On 15/01/2026 9:53 am, Xeno wrote:
On 15/1/2026 9:35 am, keithr0 wrote:You just see what you want to see, obviously that didn't include the
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is-
coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
Ah, so then it'll be full of *bugs* and the owners can be the beta
testers. Right!
smiley.
On 15/01/2026 12:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:52 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 15/1/2026 1:16 pm, alvey wrote:Well it ran for 5 years not 3,
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
IIRC, he started out in life doing an electronic tech apprenticeship,
then moved into programming. Of course he claimed *his* apprenticeship
was at a high level, much higher than that of a *lowly mechanic*, such
is the ego of the man.
Automotive mechanical apprenticeship was 4 years.
and included subjects that would have
fried your brain. Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to
get degrees, and at least 2 became PhDs,
But you said they don't count for shit... because a mushbrain like you couldn't attain them presumably.
You can't have it both ways.
On 15/01/2026 12:52 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 15/1/2026 1:16 pm, alvey wrote:Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would have
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
IIRC, he started out in life doing an electronic tech apprenticeship,
then moved into programming. Of course he claimed *his* apprenticeship
was at a high level, much higher than that of a *lowly mechanic*, such
is the ego of the man.
fried your brain.
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to
get degrees,
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, like
you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice as
much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual - before
getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain has obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a small
group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees in the subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who people come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very good,
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain has
obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a small
group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees in the
subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who people come >>> to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were totally unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others were as good
as one man short.
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from someone with
no recent practical experience and getting a piece of paper at the end.
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice as
much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual -
before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure likes
to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as much
as the others, then you are lying as usual
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what
I do."
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, like
you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
On 15/01/2026 12:37 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 9:53 am, Xeno wrote:
On 15/1/2026 9:35 am, keithr0 wrote:You just see what you want to see, obviously that didn't include the
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
Ah, so then it'll be full of *bugs* and the owners can be the beta
testers. Right!
smiley.
You're totally devoid of wit and never say anything funny keith.
On 15/01/2026 12:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:52 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 15/1/2026 1:16 pm, alvey wrote:Well it ran for 5 years not 3,
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
IIRC, he started out in life doing an electronic tech apprenticeship,
then moved into programming. Of course he claimed *his*
apprenticeship was at a high level, much higher than that of a *lowly
mechanic*, such is the ego of the man.
Automotive mechanical apprenticeship was 4 years.
˙and included subjects that would have
fried your brain. Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on
to get degrees, and at least 2 became PhDs,
But you said they don't count for shit... because a mushbrain like you couldn't attain them presumably.
You can't have it both ways.
Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:52 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 15/1/2026 1:16 pm, alvey wrote:Well it ran for 5 years not 3,
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was >>>>> the actual claim?
IIRC, he started out in life doing an electronic tech apprenticeship,
then moved into programming. Of course he claimed *his* apprenticeship >>>> was at a high level, much higher than that of a *lowly mechanic*, such >>>> is the ego of the man.
Automotive mechanical apprenticeship was 4 years.
In Keith?s era, a ?standard? apprenticeship was 5 years. I know because my apprenticeship was of the same duration, 5 years, one of the last before
they cut them down to 4. Still 4, not 3 but they can be abbreviated with ?special dispensation? from the ITC. (See what I did there?)
and included subjects that would have
fried your brain. Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to
get degrees, and at least 2 became PhDs,
I lost track of all the apprentices of my year because I was in a small
town and the only apprentice there. I did block release at a distant Tech, Burnie Tech, and knew no one there from my local work environment or district.
Note how he tries to big note himself, making his apprenticeship seem more than it really was.
But you said they don't count for shit... because a mushbrain like you
couldn't attain them presumably.
You can't have it both ways.He tries to.
On 15/01/2026 5:29 pm, Xeno wrote:
Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:52 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 15/1/2026 1:16 pm, alvey wrote:Well it ran for 5 years not 3,
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>> car-is-
coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was >>>>>> the actual claim?
IIRC, he started out in life doing an electronic tech apprenticeship, >>>>> then moved into programming. Of course he claimed *his* apprenticeship >>>>> was at a high level, much higher than that of a *lowly mechanic*, such >>>>> is the ego of the man.
Automotive mechanical apprenticeship was 4 years.
In Keith?s era, a ?standard? apprenticeship was 5 years. I know
because my
apprenticeship was of the same duration, 5 years, one of the last before
they cut them down to 4. Still 4, not 3 but they can be abbreviated with
?special dispensation? from the ITC. (See what I did there?)
˙ and included subjects that would have
fried your brain. Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to >>>> get degrees, and at least 2 became PhDs,
I lost track of all the apprentices of my year because I was in a small
town and the only apprentice there. I did block release at a distant
Tech,
Burnie Tech, and knew no one there from my local work environment or
district.
Note how he tries to big note himself, making his apprenticeship seem
But you said they don't count for shit... because a mushbrain like you
couldn't attain them presumably.
more
than it really was.
More than it was, how big do you think it was then?
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very good,
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain has
obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a small
group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees in the
subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who people come >>> to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were totally unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others were as good
as one man short.
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from someone with
no recent practical experience and getting a piece of paper at the end.
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very good,
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain has
obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a small >>>> group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees in the >>>> subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who people
come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were totally
unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others were as good
as one man short.
Sooo, if this job was so "brain-frying" how could "totally unqualified" people do it?
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from someone
with no recent practical experience and getting a piece of paper at
the end.
What a coincidence! *All* the remaining DATEs chant this mantra
regularly. Can't imagine why...
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an independent
motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is-
coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
On 15/01/2026 9:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is-
coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
Don't know if you're trying to be funny or not :)
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as
per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what
I do."
Annnd through the ice goes Richo.
On 15/01/2026 4:08 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice >>>>> as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per
usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he
sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as
per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what >>> I do."
Annnd through the ice goes Richo.
Looks like keith has run away again...
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:08 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>> was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice >>>>>> as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per
usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he >>>>>> sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as
per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what >>>> I do."
Annnd through the ice goes Richo.
Looks like keith has run away again...
One can only hope that it's permanent. It's quite possible Ashley as he invariably loses his way in here.
Btw... completely OT, but I only found out a couple of days ago, the
online residential White Pages was deleted last November. Another
instance of just how much better the privatisation of utilities is than being run by the guvmint. Bah!
On 15/01/2026 4:08 pm, alvey wrote:
Looks like keith has run away again...
proving he's all spit but no balls.
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:08 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>> was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified
as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as
per usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever >>>>>> he sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as
per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at
what
I do."
Annnd through the ice goes Richo.
Looks like keith has run away again...
One can only hope that it's permanent. It's quite possible Ashley as he invariably loses his way in here.
Btw... completely OT, but I only found out a couple of days ago, the
online residential White Pages was deleted last November. Another
instance of just how much better the privatisation of utilities is than being run by the guvmint. Bah!
