https://waikanaewatch.org/2026/03/16/we-need-the-marsden-point-refinery-now/ >An incompetent and selfish decision.
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:27:28 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://waikanaewatch.org/2026/03/16/we-need-the-marsden-point-refinery-now/ >>An incompetent and selfish decision.
Except for a major lie in that article. The Marsden Pt refinery was
not closed by any Government - it was closed by the owners. The case
for refining crude oil onshore was never strong, made weaker when
Asian economies could get refined product cheaper to distribution
points around NZ than the refinery could.
There are few sources of the crude oil that the refinery could handle.
There are many more sources of refined product that we get today. When
the refinery was built, all suppliers of petrol/diesel etc in NZ were required to use Marsden Pt output (importation was not permitted).
There was never any justification for building the refinery other than creating local jobs at the expense of sourcing cheaper petrol in a
free market.
The reality is that Gull in particular demonstrated that they could
supply the NZ market cheaper then the companies that owned Marsden Pt.
When the refinery was closed, its owners joined the same business
model as Gull (and NPD, originally also Challenge). Our supply lines
are more diverse for refined versus crude. The refineries used now
will almost certainly have access to stockpiled crude oil so that the refinery can survive crude oil supply crunches.
Yes the Labour Governments of 2017-2023 made pointless decisions that restricted local exploration but the presence or absence of a refinery
in NZ is not relevant.
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:27:28 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://waikanaewatch.org/2026/03/16/we-need-the-marsden-point-refinery-now/ >>An incompetent and selfish decision.
Except for a major lie in that article. The Marsden Pt refinery was
not closed by any Government - it was closed by the owners. The case
for refining crude oil onshore was never strong, made weaker when
Asian economies could get refined product cheaper to distribution
points around NZ than the refinery could.
There are few sources of the crude oil that the refinery could handle.
There are many more sources of refined product that we get today. When
the refinery was built, all suppliers of petrol/diesel etc in NZ were >required to use Marsden Pt output (importation was not permitted).
There was never any justification for building the refinery other than >creating local jobs at the expense of sourcing cheaper petrol in a
free market.
The reality is that Gull in particular demonstrated that they could
supply the NZ market cheaper then the companies that owned Marsden Pt.
When the refinery was closed, its owners joined the same business
model as Gull (and NPD, originally also Challenge). Our supply lines
are more diverse for refined versus crude. The refineries used now
will almost certainly have access to stockpiled crude oil so that the >refinery can survive crude oil supply crunches.
Yes the Labour Governments of 2017-2023 made pointless decisions that >restricted local exploration but the presence or absence of a refinery
in NZ is not relevant.
Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:27:28 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://waikanaewatch.org/2026/03/16/we-need-the-marsden-point-refinery-now/ >>>An incompetent and selfish decision.
Except for a major lie in that article. The Marsden Pt refinery was
not closed by any Government - it was closed by the owners. The case
for refining crude oil onshore was never strong, made weaker when
Asian economies could get refined product cheaper to distribution
points around NZ than the refinery could.
There are few sources of the crude oil that the refinery could handle. >>There are many more sources of refined product that we get today. When
the refinery was built, all suppliers of petrol/diesel etc in NZ were >>required to use Marsden Pt output (importation was not permitted).
There was never any justification for building the refinery other than >>creating local jobs at the expense of sourcing cheaper petrol in a
free market.
The reality is that Gull in particular demonstrated that they could
supply the NZ market cheaper then the companies that owned Marsden Pt.
When the refinery was closed, its owners joined the same business
model as Gull (and NPD, originally also Challenge). Our supply lines
are more diverse for refined versus crude. The refineries used now
will almost certainly have access to stockpiled crude oil so that the >>refinery can survive crude oil supply crunches.
Yes the Labour Governments of 2017-2023 made pointless decisions that >>restricted local exploration but the presence or absence of a refinery
in NZ is not relevant.
Yes it was closed by the owners and the government should have
interleaved and stopped it or bought it back but Liebor hated fossil
fuels so didn't care.
People who worked there said after the closure that by blending
import crude and local stuff we could have refined our own fuel not
always reliant on import crude.
It also could re-refine aviation fuel that was contaminated on
arrive as has been done in the past now we have to send it back to
Ozz at a cost .
We produced out own bitumen road paving and CO2 for the food industry
now all this has the be imported as well.
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
People who worked there said after the closure that by blending
import crude and local stuff we could have refined our own fuel not >>>always reliant on import crude.
It also could re-refine aviation fuel that was contaminated on
arrive as has been done in the past now we have to send it back to >>>Ozz at a cost .
We produced out own bitumen road paving and CO2 for the food industry >>>now all this has the be imported as well.
None of this justifies Government ownership or intervention.
Aw, just to say that Crash misses the huge point of national industry
and self-sufficiency. We should be able to keep our infrastructure
going even if all overseas trade vanishes.
Who wants to lose our
electricity or fuel, when we could keep them going?
First we should
establish and maintain our self-sufficiency, then add imports &
exports to that as a luxury, not a necessity, as much as possible.
Mutley is totally right to say government should have intervened and
even nationalised the refinery when it closed -- it was a strategic
industry. They should rebuild it even now to refine our own drilled >petroleum.
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 116:02:35 |
| Calls: | 125 |
| Calls today: | 125 |
| Files: | 489 |
| D/L today: |
856 files (365M bytes) |
| Messages: | 76,423 |
| Posted today: | 26 |