• CD ripping

    From Lee@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 01:00:01
    Which program do you use for ripping a music cd?
    It seems like I've got lots of choices:
    $ apt search paranoia
    abcde/stable 2.9.3-1 all
    A Better CD Encoder
    cd-paranoia/stable 10.2+2.0.2-1+b1 amd64
    audio CD reading utility which includes extra data verification features cdparanoia/stable 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64
    audio extraction tool for sampling CDs
    jack/stable 4~git20241202.3410dc1-2 all
    Rip and encode CDs with one command
    libcdio-paranoia-dev/stable 10.2+2.0.2-1+b1 amd64
    library to read digital audio CDs with error correction (development
    files)
    libcdio-paranoia2t64/stable,now 10.2+2.0.2-1+b1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
    library to read digital audio CDs with error correction
    libcdio-utils/stable 2.2.0-4.1~deb13u1 amd64
    sample applications based on the CDIO libraries
    libcdparanoia-dev/stable 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64
    audio extraction tool for sampling CDs (development) libcdparanoia0/stable,now 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
    audio extraction tool for sampling CDs (library) liblwpx-paranoidagent-perl/stable 1.12-3 all
    "paranoid" subclass of LWP::UserAgent
    libpapi7.1t64/stable 7.1.0-5+b1 amd64
    PAPI runtime (shared libraries)
    ripit/stable 4.0.0~rc20161009-1 all
    Textbased audio CD ripper
    ripperx/stable 2.8.0-4+b1 amd64
    GTK-based audio CD ripper/encoder
    ruby-paranoia/stable 3.0.0-1 all
    re-implementation of acts_as_paranoid for Rails 3
    yaret/stable 2.1.0-6 all
    console tool to turn CDs into encoded music
    Which one is the best?
    On windows the choice was easy.. Exact Audio Copy (EAC) + LAME
    I found instructions for running EAC with WINE. Is that better than any 'native' app?
    Thanks
    Lee


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From ?ar?nas Burdulis@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 04:10:01
    On 2026-06-04 18:57, Lee wrote:
    Which program do you use for ripping a music cd?

    k3b (to FLAC).

    Haven't looked for alternatives for years.

    --
    ?ar?nas Burdulis
    Dartmouth Mathematics
    https://math.dartmouth.edu/~sarunas

    ú https://useplaintext.email ú


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Lee@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 04:40:01
    On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:38?PM Eben King wrote:
    On 6/4/26 18:57, Lee wrote:

    Previously I used

    abcde/stable 2.9.3-1 all
    A Better CD Encoder

    but recently I went to rip some more, and abcde wasn't installed, so I used

    hrmmm... you didn't install abcde. Should I read something into that?
    Like it wasn't all that great?
    cdparanoia/stable 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64
    audio extraction tool for sampling CDs

    what makes that option so much fun is there's a cdparanoia and a
    cd-paranoia.
    Is there an actual difference or is this yet another instance of someone
    being too [something] to fix whatever so they write another version of the program from scratch?
    (& why is re-implementing something such a thing in linux??)
    I don't do it often, so I haven't really compared the lot of 'em.

    On windows the choice was easy.. Exact Audio Copy (EAC) + LAME
    I found instructions for running EAC with WINE. Is that better than any 'native' app?

    I have not used EAC but I avoid WINE if there's a native app.

    Which is what I'm trying to do. I haven't installed wine yet, but EAC
    might change my mind. And Irfanview. Why the **** isn't there an open
    source view pretty much any image program for linux? xnview is free, but
    not opensource, so I'm still looking for an image viewer ..
    In any case, thanks for the info!!
    Regards,
    Lee


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Charlie Gibbs@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 04:40:01
    On Fri, 05 Jun 2026 01:00:01 +0200 Lee <ler762@gmail.com> wrote:

    Which program do you use for ripping a music cd?

    It seems like I've got lots of choices:

    Here's the little script I use.
    I call it "cd2mp3" - the name says it all.