On 16/01/2026 10:25 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:08 pm, alvey wrote:
Looks like keith has run away again...
Like everyone else here, he's probably sick to death of your repetitive infantile bullshit.
proving he's all spit but no balls.
ROTFL :)
From the clogwog who cries like a little girl whenever the focus turns
to him.
*Jesus* you're a pathetic cunt of a thing :)
On 16/01/2026 10:25 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:08 pm, alvey wrote:
Looks like keith has run away again...
Like everyone
Noddy wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:25 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:08 pm, alvey wrote:
Looks like keith has run away again...
Like everyone else here, he's probably sick to death of your
repetitive infantile bullshit.
proving he's all spit but no balls.
ROTFL :)
˙From the clogwog who cries like a little girl whenever the focus
turns to him.
*Jesus* you're a pathetic cunt of a thing :)
Nahhh. A "pathetic cunt of a thing" would be a hypocrite who screeched
for others to prove their claims but then refused to reciprocate when
the focus turned to him, and then bolted into Castle Killfile. *That's* wayyy more pathetic Fraudster.
You're a joke Fraudster.
On 15/1/2026 3:50 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:Especially true in IT, when my son worked in London for an IT startup
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very good,
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain has
obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a small >>>> group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees in the >>>> subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who people
come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were totally
unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others were as good
as one man short.
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from someone
with no recent practical experience and getting a piece of paper at
the end.
(It was called Hailo, they invented the software to run taxi bookings similar to Uber who actually copied/stole the software ) they sometimes
went looking for IT talent in gaming platforms and offered jobs to a
few, they had to pass a test and those that did were offered jobs, some
had no qualifications apart from basic secondary school, they were late teens or early 20's, some turned out to be very good at their jobs.
On 15/1/2026 8:55 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 15/1/2026 3:50 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:Especially true in IT, when my son worked in London for an IT startup
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very good,
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice >>>>> as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per
usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he
sure likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain has >>>>> obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a small >>>>> group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees in the >>>>> subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who people >>>>> come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were totally
unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others were as
good as one man short.
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from someone
with no recent practical experience and getting a piece of paper at
the end.
(It was called Hailo, they invented the software to run taxi bookings
similar to Uber who actually copied/stole the software ) they
sometimes went looking for IT talent in gaming platforms and offered
jobs to a few, they had to pass a test and those that did were offered
jobs, some had no qualifications apart from basic secondary school,
they were late teens or early 20's, some turned out to be very good at
their jobs.
Kids who are good at gaming are likely to have skillsets transferable to programming. Transferable experience, who would have thought? These skillsets include logic, problem-solving, pattern recognition,
persistence and the breaking down of large complex tasks.
Unsurprisingly, some of those well honed skillsets are found in young
people with ASD. ASD people autistic youth often excel at gaming and
spend a lot of time playing due to shared traits like intense focus and pattern recognition, finding gaming a structured, socially comfortable
space to build skills where their experience with overcoming game
challenges and enjoying deep focus can make the learning curve smoother, especially for game development or logic-based coding.
Should anyone bother to check, the most successful of those
transitioning to programming from gaming are likely to be undiagnosed ASDs.
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what
I do."
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain has
obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a small
group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees in the
subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who people come >>> to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
Completely true for once.
You assert that the claim is true, but, if it is unproven, you are lying.
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as
per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what
I do."
Annnd through the ice goes Richo.
On 15/01/2026 4:08 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>> car-is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice >>>>> as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per
usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he
sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as
per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what >>> I do."
Annnd through the ice goes Richo.
Looks like keith has run away again... proving he's all spit but no balls.
In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."
On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
You're on thin ice flinging these accusations of lying around Richo.
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
On 15/01/2026 12:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 11:23 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, like
you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Yada tada yada same shit different day.
Fact. Endless firmware and software updates prove how useless
programmers are. Not surprising when they have mushbrains like you doing
the programming.
(there still current litigation over that),After a mechanic damaged the transmission on our old Subaru XV
Can you expand on how a mechanic allegedly damaged your transmission?
On 16/01/2026 1:24 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 15/1/2026 8:55 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 15/1/2026 3:50 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:Especially true in IT, when my son worked in London for an IT startup
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>> was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified
as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as
per usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever >>>>>> he sure likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain
has obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a
small
group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees in >>>>>> the
subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who
people come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
good, others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were
totally unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others
were as good as one man short.
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from someone
with no recent practical experience and getting a piece of paper at
the end.
(It was called Hailo, they invented the software to run taxi bookings
similar to Uber who actually copied/stole the software ) they
sometimes went looking for IT talent in gaming platforms and offered
jobs to a few, they had to pass a test and those that did were
offered jobs, some had no qualifications apart from basic secondary
school, they were late teens or early 20's, some turned out to be
very good at their jobs.
Kids who are good at gaming are likely to have skillsets transferable
to programming. Transferable experience, who would have thought? These
skillsets include logic, problem-solving, pattern recognition,
persistence and the breaking down of large complex tasks.
Unsurprisingly, some of those well honed skillsets are found in young
people with ASD. ASD people autistic youth often excel at gaming and
spend a lot of time playing due to shared traits like intense focus
and pattern recognition, finding gaming a structured, socially
comfortable space to build skills where their experience with
overcoming game challenges and enjoying deep focus can make the
learning curve smoother, especially for game development or logic-
based coding.
Should anyone bother to check, the most successful of those
transitioning to programming from gaming are likely to be undiagnosed
ASDs.
ASDs are unlikely to be successful programmers in the commercial world,
One of the characteristics of an ASD is a lack of communications skills. Large commercial pieces of software are written by teams not some lone brilliant person and interpersonal communications are very important. Working in such a team is very different to doing it all by yourself, as
I found out when I started programming professionally.
On 16/01/2026 9:20 am, Noddy wrote:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On 16/01/2026 10:25 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:08 pm, alvey wrote:
Looks like keith has run away again...
Like everyone
Nope.
keithr0 wrote:
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would have
fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Looks like keith has run away again...
Like everyone
Nope.
*YOU* sure as fuck do!. I see you are post snipping again, what the fuck
do you expect to gain from that??.
you stupids are regressing at a rate of knots.. :):):)
On 15/01/2026 4:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as
per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what
I do."
Quote (your version):
"Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice as
much as *OTHERS* because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual"
When what I said was
"I still get paid more than *TWICE THE AVERAGE WAGE* 'coz I'm good at
what I do."
Usual clocky distortion.
On 15/01/2026 4:09 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 11:23 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Yada tada yada same shit different day.
Fact. Endless firmware and software updates prove how useless
programmers are. Not surprising when they have mushbrains like you
doing the programming.
On 3/01/2026 9:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
On 15/01/2026 6:04 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
You're on thin ice flinging these accusations of lying around Richo.
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would have
fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
On 15/01/2026 6:08 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:You wish.
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- is- >>>>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice >>>>> as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per
usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he
sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as
per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what >>> I do."
