull (and NPD, originally also Challenge). Our supply lines
    are more diverse for refined versus crude. The refineries used now
    will almost certainly have access to stockpiled crude oil so that the
    refinery can survive crude oil supply crunches.

    Yes the Labour Governments of 2017-2023 made pointless decisions that restricted local exploration but the presence or absence of a refinery
    in NZ is not relevant.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.13
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Gordon@3:633/10 to All on Monday, March 16, 2026 07:25:20
    Subject: Re: It's what self interest does to a Prime Minister with low intelligence.

    On 2026-03-16, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:27:28 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    https://waikanaewatch.org/2026/03/16/we-need-the-marsden-point-refinery-now/ >>An incompetent and selfish decision.

    Except for a major lie in that article. The Marsden Pt refinery was
    not closed by any Government - it was closed by the owners. The case
    for refining crude oil onshore was never strong, made weaker when
    Asian economies could get refined product cheaper to distribution
    points around NZ than the refinery could.

    There are few sources of the crude oil that the refinery could handle.
    There are many more sources of refined product that we get today. When
    the refinery was built, all suppliers of petrol/diesel etc in NZ were required to use Marsden Pt output (importation was not permitted).
    There was never any justification for building the refinery other than creating local jobs at the expense of sourcing cheaper petrol in a
    free market.

    The refinery was built (1962 - 1964) in the days before Rogernomics

    The reality is that Gull in particular demonstrated that they could
    supply the NZ market cheaper then the companies that owned Marsden Pt.
    When the refinery was closed, its owners joined the same business
    model as Gull (and NPD, originally also Challenge). Our supply lines
    are more diverse for refined versus crude. The refineries used now
    will almost certainly have access to stockpiled crude oil so that the refinery can survive crude oil supply crunches.

    Yes the Labour Governments of 2017-2023 made pointless decisions that restricted local exploration but the presence or absence of a refinery
    in NZ is not relevant.

    We need to remember that the worold was a different place when the refinery
    was built.

    NZ having a refinery does not help a great deal as A) You need to import the crude and it needs to be the right crude.

    Oil is shipped all over the planet, some ot it will need to go on a slight detour.

    Remember the oil shocks of the early 70's. NZ did not run out of oil even
    with OPEC in control of the oil.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/589684/average-91-petrol-price-surges-past-3-as-willis-slams-ev-subsidies
    "I simply don't accept the idea that giving subsidies to millionaires in Remuera would help those afflicted by high petrol prices," Willis said.

    Bulleye.

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.13
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Mutley@3:633/10 to All on Tuesday, March 17, 2026 08:48:32
    Subject: Re: It's what self interest does to a Prime Minister with low intelligence.

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:

    On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:27:28 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    https://waikanaewatch.org/2026/03/16/we-need-the-marsden-point-refinery-now/ >>An incompetent and selfish decision.

    Except for a major lie in that article. The Marsden Pt refinery was
    not closed by any Government - it was closed by the owners. The case
    for refining crude oil onshore was never strong, made weaker when
    Asian economies could get refined product cheaper to distribution
    points around NZ than the refinery could.

    There are few sources of the crude oil that the refinery could handle.
    There are many more sources of refined product that we get today. When
    the refinery was built, all suppliers of petrol/diesel etc in NZ were >required to use Marsden Pt output (importation was not permitted).
    There was never any justification for building the refinery other than >creating local jobs at the expense of sourcing cheaper petrol in a
    free market.

    The reality is that Gull in particular demonstrated that they could
    supply the NZ market cheaper then the companies that owned Marsden Pt.
    When the refinery was closed, its owners joined the same business
    model as Gull (and NPD, originally also Challenge). Our supply lines
    are more diverse for refined versus crude. The refineries used now
    will almost certainly have access to stockpiled crude oil so that the >refinery can survive crude oil supply crunches.

    Yes the Labour Governments of 2017-2023 made pointless decisions that >restricted local exploration but the presence or absence of a refinery
    in NZ is not relevant.

    Yes it was closed by the owners and the government should have
    interleaved and stopped it or bought it back but Liebor hated fossil
    fuels so didn't care.

    People who worked there said after the closure that by blending
    import crude and local stuff we could have refined our own fuel not
    always reliant on import crude.

    It also could re-refine aviation fuel that was contaminated on
    arrive as has been done in the past now we have to send it back to
    Ozz at a cost .

    We produced out own bitumen road paving and CO2 for the food industry
    now all this has the be imported as well.