    # Rip MP3s from a CD - version 2023-04-21
    cdparanoia -B
    #cdda2wav -D /dev/cdrom -x -B -O wav
    #icedax -D /dev/sr0 -x -B -O wav
    for t in *.wav; do lame $t; done

    As you may have noticed, I experimented with a couple of
    other programs (cdda2wav and icedax), but finally returned
    to good old cdparanoia. It works well, and tries really
    hard if it's dealing with a damaged CD.

    --
    /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Life is perverse.
    \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | It can be beautiful -
    X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | but it won't.
    / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Lily Tomlin

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Lee@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 04:50:01
    On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 10:01?PM ?ar?nas Burdulis wrote:
    On 2026-06-04 18:57, Lee wrote:


    Which program do you use for ripping a music cd?

    k3b (to FLAC).

    Cool. Another item to add to my list of things to check out
    Thanks
    Lee


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Dan Ritter@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 05:10:01
    Lee wrote:
    On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:38?PM Eben King wrote:

    cdparanoia/stable 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64
    audio extraction tool for sampling CDs

    what makes that option so much fun is there's a cdparanoia and a
    cd-paranoia.
    Is there an actual difference or is this yet another instance of someone being too [something] to fix whatever so they write another version of the program from scratch?


    cd-paranoia with a dash says:

    This version uses the libcdio library for interaction with a CD-ROM drive.
    The jitter and error correction however are the same as used in Xiph's
    cdparanoia.



    (& why is re-implementing something such a thing in linux??)

    Open source and no central control.


    On windows the choice was easy.. Exact Audio Copy (EAC) + LAME
    I found instructions for running EAC with WINE. Is that better than any 'native' app?

    No.

    might change my mind. And Irfanview. Why the **** isn't there an open source view pretty much any image program for linux? xnview is free, but
    not opensource, so I'm still looking for an image viewer ..


    eog - eye of GNOME
    eom - eye of MATE
    ephoto - Enlightened image viewer
    feh - fast, lightweight image viewer
    gthumb - advanced image viewer and browser
    gwenview - for KDE
    imview - Image viewing and analysis
    ... and on through the alphabet.

    Try "apt search image view"

    -dsr-

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Jan Claeys@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 05:50:02
    On Thu, 2026-06-04 at 18:57 -0400, Lee wrote:
    Which program do you use for ripping a music cd?

    I?ve used several programs over the years. In addition to the stuf
    f
    you listed, maybe also look at 'abcde', 'whipper', 'grimripper', ?
    (there are many more, and most are user interfaces for the "paranoia" library/code, so searching for anything that has a dependency on
    *paranoia* should get you a fairly complete list).


    On windows the choice was easy.. Exact Audio Copy (EAC) + LAME
    I found instructions for running EAC with WINE.ÿ Is that better than
    any 'native' app?

    I think EAC is still the ?gold standard?, but anything dire
    ctly or
    indirectly based on "paranoia" is pretty good too.


    --
    Jan Claeys

    (please don't CC me when replying to the list)

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Charles Curley@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 06:20:01
    On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 18:57:59 -0400
    Lee <ler762@gmail.com> wrote:

    Which program do you use for ripping a music cd?

    Not even on your list: asunder. It's a GTK+ front end for ripping CDs
    and using lame to convert from wav to *.

    --
    Does anybody read signatures any more?

    https://charlescurley.com
    https://charlescurley.com/blog/

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Timothy M Butterworth@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 07:40:01
    On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 10:03?PM Lee <ler762@gmail.com> wrote:
    Which program do you use for ripping a music cd?