Annnd through the ice goes Richo.
On 15/01/2026 6:04 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
You're on thin ice flinging these accusations of lying around Richo.
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that was
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
relevant to the task.
That's curious.
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example when asked.
On 16/01/2026 1:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:09 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 11:23 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Yada tada yada same shit different day.
Fact. Endless firmware and software updates prove how useless
programmers are. Not surprising when they have mushbrains like you
doing the programming.
On 3/01/2026 9:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
<snip stuff that I have no answer for>
Just one example of endless cases of "Software engineer" and
"programmer" gross incompetence;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WiQAOmESH0
No wonder when even illogical mushbrains like you get a title of "programmer" or "software engineer" assuming you weren't lying about
that too.
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:04 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice >>>>> as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per
usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he
sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
You're on thin ice flinging these accusations of lying around Richo.
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is invariably based solely on your opinion.
On 16/01/2026 12:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice >>>>> as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per
usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he
sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as
per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what >>> I do."
Quote (your version):
"Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as *OTHERS* because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual"
When what I said was
"I still get paid more than *TWICE THE AVERAGE WAGE* 'coz I'm good at
what I do."
Usual clocky distortion.
Your usual keith mushbrained and pathetic weaseling in vain you mean. I
was paraphrasing from memory not that it makes one iota of difference to what you claimed. You clearly stated that "I still get paid more than
twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what I do.".
Your words.
"Others" includes your co-workers when talking about the average wage
and you clearly claimed you were getting paid *more* than double.
Period. End of story. Just as I said. No distortion.
You're an egotistical bullshit artist keith and you got your arse handed
to you *again*. It's no wonder you spend so much time enabling a
compulsive liar, you're a cut from the same cloth.
On 16/1/2026 3:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 1:24 pm, Xeno wrote:Omigod you talk some shit. Some *facts* for you.
On 15/1/2026 8:55 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 15/1/2026 3:50 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:Especially true in IT, when my son worked in London for an IT
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified
fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>>> was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified >>>>>>> as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as >>>>>>> per usual - before getting smacked down. For such an
underachiever he sure likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain >>>>>>> has obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a >>>>>>> small
group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees >>>>>>> in the
subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who
people come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
good, others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were
totally unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others
were as good as one man short.
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from someone
with no recent practical experience and getting a piece of paper at >>>>> the end.
startup (It was called Hailo, they invented the software to run taxi
bookings similar to Uber who actually copied/stole the software )
they sometimes went looking for IT talent in gaming platforms and
offered jobs to a few, they had to pass a test and those that did
were offered jobs, some had no qualifications apart from basic
secondary school, they were late teens or early 20's, some turned
out to be very good at their jobs.
Kids who are good at gaming are likely to have skillsets transferable
to programming. Transferable experience, who would have thought?
These skillsets include logic, problem-solving, pattern recognition,
persistence and the breaking down of large complex tasks.
Unsurprisingly, some of those well honed skillsets are found in young
people with ASD. ASD people autistic youth often excel at gaming and
spend a lot of time playing due to shared traits like intense focus
and pattern recognition, finding gaming a structured, socially
comfortable space to build skills where their experience with
overcoming game challenges and enjoying deep focus can make the
learning curve smoother, especially for game development or logic-
based coding.
Should anyone bother to check, the most successful of those
transitioning to programming from gaming are likely to be undiagnosed
ASDs.
ASDs are unlikely to be successful programmers in the commercial
world, One of the characteristics of an ASD is a lack of
communications skills. Large commercial pieces of software are written
by teams not some lone brilliant person and interpersonal
communications are very important. Working in such a team is very
different to doing it all by yourself, as I found out when I started
programming professionally.
Baron-Cohen further reports an elevated prevalence of autistic
individuals in STEM-related careers (Baron-Cohen, 2000). Finally, one
study investigates the prevalence of individuals with ASD in computer science majors (White et al., 2011). The authors find that there is a relation between computer science majors and higher scores on the autism spectrum quotient measurement instrument AQ (Baron-Cohen et al., 2006).
They found that over 50 percent of the university students who scored
high on the AQ were pursuing computer science.
You probably worked with many who were on the spectrum but you wouldn't
have known.
On 16/01/2026 3:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 3:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:None of the people that I worked with were anywhere near the spectrum,
On 16/01/2026 1:24 pm, Xeno wrote:Omigod you talk some shit. Some *facts* for you.
On 15/1/2026 8:55 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 15/1/2026 3:50 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:Especially true in IT, when my son worked in London for an IT
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid >>>>>>>> twice as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified >>>>>>>> as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as >>>>>>>> per usual - before getting smacked down. For such an
underachiever he sure likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain >>>>>>>> has obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a >>>>>>>> small
group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees >>>>>>>> in the
subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who
people come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
good, others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were >>>>>> totally unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others >>>>>> were as good as one man short.
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from someone >>>>>> with no recent practical experience and getting a piece of paper
at the end.
startup (It was called Hailo, they invented the software to run
taxi bookings similar to Uber who actually copied/stole the
software ) they sometimes went looking for IT talent in gaming
platforms and offered jobs to a few, they had to pass a test and
those that did were offered jobs, some had no qualifications apart
from basic secondary school, they were late teens or early 20's,
some turned out to be very good at their jobs.
Kids who are good at gaming are likely to have skillsets
transferable to programming. Transferable experience, who would have
thought? These skillsets include logic, problem-solving, pattern
recognition, persistence and the breaking down of large complex
tasks. Unsurprisingly, some of those well honed skillsets are found
in young people with ASD. ASD people autistic youth often excel at
gaming and spend a lot of time playing due to shared traits like
intense focus and pattern recognition, finding gaming a structured,
socially comfortable space to build skills where their experience
with overcoming game challenges and enjoying deep focus can make the
learning curve smoother, especially for game development or logic-
based coding.
Should anyone bother to check, the most successful of those
transitioning to programming from gaming are likely to be
undiagnosed ASDs.
ASDs are unlikely to be successful programmers in the commercial
world, One of the characteristics of an ASD is a lack of
communications skills. Large commercial pieces of software are
written by teams not some lone brilliant person and interpersonal
communications are very important. Working in such a team is very
different to doing it all by yourself, as I found out when I started
programming professionally.
Baron-Cohen further reports an elevated prevalence of autistic
individuals in STEM-related careers (Baron-Cohen, 2000). Finally, one
study investigates the prevalence of individuals with ASD in computer
science majors (White et al., 2011). The authors find that there is a
relation between computer science majors and higher scores on the
autism spectrum quotient measurement instrument AQ (Baron-Cohen et
al., 2006). They found that over 50 percent of the university students
who scored high on the AQ were pursuing computer science.
You probably worked with many who were on the spectrum but you
wouldn't have known.
if for no other reason that HR would have weeded them out.
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would have
fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
On 16/01/2026 2:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would have
fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
He's only got one shovel.