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.13
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Crash@3:633/10 to All on Tuesday, March 17, 2026 09:24:44
    Subject: Re: It's what self interest does to a Prime Minister with low intelligence.

    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:48:32 +1300, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:

    On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:27:28 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    https://waikanaewatch.org/2026/03/16/we-need-the-marsden-point-refinery-now/ >>>An incompetent and selfish decision.

    Except for a major lie in that article. The Marsden Pt refinery was
    not closed by any Government - it was closed by the owners. The case
    for refining crude oil onshore was never strong, made weaker when
    Asian economies could get refined product cheaper to distribution
    points around NZ than the refinery could.

    There are few sources of the crude oil that the refinery could handle. >>There are many more sources of refined product that we get today. When
    the refinery was built, all suppliers of petrol/diesel etc in NZ were >>required to use Marsden Pt output (importation was not permitted).
    There was never any justification for building the refinery other than >>creating local jobs at the expense of sourcing cheaper petrol in a
    free market.

    The reality is that Gull in particular demonstrated that they could
    supply the NZ market cheaper then the companies that owned Marsden Pt.
    When the refinery was closed, its owners joined the same business
    model as Gull (and NPD, originally also Challenge). Our supply lines
    are more diverse for refined versus crude. The refineries used now
    will almost certainly have access to stockpiled crude oil so that the >>refinery can survive crude oil supply crunches.

    Yes the Labour Governments of 2017-2023 made pointless decisions that >>restricted local exploration but the presence or absence of a refinery
    in NZ is not relevant.

    Yes it was closed by the owners and the government should have
    interleaved and stopped it or bought it back but Liebor hated fossil
    fuels so didn't care.

    People who worked there said after the closure that by blending
    import crude and local stuff we could have refined our own fuel not
    always reliant on import crude.

    It also could re-refine aviation fuel that was contaminated on
    arrive as has been done in the past now we have to send it back to
    Ozz at a cost .

    We produced out own bitumen road paving and CO2 for the food industry
    now all this has the be imported as well.

    None of this justifies Government ownership or intervention. The
    fallacy of manufacturing locally when product can be imported cheaper
    than we can import and process is now long gone.

    We have no supply crisis yet. We can stockpile refined product
    inexactly the same way as we could have stockpiled crude oil. Local
    crude oil is not at all suitable for refining to produce petrol and
    diesel.

    NZ car assembly industry fell apart once import protections on
    built-up vehicles was done away with and we now have cheaper cars on
    the road of better quality because of it.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.13
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Crash@3:633/10 to All on Tuesday, March 17, 2026 14:36:21
    Subject: Re: It's what self interest does to a Prime Minister with low intelligence.

    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:39:33 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:

    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
    People who worked there said after the closure that by blending
    import crude and local stuff we could have refined our own fuel not >>>always reliant on import crude.

    It also could re-refine aviation fuel that was contaminated on
    arrive as has been done in the past now we have to send it back to >>>Ozz at a cost .

    We produced out own bitumen road paving and CO2 for the food industry >>>now all this has the be imported as well.

    None of this justifies Government ownership or intervention.

    Aw, just to say that Crash misses the huge point of national industry
    and self-sufficiency. We should be able to keep our infrastructure
    going even if all overseas trade vanishes.

    That was a policy largely followed by our Government from the start.

    Up until the 1980's importation of goods and services was strictly
    controlled, to the point that some manufactured goods had to be
    imported as parts and assembled here. Do you not recall the days when
    Ozzie beer was not allowed, there was just one brand of home
    appliances, quality Japanese audio systems were not allowed and
    refined petrol/diesel was also not allowed. We had a closed system
    then, and what we could get was poor quality because of monopoly
    supply.

    Who wants to lose our
    electricity or fuel, when we could keep them going?

    Scare mongering in the extreme. The petrol retailers have ample and
    diverse sources of supply. Are you suggesting they will simply allow
    their port storage facilities to run dry, followed by their retail
    outlets. That is financial suicide and is unlikely ever to happen.

    First we should
    establish and maintain our self-sufficiency, then add imports &
    exports to that as a luxury, not a necessity, as much as possible.

    Great theory, but in practice this means locally-made products of poor
    quality and value.

    Mutley is totally right to say government should have intervened and
    even nationalised the refinery when it closed -- it was a strategic
    industry. They should rebuild it even now to refine our own drilled >petroleum.

    That possibility evaporated with the defeat of RD Muldoon in the 1984
    election, and your assertion indicates you do not have lived
    experience of living in this country before 1984.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.13
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)