    It seems like I've got lots of choices:

    $ apt search paranoia
    abcde/stable 2.9.3-1 all
    A Better CD Encoder

    cd-paranoia/stable 10.2+2.0.2-1+b1 amd64
    audio CD reading utility which includes extra data verification features

    cdparanoia/stable 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64
    audio extraction tool for sampling CDs

    jack/stable 4~git20241202.3410dc1-2 all
    Rip and encode CDs with one command

    libcdio-paranoia-dev/stable 10.2+2.0.2-1+b1 amd64
    library to read digital audio CDs with error correction (development
    files)

    libcdio-paranoia2t64/stable,now 10.2+2.0.2-1+b1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
    library to read digital audio CDs with error correction

    libcdio-utils/stable 2.2.0-4.1~deb13u1 amd64
    sample applications based on the CDIO libraries

    libcdparanoia-dev/stable 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64
    audio extraction tool for sampling CDs (development)

    libcdparanoia0/stable,now 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
    audio extraction tool for sampling CDs (library)

    liblwpx-paranoidagent-perl/stable 1.12-3 all
    "paranoid" subclass of LWP::UserAgent

    libpapi7.1t64/stable 7.1.0-5+b1 amd64
    PAPI runtime (shared libraries)

    ripit/stable 4.0.0~rc20161009-1 all
    Textbased audio CD ripper

    ripperx/stable 2.8.0-4+b1 amd64
    GTK-based audio CD ripper/encoder

    ruby-paranoia/stable 3.0.0-1 all
    re-implementation of acts_as_paranoid for Rails 3

    yaret/stable 2.1.0-6 all
    console tool to turn CDs into encoded music

    Which one is the best?

    If you are using GNOME then:
    sound-juicer/stable 3.40.0-3 amd64
    GNOME CD Ripper
    If you are using KDE then:
    k3b/stable 25.04.0-1 amd64
    Sophisticated CD/DVD burning application
    I personally use Sound Converter
    soundconverter/stable 4.0.6-2 all
    GNOME application to convert audio files into other formats


    On windows the choice was easy.. Exact Audio Copy (EAC) + LAME
    I found instructions for running EAC with WINE. Is that better than any 'native' app?

    Thanks
    Lee


    --
    ???????
    ??????? Debian - The universal operating system
    ??????? https://www.debian.org/
    ?????


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Peter Nacken@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 08:10:01
    Hi Lee,
    since years I use grip https://sourceforge.net/projects/grip/
    Peter
    Am 05.06.26 um 00:57 schrieb Lee:
    Which program do you use for ripping a music cd?

    It seems like I've got lots of choices:

    $ apt search paranoia
    abcde/stable 2.9.3-1 all
    ? A Better CD Encoder

    cd-paranoia/stable 10.2+2.0.2-1+b1 amd64
    ? audio CD reading utility which includes extra data verification features

    cdparanoia/stable 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64
    ? audio extraction tool for sampling CDs

    jack/stable 4~git20241202.3410dc1-2 all
    ? Rip and encode CDs with one command

    libcdio-paranoia-dev/stable 10.2+2.0.2-1+b1 amd64
    ? library to read digital audio CDs with error correction (development files)

    libcdio-paranoia2t64/stable,now 10.2+2.0.2-1+b1 amd64
    [installed,automatic]
    ? library to read digital audio CDs with error correction

    libcdio-utils/stable 2.2.0-4.1~deb13u1 amd64
    ? sample applications based on the CDIO libraries

    libcdparanoia-dev/stable 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64
    ? audio extraction tool for sampling CDs (development)

    libcdparanoia0/stable,now 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64 [installed,automatic]
    ? audio extraction tool for sampling CDs (library)

    liblwpx-paranoidagent-perl/stable 1.12-3 all
    ? "paranoid" subclass of LWP::UserAgent

    libpapi7.1t64/stable 7.1.0-5+b1 amd64
    ? PAPI runtime (shared libraries)

    ripit/stable 4.0.0~rc20161009-1 all
    ? Textbased audio CD ripper

    ripperx/stable 2.8.0-4+b1 amd64
    ? GTK-based audio CD ripper/encoder

    ruby-paranoia/stable 3.0.0-1 all
    ? re-implementation of acts_as_paranoid for Rails 3

    yaret/stable 2.1.0-6 all
    ? console tool to turn CDs into encoded music

    Which one is the best?

    On windows the choice was easy.. Exact Audio Copy (EAC)?+ LAME
    I found instructions for running EAC with WINE.? Is that better than
    any 'native' app?