On 16/1/2026 9:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 3:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 3:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:None of the people that I worked with were anywhere near the spectrum,
On 16/01/2026 1:24 pm, Xeno wrote:Omigod you talk some shit. Some *facts* for you.
On 15/1/2026 8:55 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 15/1/2026 3:50 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:Especially true in IT, when my son worked in London for an IT
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very >>>>>>> good, others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were >>>>>>> totally unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others >>>>>>> were as good as one man short.
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid >>>>>>>>> twice as much as others because he was so good yet not
qualified as he denigrated people with real qualifications in >>>>>>>>> the group as per usual - before getting smacked down. For such >>>>>>>>> an underachiever he sure likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain >>>>>>>>> has obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in >>>>>>>>> a small
group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees >>>>>>>>> in the
subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who >>>>>>>>> people come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from
someone with no recent practical experience and getting a piece >>>>>>> of paper at the end.
startup (It was called Hailo, they invented the software to run
taxi bookings similar to Uber who actually copied/stole the
software ) they sometimes went looking for IT talent in gaming
platforms and offered jobs to a few, they had to pass a test and
those that did were offered jobs, some had no qualifications apart >>>>>> from basic secondary school, they were late teens or early 20's,
some turned out to be very good at their jobs.
Kids who are good at gaming are likely to have skillsets
transferable to programming. Transferable experience, who would
have thought? These skillsets include logic, problem-solving,
pattern recognition, persistence and the breaking down of large
complex tasks. Unsurprisingly, some of those well honed skillsets
are found in young people with ASD. ASD people autistic youth often >>>>> excel at gaming and spend a lot of time playing due to shared
traits like intense focus and pattern recognition, finding gaming a >>>>> structured, socially comfortable space to build skills where their
experience with overcoming game challenges and enjoying deep focus
can make the learning curve smoother, especially for game
development or logic- based coding.
Should anyone bother to check, the most successful of those
transitioning to programming from gaming are likely to be
undiagnosed ASDs.
ASDs are unlikely to be successful programmers in the commercial
world, One of the characteristics of an ASD is a lack of
communications skills. Large commercial pieces of software are
written by teams not some lone brilliant person and interpersonal
communications are very important. Working in such a team is very
different to doing it all by yourself, as I found out when I started
programming professionally.
Baron-Cohen further reports an elevated prevalence of autistic
individuals in STEM-related careers (Baron-Cohen, 2000). Finally, one
study investigates the prevalence of individuals with ASD in computer
science majors (White et al., 2011). The authors find that there is a
relation between computer science majors and higher scores on the
autism spectrum quotient measurement instrument AQ (Baron-Cohen et
al., 2006). They found that over 50 percent of the university
students who scored high on the AQ were pursuing computer science.
You probably worked with many who were on the spectrum but you
wouldn't have known.
if for no other reason that HR would have weeded them out.
Bullshit. A lot of people on the spectrum have never had an official diagnosis. How would HR know? How would HR *legally* weed them out?
Then, FWIW, People on the spectrum are being actively sought out for
roles in IT. One of my friends, now close to retirement, has been
obviously on the spectrum since his days at Uni - full on geek. He has
been a good friend since 1982 when we met at a geek meeting. He has
never had trouble finding IT work in spite of him obviously being on the spectrum yet to this day undiagnosed. In fact, most at the geek meeting
were clearly on the spectrum.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that was
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- is- >>>>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
relevant to the task.
That's curious.
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car-is- >>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What was
the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example when asked.
On 16/01/2026 6:04 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 2:18 pm, alvey wrote:True and there is a whole lot of shit from your cult to did through.
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would
have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
He's only got one shovel.
On 16/01/2026 8:22 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 9:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:Bet he's never worked for a large corporation (that is if he exists at all)
On 16/01/2026 3:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 3:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:None of the people that I worked with were anywhere near the
On 16/01/2026 1:24 pm, Xeno wrote:Omigod you talk some shit. Some *facts* for you.
On 15/1/2026 8:55 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 15/1/2026 3:50 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:Especially true in IT, when my son worked in London for an IT
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very >>>>>>>> good, others despite their qualificatios were useless, there
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid >>>>>>>>>> twice as much as others because he was so good yet not
qualified as he denigrated people with real qualifications in >>>>>>>>>> the group as per usual - before getting smacked down. For such >>>>>>>>>> an underachiever he sure likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his >>>>>>>>>> brain has obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in >>>>>>>>>> a small
group of software developers all of whom except me have
degrees in the
subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who >>>>>>>>>> people come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
were totally unqualified people who did an excellent job, while >>>>>>>> others were as good as one man short.
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from
someone with no recent practical experience and getting a piece >>>>>>>> of paper at the end.
startup (It was called Hailo, they invented the software to run >>>>>>> taxi bookings similar to Uber who actually copied/stole the
software ) they sometimes went looking for IT talent in gaming
platforms and offered jobs to a few, they had to pass a test and >>>>>>> those that did were offered jobs, some had no qualifications
apart from basic secondary school, they were late teens or early >>>>>>> 20's, some turned out to be very good at their jobs.
Kids who are good at gaming are likely to have skillsets
transferable to programming. Transferable experience, who would
have thought? These skillsets include logic, problem-solving,
pattern recognition, persistence and the breaking down of large
complex tasks. Unsurprisingly, some of those well honed skillsets >>>>>> are found in young people with ASD. ASD people autistic youth
often excel at gaming and spend a lot of time playing due to
shared traits like intense focus and pattern recognition, finding >>>>>> gaming a structured, socially comfortable space to build skills
where their experience with overcoming game challenges and
enjoying deep focus can make the learning curve smoother,
especially for game development or logic- based coding.
Should anyone bother to check, the most successful of those
transitioning to programming from gaming are likely to be
undiagnosed ASDs.
ASDs are unlikely to be successful programmers in the commercial
world, One of the characteristics of an ASD is a lack of
communications skills. Large commercial pieces of software are
written by teams not some lone brilliant person and interpersonal
communications are very important. Working in such a team is very
different to doing it all by yourself, as I found out when I
started programming professionally.
Baron-Cohen further reports an elevated prevalence of autistic
individuals in STEM-related careers (Baron-Cohen, 2000). Finally,
one study investigates the prevalence of individuals with ASD in
computer science majors (White et al., 2011). The authors find that
there is a relation between computer science majors and higher
scores on the autism spectrum quotient measurement instrument AQ
(Baron-Cohen et al., 2006). They found that over 50 percent of the
university students who scored high on the AQ were pursuing computer
science.
You probably worked with many who were on the spectrum but you
wouldn't have known.
spectrum, if for no other reason that HR would have weeded them out.
Bullshit. A lot of people on the spectrum have never had an official
diagnosis. How would HR know? How would HR *legally* weed them out?
