On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 10:19:48AM +0200, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:Well, there is always Fltk, and some people would also mention wxWindows. G'luck,
Wojciech Lipinski wrote:
As a non-IT person
who is involved in development of specialized simulation software
(solar energy engineering), I feel uncertain about investing my time
in solutions compatible with X11 or with Wayland.
Hello Wojciech,
I don't see why you should worry about that at all.
You need not develop an application that talks the X11 or Wayland
protocol directly. Nobody does that, it would be like reinventing the wheel. If you use one of the most common graphical toolkits (e.g.,
Gtk+ or Qt), it is my understanding that they support both protocols transparently.
Not Wojcieh here, but... if you could propose something which is less
of a monster than Gtk of Qt, I'd be all ears!
Nearly 20 years ago I made a couple of Gtk applications (Gtk2 back
then), one of which is still in use. Having followed Gtk's development, nowadays I'd pass, thankyouverymuch.
Today, I think I'd go with Tk or something.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 10:43:15AM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:[...]
Fltk is c++-heavy, that's something I dislike. But it seems to have aToday, I think I'd go with Tk or something.
Well, there is always Fltk, and some people would also mention wxWindows.
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 25:22:54 |
| Calls: | 117 |
| Calls today: | 117 |
| Files: | 368 |
| D/L today: |
561 files (257M bytes) |
| Messages: | 70,937 |
| Posted today: | 26 |