    Thanks
    Lee



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From tomas@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 08:10:02
    On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 10:52:27PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
    Lee wrote:
    On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:38?PM Eben King wrote:
    [...]
    (& why is re-implementing something such a thing in linux??)

    Open source and no central control.
    The first part of the answer deserves a bit more: "open source" [1]
    makes that easy. You can mix and match bits and pieces of other
    programs to make that one you like and haven't found yet.
    And since there's not "the best", but "the best for you and
    folks alike", this is a Good Thing :-)
    Cheers
    [1] I prefer to spell that as "free software" ;)
    --
    t


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Lee@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 08:10:02
    On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 10:52?PM Dan Ritter wrote:
    Lee wrote:
    On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:38?PM Eben King wrote:

    cdparanoia/stable 3.10.2+debian-14+b1 amd64
    audio extraction tool for sampling CDs

    what makes that option so much fun is there's a cdparanoia and a
    cd-paranoia.
    Is there an actual difference or is this yet another instance of someone being too [something] to fix whatever so they write another version of
    the
    program from scratch?

    cd-paranoia with a dash says:

    This version uses the libcdio library for interaction with a CD-ROM drive.
    The jitter and error correction however are the same as used in Xiph's
    cdparanoia.

    I moved from programming to networking decades ago. So my ability to read
    code leaves much to be desired :(
    I'm sure that if I knew what I was doing I'd know, or be able to figure
    out, the difference between libcdio and whatever cdparanoia uses.. but
    maybe I'll get lucky and find a comparison by Someone Who Knows what all
    the difference is.
    OK.. I realize this is what I signed up for when I switched to Debian (or
    open source in general), but it would be nice if it was a bit easier.
    I'm still adjusting to the expectation of being able to read code to answer most any questions you have.
    (& why is re-implementing something such a thing in linux??)

    Open source and no central control.

    Which begs the question of why the person/people supporting the original program don't cherry pick the neat ideas from the new version and
    incorporate them into the original version.
    For example, I don't understand why Apache is supporting openoffice. OK.. Oracle was trying to dump it & Apache taking it was probably the best
    option. But why is Apache still supporting openoffice? Most of the
    Openoffice people told Oracle to buzz off & they forked libre office. Why
    do we still have open office years later???
    On windows the choice was easy.. Exact Audio Copy (EAC) + LAME
    I found instructions for running EAC with WINE. Is that better than
    any
    'native' app?

    No.

    Because?
    might change my mind. And Irfanview. Why the **** isn't there an open
    source view pretty much any image program for linux? xnview is free, but not opensource, so I'm still looking for an image viewer ..


    <.. snip list ..>
    ... and on through the alphabet.

    Try "apt search image view"

    I did that and more. I was so sick of the process that when I found xnview
    I quit looking - even though xnview isn't open source.
    For whatever it's worth, Irfanview supports all this:
    https://www.irfanview.com/main_formats.htm
    It'd be nice if I could find something comparable. That could also do
    obscure sound files.
    I've still got some SunOS .au files from decades ago & some midi files that
    are probably decades old also.
    and yet another FWIW:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xv_(software)
    While popular in the early 1990s ("XV is widely considered to be the
    preeminent image viewer for the X Window System"[2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xv_(software)#cite_note-2>), ...
    I haven't found anything like that for Linux (& preferably Debian)
    Regards,
    Lee


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Lee@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 08:20:01
    On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 11:40?PM Jan Claeys wrote:
    On Thu, 2026-06-04 at 18:57 -0400, Lee wrote:
    Which program do you use for ripping a music cd?

    I?ve used several programs over the years. In addition to the stuff
    you listed, maybe also look at 'abcde', 'whipper', 'grimripper', ?
    (there are many more, and most are user interfaces for the "paranoia" library/code, so searching for anything that has a dependency on
    *paranoia* should get you a fairly complete list).

    OK - thanks!
    On windows the choice was easy.. Exact Audio Copy (EAC) + LAME
    I found instructions for running EAC with WINE. Is that better than
    any 'native' app?