Then, FWIW, People on the spectrum are being actively sought out for
roles in IT. One of my friends, now close to retirement, has been
obviously on the spectrum since his days at Uni - full on geek. He has
been a good friend since 1982 when we met at a geek meeting. He has
never had trouble finding IT work in spite of him obviously being on
the spectrum yet to this day undiagnosed. In fact, most at the geek
meeting were clearly on the spectrum.
keithr0 wrote:Pick any imaginary company, he will anyway.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that was
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>> was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
relevant to the task.
That's curious.
And which company was this?
On 16/01/2026 5:50 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 12:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>> was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified
as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as
per usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever >>>>>> he sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as
per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at
what
I do."
Quote (your version):
"Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as *OTHERS* because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual"
When what I said was
"I still get paid more than *TWICE THE AVERAGE WAGE* 'coz I'm good at
what I do."
Usual clocky distortion.
Your usual keith mushbrained and pathetic weaseling in vain you mean.
I was paraphrasing from memory not that it makes one iota of
difference to what you claimed. You clearly stated that "I still get
paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what I do.".
Your words.
"Others" includes your co-workers when talking about the average wage
and you clearly claimed you were getting paid *more* than double.
Period. End of story. Just as I said. No distortion.
You're an egotistical bullshit artist keith and you got your arse
handed to you *again*. It's no wonder you spend so much time enabling
a compulsive liar, you're a cut from the same cloth.
I'm not sure what reality you're living in
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that was
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>> was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
relevant to the task.
That's curious.
And which company was this?
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example
when asked.
On 16/01/2026 5:58 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 1:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:09 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 11:23 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Yada tada yada same shit different day.
Fact. Endless firmware and software updates prove how useless
programmers are. Not surprising when they have mushbrains like you
doing the programming.
On 3/01/2026 9:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
<snip stuff that I have no answer for>
A great impression of Usain Bolt.
Just one example of endless cases of "Software engineer" and
"programmer" gross incompetence;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WiQAOmESH0
So a niche car manufacturer hired a (probably cheap) bunch of
incompetent programmers
No wonder when even illogical mushbrains like you get a title of
"programmer" or "software engineer" assuming you weren't lying about
that too.
You're the liar boy.
On 16/01/2026 8:22 pm, Xeno wrote:
Bullshit. A lot of people on the spectrum have never had an officialBet he's never worked for a large corporation (that is if he exists at all)
diagnosis. How would HR know? How would HR *legally* weed them out?
Then, FWIW, People on the spectrum are being actively sought out for
roles in IT. One of my friends, now close to retirement, has been
obviously on the spectrum since his days at Uni - full on geek. He has
been a good friend since 1982 when we met at a geek meeting. He has
never had trouble finding IT work in spite of him obviously being on
the spectrum yet to this day undiagnosed. In fact, most at the geek
meeting were clearly on the spectrum.
On 16/01/2026 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified
fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>>> was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
was relevant to the task.
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Makebelieve Inc.
On 16/01/2026 3:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 3:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:None of the people that I worked with were anywhere near the spectrum,
On 16/01/2026 1:24 pm, Xeno wrote:Omigod you talk some shit. Some *facts* for you.
On 15/1/2026 8:55 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 15/1/2026 3:50 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:Especially true in IT, when my son worked in London for an IT
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid >>>>>>>> twice as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified >>>>>>>> as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as >>>>>>>> per usual - before getting smacked down. For such an
underachiever he sure likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain >>>>>>>> has obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a >>>>>>>> small
group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees >>>>>>>> in the
subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who
people come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
good, others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were >>>>>> totally unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others >>>>>> were as good as one man short.
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from someone >>>>>> with no recent practical experience and getting a piece of paper
at the end.
startup (It was called Hailo, they invented the software to run
taxi bookings similar to Uber who actually copied/stole the
software ) they sometimes went looking for IT talent in gaming
platforms and offered jobs to a few, they had to pass a test and
those that did were offered jobs, some had no qualifications apart
from basic secondary school, they were late teens or early 20's,
some turned out to be very good at their jobs.
Kids who are good at gaming are likely to have skillsets
transferable to programming. Transferable experience, who would have
thought? These skillsets include logic, problem-solving, pattern
recognition, persistence and the breaking down of large complex
tasks. Unsurprisingly, some of those well honed skillsets are found
in young people with ASD. ASD people autistic youth often excel at
gaming and spend a lot of time playing due to shared traits like
intense focus and pattern recognition, finding gaming a structured,
socially comfortable space to build skills where their experience
with overcoming game challenges and enjoying deep focus can make the
learning curve smoother, especially for game development or logic-
based coding.
Should anyone bother to check, the most successful of those
transitioning to programming from gaming are likely to be
undiagnosed ASDs.
ASDs are unlikely to be successful programmers in the commercial
world, One of the characteristics of an ASD is a lack of
communications skills. Large commercial pieces of software are
written by teams not some lone brilliant person and interpersonal
communications are very important. Working in such a team is very
different to doing it all by yourself, as I found out when I started
programming professionally.
Baron-Cohen further reports an elevated prevalence of autistic
individuals in STEM-related careers (Baron-Cohen, 2000). Finally, one
study investigates the prevalence of individuals with ASD in computer
science majors (White et al., 2011). The authors find that there is a
relation between computer science majors and higher scores on the
autism spectrum quotient measurement instrument AQ (Baron-Cohen et
al., 2006). They found that over 50 percent of the university students
who scored high on the AQ were pursuing computer science.
You probably worked with many who were on the spectrum but you
wouldn't have known.
if for no other reason that HR would have weeded them out.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an exampleWhen did you ask?
when asked.
On 16/01/2026 4:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
The phantom snipper strikes again.
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would have
fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
Oh, did I upset you by not answering princess?
OK I'll have to make amends, or you'll go to bed tonight all upset.
Mathmatics - starting with simple stuff like logarithms both base 10 an
base e*, moving on to complex numbers and the use of polar, and
Cartesian coordinates. Then on to calculus starting with simple differentiation, and integration, moving on to solving simultaneous differential equations, Laplace transforms, and Fourier analysis.
Mathematical basis of active and passive electronic and electrical components, transmission line theory, impedance matching, microwaves, antennae etc etc.
The whole thing was to teach how to design stuff not just fix it.
* In math, e (Euler's number) is a fundamental irrational** constant, approximately 2.71828, that serves as the base for natural logarithms
and exponential functions, representing continuous growth, like compound interest or population growth, and appears in calculus, finance, and
natural sciences
** Irrational number - one with an infinite number of decimal places.
Can you sleep tonight without worry tonight now?
On 16/01/2026 9:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 8:22 pm, Xeno wrote:
Bullshit. A lot of people on the spectrum have never had an officialBet he's never worked for a large corporation (that is if he exists at
diagnosis. How would HR know? How would HR *legally* weed them out?
Then, FWIW, People on the spectrum are being actively sought out for
roles in IT. One of my friends, now close to retirement, has been
obviously on the spectrum since his days at Uni - full on geek. He
has been a good friend since 1982 when we met at a geek meeting. He
has never had trouble finding IT work in spite of him obviously being
on the spectrum yet to this day undiagnosed. In fact, most at the
geek meeting were clearly on the spectrum.
all)
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh? No matter *what* the
subject matter, he remarkably has a "friend" who is involved at expert
level and has passed knowledge onto the mental case to make *him* an
expert despite having no direct hands on experience.
Maybe that's where his "transferred experience" theory comes from :)
On 16/01/2026 8:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an exampleWhen did you ask?
when asked.
Not that I've been following this juvenile back and forth bullshit
the absolute fucking *height* of hypocrisy for him to have done so given
all the noise he made about not having to respond to your request that
he give some examples of his ability to program in Arduino.
These dickheads give new meaning to "retarded".
On 16/01/2026 5:50 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 12:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>> was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified
as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as
per usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever >>>>>> he sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as
much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, as
per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at
what
I do."
Quote (your version):
"Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as *OTHERS* because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual"
When what I said was
"I still get paid more than *TWICE THE AVERAGE WAGE* 'coz I'm good at
what I do."
Usual clocky distortion.
Your usual keith mushbrained and pathetic weaseling in vain you mean.
I was paraphrasing from memory not that it makes one iota of
difference to what you claimed. You clearly stated that "I still get
paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what I do.".
Your words.
"Others" includes your co-workers when talking about the average wage
and you clearly claimed you were getting paid *more* than double.
Period. End of story. Just as I said. No distortion.
You're an egotistical bullshit artist keith and you got your arse
handed to you *again*. It's no wonder you spend so much time enabling
a compulsive liar, you're a cut from the same cloth.
I'm not sure what reality you're living in but it sure ain't the one
that the rest of us are.
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is
invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
On 16/01/2026 8:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an exampleWhen did you ask?
when asked.
Not that I've been following this juvenile back and forth bullshit...
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:50 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 12:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified
fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>>> was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified >>>>>>> as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as >>>>>>> per usual - before getting smacked down. For such an
underachiever he sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as >>>>>> much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar,
as per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at >>>>> what
I do."
Quote (your version):
"Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as *OTHERS* because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual"
When what I said was
"I still get paid more than *TWICE THE AVERAGE WAGE* 'coz I'm good
at what I do."
Usual clocky distortion.
Your usual keith mushbrained and pathetic weaseling in vain you mean.
I was paraphrasing from memory not that it makes one iota of
difference to what you claimed. You clearly stated that "I still get
paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what I do.".
Your words.
"Others" includes your co-workers when talking about the average wage
and you clearly claimed you were getting paid *more* than double.
Period. End of story. Just as I said. No distortion.
You're an egotistical bullshit artist keith and you got your arse
handed to you *again*. It's no wonder you spend so much time enabling
a compulsive liar, you're a cut from the same cloth.
I'm not sure what reality you're living in but it sure ain't the one
that the rest of us are.
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are you
sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is
invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't be able
to get up...
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example
when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some GPS thing or something claiming that you were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
On 16/1/2026 9:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:04 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 2:18 pm, alvey wrote:True and there is a whole lot of shit from your cult to did through.
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would
have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
He's only got one shovel.
No cult here. You're worshiping at the altar of the cult of Darren. Too
bad Darren has turned out to be a *false prophet*.
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 4:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
The phantom snipper strikes again.
And why did you do that Richo? Something to hide?
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would
have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
Oh, did I upset you by not answering princess?
OK I'll have to make amends, or you'll go to bed tonight all upset.
Mathmatics - starting with simple stuff like logarithms both base 10
an base e*, moving on to complex numbers and the use of polar, and
Cartesian coordinates. Then on to calculus starting with simple
differentiation, and integration, moving on to solving simultaneous
differential equations, Laplace transforms, and Fourier analysis.
Mathematical basis of active and passive electronic and electrical
components, transmission line theory, impedance matching, microwaves,
antennae etc etc.
The whole thing was to teach how to design stuff not just fix it.
* In math, e (Euler's number) is a fundamental irrational** constant,
approximately 2.71828, that serves as the base for natural logarithms
and exponential functions, representing continuous growth, like
compound interest or population growth, and appears in calculus,
finance, and
natural sciences
** Irrational number - one with an infinite number of decimal places.
Can you sleep tonight without worry tonight now?
There's a coincidence. The style of this Richo response is *exactly* the same style that Fraudster adopted when his lies were first challenged. A mixture of sneering sarcasm, Real Man sexism, selective snipping and
furious use of the bicycle pump that's deep in his arse.
On 16/01/2026 6:03 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:58 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 1:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:09 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 11:23 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Yada tada yada same shit different day.
Fact. Endless firmware and software updates prove how useless
programmers are. Not surprising when they have mushbrains like you
doing the programming.
On 3/01/2026 9:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
<snip stuff that I have no answer for>
A great impression of Usain Bolt.
Just one example of endless cases of "Software engineer" and
"programmer" gross incompetence;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WiQAOmESH0
So a niche car manufacturer hired a (probably cheap) bunch of
incompetent programmers
Assumption and there is no evidence that you were competent.
No wonder when even illogical mushbrains like you get a title of
"programmer" or "software engineer" assuming you weren't lying about
that too.
You're the liar boy.
That's your worthless opinion, I brought the evidence proving *you* are
a liar.
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example
when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some GPS thing or something claiming that you were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
On 16/1/2026 11:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 16/01/2026 8:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Bullshit you haven't Darren! You have been following very closely!
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an exampleWhen did you ask?
when asked.
Not that I've been following this juvenile back and forth bullshit
˙enough to know whether he asked or not, but if he did then it would be
the absolute fucking *height* of hypocrisy for him to have done so
given all the noise he made about not having to respond to your
request that he give some examples of his ability to program in Arduino.
These dickheads give new meaning to "retarded".
You did that decades back, when you were 8 and dubbed Noddy by your dad!
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example
when asked.
That's not a serious test. The dumbest fraud could cut'n'paste endless
code from any of a squillion sites.
On 16/1/2026 11:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:Oh yeah! I suspect Darren also worked there!
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
was relevant to the task.
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Makebelieve Inc.
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that was
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>> was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
relevant to the task.
That's curious.
And which company was this?
On 16/1/2026 10:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Pick any imaginary company, he will anyway.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified
fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>>> was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
was relevant to the task.
That's curious.
And which company was this?
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is
invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't be able
to get up...
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always come up
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is
invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't be
able to get up...
short on. It's either never provided or is totally irrelevant to the
claims made. I give you a photo of white cable ties as *evidence* of possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren is 100% irrelevant to the
motor trade and always has been.
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:50 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 12:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified
fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>>> was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified >>>>>>> as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as >>>>>>> per usual - before getting smacked down. For such an
underachiever he sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice as >>>>>> much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar,
as per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at >>>>> what
I do."