    I think EAC is still the ?gold standard?, but anything directly or
    indirectly based on "paranoia" is pretty good too.

    Sounds good. I'll start trying programs based on "paranoia"
    Thanks
    Lee


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Lee@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 08:20:01
    On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 12:14?AM Charles Curley wrote:
    On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 18:57:59 -0400
    Lee wrote:

    Which program do you use for ripping a music cd?

    Not even on your list: asunder. It's a GTK+ front end for ripping CDs
    and using lame to convert from wav to *.

    OK.. another one on my list of programs to check
    Thanks,
    Lee

    --
    Does anybody read signatures any more?

    I do :)


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Loris Bennett@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 08:50:01
    Lee <ler762@gmail.com> writes:

    [snip (34 lines)]

    For example, I don't understand why Apache is supporting openoffice. OK.. Oracle was trying to dump it & Apache
    taking it was probably the best option. But why is Apache still supporting openoffice? Most of the Openoffice
    people told Oracle to buzz off & they forked libre office. Why do we still have open office years later???

    I remember hearing may years ago that the continued existence of OpenOffice
    was do to some contractual obligations on the part of IBM towards some of
    their customers. The Wikipedia page[1] states that OpenOffice is the designated successor of IBM Lotus Symphony, so that seems to be the
    connection.

    I wondered whether any of those IBM customers really are still using OpenOffice, but I guess it is probably just baked into some legacy systems.

    Cheers,

    Loris

    Footnotes:
    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice

    --
    Dr. Loris Bennett (Herr/Mr)
    FUB-IT, Freie Universit„t Berlin

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Lee@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 09:50:01
    On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 2:48?AM Loris Bennett wrote:
    Lee writes:

    [snip (34 lines)]

    For example, I don't understand why Apache is supporting openoffice.
    OK.. Oracle was trying to dump it & Apache
    taking it was probably the best option. But why is Apache still
    supporting openoffice? Most of the Openoffice
    people told Oracle to buzz off & they forked libre office. Why do we
    still have open office years later???

    I remember hearing may years ago that the continued existence of OpenOffice was do to some contractual obligations on the part of IBM towards some of their customers. The Wikipedia page[1] states that OpenOffice is the designated successor of IBM Lotus Symphony, so that seems to be the connection.

    I wondered whether any of those IBM customers really are still using OpenOffice, but I guess it is probably just baked into some legacy systems.

    I hope nobody is using OpenOffice now.

    Cheers,

    Loris

    Footnotes:
    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice

    OhNoes!! from your wikipedia link:
    "Difficulties maintaining a sufficient number of active developers and code contributors to keep the project viable have persisted for several years.
    This has led to persistent problems providing timely fixes to security vulnerabilities <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulnerability_(computing)>
    since 2015. In March 2026, the Apache Security Team raised OpenOffice's security risk status to "red" due to unfixed vulnerabilities over 365 days old."
    and further on down:
    In September 2016, OpenOffice's project management committee chair Dennis Hamilton began a discussion of possibly discontinuing the project, after
    the Apache board had put them on monthly reporting due to the project's
    ongoing problems handling security issues.
    Seems long past time to retire OpenOffice.
    Lee


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Andreas Ronnquist@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 13:10:03
    On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 02:17:34 -0400,
    Lee<ler762@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 12:14?AM Charles Curley wrote:

    On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 18:57:59 -0400
    Lee wrote:

    Which program do you use for ripping a music cd?

    Not even on your list: asunder. It's a GTK+ front end for ripping CDs
    and using lame to convert from wav to *.


    OK.. another one on my list of programs to check

    Thanks,
    Lee


    Check out grimripper too, it's packaged in Debian, and is basically a
    GTK3 fork of asunder (which is GTK2). As you might know GTK2 is on it's
    way out of Debian, so I believe asunder won't be present in forky and
    later.

    There's however talk about other ports to GTK3 of asunder [1], and
    actually, work being done on an supported version of GTK2 [2][3]. So the
    future is indeed interesting.