Quote (your version):
"Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as *OTHERS* because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual"
When what I said was
"I still get paid more than *TWICE THE AVERAGE WAGE* 'coz I'm good
at what I do."
Usual clocky distortion.
Your usual keith mushbrained and pathetic weaseling in vain you mean.
I was paraphrasing from memory not that it makes one iota of
difference to what you claimed. You clearly stated that "I still get
paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what I do.".
Your words.
"Others" includes your co-workers when talking about the average wage
and you clearly claimed you were getting paid *more* than double.
Period. End of story. Just as I said. No distortion.
You're an egotistical bullshit artist keith and you got your arse
handed to you *again*. It's no wonder you spend so much time enabling
a compulsive liar, you're a cut from the same cloth.
I'm not sure what reality you're living in but it sure ain't the one
that the rest of us are.
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are you
sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
On 17/1/2026 8:45 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Hey, maybe one of them is a sock puppet???
On 16/01/2026 5:50 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 12:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid >>>>>>>> twice as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified >>>>>>>> as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as >>>>>>>> per usual - before getting smacked down. For such an
underachiever he sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice >>>>>>> as much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, >>>>>> as per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good
at what
I do."
Quote (your version):
"Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as *OTHERS* because he was so good yet not qualified
as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as
per usual"
When what I said was
"I still get paid more than *TWICE THE AVERAGE WAGE* 'coz I'm good
at what I do."
Usual clocky distortion.
Your usual keith mushbrained and pathetic weaseling in vain you
mean. I was paraphrasing from memory not that it makes one iota of
difference to what you claimed. You clearly stated that "I still get
paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what I do.".
Your words.
"Others" includes your co-workers when talking about the average
wage and you clearly claimed you were getting paid *more* than
double. Period. End of story. Just as I said. No distortion.
You're an egotistical bullshit artist keith and you got your arse
handed to you *again*. It's no wonder you spend so much time
enabling a compulsive liar, you're a cut from the same cloth.
I'm not sure what reality you're living in but it sure ain't the one
that the rest of us are.
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are you
sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
On 16/01/2026 6:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 3:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 3:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:None of the people that I worked with were anywhere near the spectrum,
On 16/01/2026 1:24 pm, Xeno wrote:Omigod you talk some shit. Some *facts* for you.
On 15/1/2026 8:55 pm, Daryl wrote:
On 15/1/2026 3:50 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:Especially true in IT, when my son worked in London for an IT
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very >>>>>>> good, others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were >>>>>>> totally unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others >>>>>>> were as good as one man short.
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid >>>>>>>>> twice as much as others because he was so good yet not
qualified as he denigrated people with real qualifications in >>>>>>>>> the group as per usual - before getting smacked down. For such >>>>>>>>> an underachiever he sure likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain >>>>>>>>> has obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in >>>>>>>>> a small
group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees >>>>>>>>> in the
subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who >>>>>>>>> people come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from
someone with no recent practical experience and getting a piece >>>>>>> of paper at the end.
startup (It was called Hailo, they invented the software to run
taxi bookings similar to Uber who actually copied/stole the
software ) they sometimes went looking for IT talent in gaming
platforms and offered jobs to a few, they had to pass a test and
those that did were offered jobs, some had no qualifications apart >>>>>> from basic secondary school, they were late teens or early 20's,
some turned out to be very good at their jobs.
Kids who are good at gaming are likely to have skillsets
transferable to programming. Transferable experience, who would
have thought? These skillsets include logic, problem-solving,
pattern recognition, persistence and the breaking down of large
complex tasks. Unsurprisingly, some of those well honed skillsets
are found in young people with ASD. ASD people autistic youth often >>>>> excel at gaming and spend a lot of time playing due to shared
traits like intense focus and pattern recognition, finding gaming a >>>>> structured, socially comfortable space to build skills where their
experience with overcoming game challenges and enjoying deep focus
can make the learning curve smoother, especially for game
development or logic- based coding.
Should anyone bother to check, the most successful of those
transitioning to programming from gaming are likely to be
undiagnosed ASDs.
ASDs are unlikely to be successful programmers in the commercial
world, One of the characteristics of an ASD is a lack of
communications skills. Large commercial pieces of software are
written by teams not some lone brilliant person and interpersonal
communications are very important. Working in such a team is very
different to doing it all by yourself, as I found out when I started
programming professionally.
Baron-Cohen further reports an elevated prevalence of autistic
individuals in STEM-related careers (Baron-Cohen, 2000). Finally, one
study investigates the prevalence of individuals with ASD in computer
science majors (White et al., 2011). The authors find that there is a
relation between computer science majors and higher scores on the
autism spectrum quotient measurement instrument AQ (Baron-Cohen et
al., 2006). They found that over 50 percent of the university
students who scored high on the AQ were pursuing computer science.
You probably worked with many who were on the spectrum but you
wouldn't have known.
if for no other reason that HR would have weeded them out.
There is no way you were ever a competent programmer. You're an idiot.
On 16/1/2026 9:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:04 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 2:18 pm, alvey wrote:True and there is a whole lot of shit from your cult to did through.
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would
have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
He's only got one shovel.
No cult here. You're worshiping at the altar of the cult of Darren. Too
bad Darren has turned out to be a *false prophet*.
On 16/01/2026 7:36 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 9:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:04 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 2:18 pm, alvey wrote:True and there is a whole lot of shit from your cult to did through.
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would >>>>>>> have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees, >>>>>>Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
He's only got one shovel.
No cult here. You're worshiping at the altar of the cult of Darren.
Too bad Darren has turned out to be a *false prophet*.
Yep, "JD" Richo has gone all in and sacrificed any integrity he might
have had in the process.
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 4:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
The phantom snipper strikes again.
And why did you do that Richo? Something to hide?
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would
have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
Oh, did I upset you by not answering princess?
OK I'll have to make amends, or you'll go to bed tonight all upset.
Mathmatics - starting with simple stuff like logarithms both base 10
an base e*, moving on to complex numbers and the use of polar, and
Cartesian coordinates. Then on to calculus starting with simple
differentiation, and integration, moving on to solving simultaneous
differential equations, Laplace transforms, and Fourier analysis.
Mathematical basis of active and passive electronic and electrical
components, transmission line theory, impedance matching, microwaves,
antennae etc etc.
The whole thing was to teach how to design stuff not just fix it.
* In math, e (Euler's number) is a fundamental irrational** constant,
approximately 2.71828, that serves as the base for natural logarithms
and exponential functions, representing continuous growth, like
compound interest or population growth, and appears in calculus,
finance, and
natural sciences
** Irrational number - one with an infinite number of decimal places.
Can you sleep tonight without worry tonight now?
There's a coincidence. The style of this Richo response is *exactly* the same style that Fraudster adopted when his lies were first challenged. A mixture of sneering sarcasm, Real Man sexism, selective snipping and
furious use of the bicycle pump that's deep in his arse.
On 16/01/2026 8:24 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 4:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
The phantom snipper strikes again.
And why did you do that Richo? Something to hide?