    /A

    1: https://github.com/rizalmart/asunder-gtk3
    2: https://git.devuan.org/Daemonratte/gtk2-ng
    3: https://devuanusers.com/thread-gtk2-revival-thread--80

    -- Andreas R”nnquist
    mailinglists@gusnan.se
    andreas@ronnquist.net

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Dan Ritter@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 17:00:01
    Lee wrote:
    On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 10:52?PM Dan Ritter wrote:
    (& why is re-implementing something such a thing in linux??)

    Open source and no central control.


    Which begs the question of why the person/people supporting the original program don't cherry pick the neat ideas from the new version and
    incorporate them into the original version.

    That's the nature of humanity. Different people have different
    opinions:

    when project A almost but not quite fits your vision,
    and the maintainers of project A don't share your visoon,
    and the license of project A allows for forking

    pretty soon there is project A-prime.

    Sometimes, people being people, A-prime becomes the one that
    everybody uses. Sometimes A-prime has only scratched the itch of
    the person who forked A, and nobody hears about it again. And
    sometimes the folks who work on A and A-prime discover that they
    weren't really so far apart, and the projects re-merge.

    On windows the choice was easy.. Exact Audio Copy (EAC) + LAME
    I found instructions for running EAC with WINE. Is that better than
    any
    'native' app?

    No.


    Because?

    Adding more software means increasing the number of bugs. Since
    the goal is to get the digital encoding off of a potentially
    lossy, timing-sensitive, slightly but not completely
    error-corrected optical disk with all sorts of different reading
    hardware, adding layers is bad.


    I did that and more. I was so sick of the process that when I found xnview
    I quit looking - even though xnview isn't open source.

    OK. You get to make your choices. Debian offers you lots of
    choices, and you don't even have to limit yourself to what
    Debian packages.

    When you ask a question like the one you just did, you get
    answers like the one you just did.



    It'd be nice if I could find something comparable. That could also do obscure sound files.

    I'm not sure why you would want your image viewer to also be a
    dessert topping and floor wax, but whatever.


    I've still got some SunOS .au files from decades ago & some midi files that are probably decades old also.

    sox or ffmpeg will convert your .au files.

    fluidsynth and some soundfonts will play your midi files.

    -dsr-


    --
    https://randomstring.org/~dsr/eula.html is binding upon you.
    [Set the new password to "swordfish". Please repeat everything three times.]

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From James H. H. Lampert@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 18:20:02
    Hmm. It's been a while since the last time I mounted an audio CD on a
    computer (I have stereo systems and a portable DVD player for that), but
    as I recall, whenever I did, the tracks simply showed up as .aiff files.

    And on the rare occasions when I've actually needed to convert them for
    some other purpose (scoring a video, or creating a ringtone for my
    cellular phone), I was always able to find something to do it.

    As to going the other way, I have a CD-R machine in my stereo system for
    that, along with plenty of blanks that are coded to work in it. Along
    with various CD-burning software.

    --
    JHHL

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Stefan Monnier@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 18:30:01
    On windows the choice was easy.. Exact Audio Copy (EAC) + LAME
    I found instructions for running EAC with WINE. Is that better than any >>> 'native' app?

    For my use case, `abcde` was head and shoulders better than EAC because
    I could easily script it to do exactly what I wanted.

    I have not used EAC but I avoid WINE if there's a native app.
    Which is what I'm trying to do. I haven't installed wine yet, but EAC
    might change my mind.

    With respect to rip quality, AFAIK, EAC won't bring any benefit compared
    to `libcd(io-)paranoia`.


    === Stefan

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Jan Claeys@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 19:40:01
    On Fri, 2026-06-05 at 02:14 -0400, Lee wrote:
    Sounds good. I'll start trying programs based on "paranoia"

    ? which includes pretty much every CD ripper in Debian probably, so
    there will be a lot to try! ??


    --
    Jan Claeys

    (please don't CC me when replying to the list)

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Dan Ritter@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 19:40:01
    James H. H. Lampert wrote:
    Hmm. It's been a while since the last time I mounted an audio CD on a computer (I have stereo systems and a portable DVD player for that), but as
    I recall, whenever I did, the tracks simply showed up as .aiff files.

    There was a lot being hidden from you.

    When everything goes perfectly, it can be hidden transparently
    and not too slowly.

    cdparanoia is what you want when things go wrong, which they do
    remarkably often at both the small and large scale.

    And on the rare occasions when I've actually needed to convert them for some other purpose (scoring a video, or creating a ringtone for my cellular phone), I was always able to find something to do it.

    Once you have the reconstructed data off the optical disc,
    every common tool can work with it.

    -dsr-

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Lee@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 20:00:01
    On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 2:04?AM wrote:
    On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 10:52:27PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
    Lee wrote:
    On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:38?PM Eben King wrote:

    [...]

    (& why is re-implementing something such a thing in linux??)

    Open source and no central control.

    The first part of the answer deserves a bit more: "open source" [1]
    makes that easy. You can mix and match bits and pieces of other
    programs to make that one you like and haven't found yet.

    What you're not saying is that after you do your own one-of-a-kind software Frankenstein you now own it. You. I suspect that more often than not you
    end up in the same situation as Apache OpenOffice - an unmaintained mess.
    They haven't been able to keep up with bug fixes since 2015. Over 10
    years!!!
    So yes, free software is great. ** IF ** you have the ability to maintain
    it or you can find somebody that will maintain it for you.


    And since there's not "the best", but "the best for you and
    folks alike", this is a Good Thing :-)

    But what happens when you don't have the ability to create your own best version of whatever?
    Free software doesn't look like so much of a Good Thing then..
    What happens in a work situation when the person/people that were
    maintaining some free software version of your own best version of
    something leave? "You're screwed" is what immediately comes to my mind..
    For example, I loved RANCID (https://shrubbery.net/rancid/) The people at shrubbery.net were wonderful - I'd send them a patch and they'd usually
    accept it. Meaning that when the next version of rancid was released I
    didn't have to do anything. My changes were already incorporated in rancid
    :)
    But for all the changes they didn't accept I had to figure out how to make
    my changes work in the new version. Which usually wasn't too hard, but
    there was a time or two it was a bit of a struggle.
    Then I quit. OhNoes!!! You might think it isn't all that hard to find
    someone that knows bash scripting, or perl.. but this was a group of people responsible for routing & switching. Knowing how to configure BGP doesn't
    mean you know the first thing about bash or perl. And forget about
    expect/tcl - who knows how to do that now? much less who knows that _and_ knows routing/switching? I'm guessing not many people. Certainly nobody
    in the group that I left.
    But enough.. Linux sux at backwards compatibility. I need to just accept that..
    Regards
    Lee


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Lee@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 20:10:01
    On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 1:32?PM Jan Claeys wrote:
    On Fri, 2026-06-05 at 02:14 -0400, Lee wrote:
    Sounds good. I'll start trying programs based on "paranoia"

    ? which includes pretty much every CD ripper in Debian probably, so
    there will be a lot to try! ??

    What I left unsaid was that I'll quit trying different programs when I find something good enough :)
    I'm not sure what 'good enough' is tho. Probably whatever I find that is
    more acceptable than continuing the search :)
    Regards
    Lee


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Stefan Monnier@3:633/10 to All on Friday, June 05, 2026 20:30:01
    For my use case, `abcde` was head and shoulders better than EAC because
    I could easily script it to do exactly what I wanted.
    I'm curious -- what exactly was it that you wanted?

    IIRC it was mostly generating both `.flac` and 96kb/s `.ogg` versions
    (plus a resampled version for my ASUS WL-700gE jukebox whose CPU was
    not up to the task of resampling to 48kHz on the fly).
    but also updating some related personal databases and sending some email notifications for particular issues.


    === Stefan

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Eric S Fraga@3:633/10 to All on Monday, June 08, 2026 13:00:01
    I use (and have for many years) crip. Works very well.

    --
    Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 31.0.50 2026-04-30) on Debian 13.5

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)