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would
have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
Oh, did I upset you by not answering princess?
OK I'll have to make amends, or you'll go to bed tonight all upset.
Mathmatics - starting with simple stuff like logarithms both base 10
an base e*, moving on to complex numbers and the use of polar, and
Cartesian coordinates. Then on to calculus starting with simple
differentiation, and integration, moving on to solving simultaneous
differential equations, Laplace transforms, and Fourier analysis.
Mathematical basis of active and passive electronic and electrical
components, transmission line theory, impedance matching, microwaves,
antennae etc etc.
The whole thing was to teach how to design stuff not just fix it.
* In math, e (Euler's number) is a fundamental irrational** constant,
approximately 2.71828, that serves as the base for natural logarithms
and exponential functions, representing continuous growth, like
compound interest or population growth, and appears in calculus,
finance, and
natural sciences
** Irrational number - one with an infinite number of decimal places.
Can you sleep tonight without worry tonight now?
There's a coincidence. The style of this Richo response is *exactly*
the same style that Fraudster adopted when his lies were first
challenged. A mixture of sneering sarcasm, Real Man sexism, selective
snipping and furious use of the bicycle pump that's deep in his arse.
lol, and so true.
On 16/01/2026 9:39 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 10:15 pm, alvey wrote:See my reply to alvo and apologise. I know that you won't because you
keithr0 wrote:Pick any imaginary company, he will anyway.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
was relevant to the task.
That's curious.
And which company was this?
and your fellow cultist never admit that you were wrong.
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always come up
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is
invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't be
able to get up...
short on. It's either never provided or is totally irrelevant to the
claims made. I give you a photo of white cable ties as *evidence* of
possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren is 100% irrelevant to the
motor trade and always has been.
On 16/01/2026 10:24 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So you have no answer then.
On 16/01/2026 4:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
The phantom snipper strikes again.
And why did you do that Richo? Something to hide?
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would
have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
Oh, did I upset you by not answering princess?
OK I'll have to make amends, or you'll go to bed tonight all upset.
Mathmatics - starting with simple stuff like logarithms both base 10
an base e*, moving on to complex numbers and the use of polar, and
Cartesian coordinates. Then on to calculus starting with simple
differentiation, and integration, moving on to solving simultaneous
differential equations, Laplace transforms, and Fourier analysis.
Mathematical basis of active and passive electronic and electrical
components, transmission line theory, impedance matching, microwaves,
antennae etc etc.
The whole thing was to teach how to design stuff not just fix it.
* In math, e (Euler's number) is a fundamental irrational** constant,
approximately 2.71828, that serves as the base for natural logarithms
and exponential functions, representing continuous growth, like
compound interest or population growth, and appears in calculus,
finance, and
natural sciences
** Irrational number - one with an infinite number of decimal places.
Can you sleep tonight without worry tonight now?
There's a coincidence. The style of this Richo response is *exactly*
the same style that Fraudster adopted when his lies were first
challenged. A mixture of sneering sarcasm, Real Man sexism, selective
snipping and furious use of the bicycle pump that's deep in his arse.
On 16/01/2026 10:24 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So you have no answer then.
On 16/01/2026 4:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
The phantom snipper strikes again.
And why did you do that Richo? Something to hide?
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would
have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
Oh, did I upset you by not answering princess?
OK I'll have to make amends, or you'll go to bed tonight all upset.
Mathmatics - starting with simple stuff like logarithms both base 10
an base e*, moving on to complex numbers and the use of polar, and
Cartesian coordinates. Then on to calculus starting with simple
differentiation, and integration, moving on to solving simultaneous
differential equations, Laplace transforms, and Fourier analysis.
Mathematical basis of active and passive electronic and electrical
components, transmission line theory, impedance matching, microwaves,
antennae etc etc.
The whole thing was to teach how to design stuff not just fix it.
* In math, e (Euler's number) is a fundamental irrational** constant,
approximately 2.71828, that serves as the base for natural logarithms
and exponential functions, representing continuous growth, like
compound interest or population growth, and appears in calculus,
finance, and
natural sciences
** Irrational number - one with an infinite number of decimal places.
Can you sleep tonight without worry tonight now?
There's a coincidence. The style of this Richo response is *exactly*
the same style that Fraudster adopted when his lies were first
challenged. A mixture of sneering sarcasm, Real Man sexism, selective
snipping and furious use of the bicycle pump that's deep in his arse.
On 16/01/2026 9:21 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- is- >>>>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example
when asked.
That's not a serious test. The dumbest fraud could cut'n'paste endless
code from any of a squillion sites.
OK then alvo, C code for an RPI 2350 to interface with a Ublox GPS
module, calculate trip time, trip distance, average speed, and display
the results on a Nextion display along with current speed, current time, current pDOP, lat and long. Split the task between the 2 CPUs in a
logical manner, use interrupts to simplify the code.
Off you go, you should be able to do it in 520 lines or less including comments.
I'm sure that you'll find exactly what you need in one of the squillionPossibly, but it'd probably be faster to get one of those one off El
sit
On 17/01/2026 2:30 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 8:24 pm, alvey wrote:Yes alvey you are sooooo a genius. Get a room you two, it's sickening to have to watch it.
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 4:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
The phantom snipper strikes again.
And why did you do that Richo? Something to hide?
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would >>>>>>> have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees, >>>>>>Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
Oh, did I upset you by not answering princess?
OK I'll have to make amends, or you'll go to bed tonight all upset.
Mathmatics - starting with simple stuff like logarithms both base 10
an base e*, moving on to complex numbers and the use of polar, and
Cartesian coordinates. Then on to calculus starting with simple
differentiation, and integration, moving on to solving simultaneous
differential equations, Laplace transforms, and Fourier analysis.
Mathematical basis of active and passive electronic and electrical
components, transmission line theory, impedance matching,
microwaves, antennae etc etc.
The whole thing was to teach how to design stuff not just fix it.
* In math, e (Euler's number) is a fundamental irrational**
constant, approximately 2.71828, that serves as the base for natural
logarithms and exponential functions, representing continuous
growth, like compound interest or population growth, and appears in
calculus, finance, and
natural sciences
** Irrational number - one with an infinite number of decimal places.
Can you sleep tonight without worry tonight now?
There's a coincidence. The style of this Richo response is *exactly*
the same style that Fraudster adopted when his lies were first
challenged. A mixture of sneering sarcasm, Real Man sexism, selective
snipping and furious use of the bicycle pump that's deep in his arse.
lol, and so true.
On 17/01/2026 1:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 7:36 pm, Xeno wrote:Out with the shovel yet again even more clocky shit to dig through
On 16/1/2026 9:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:04 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 2:18 pm, alvey wrote:True and there is a whole lot of shit from your cult to did through.
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would >>>>>>>> have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees, >>>>>>>Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
He's only got one shovel.
No cult here. You're worshiping at the altar of the cult of Darren.
Too bad Darren has turned out to be a *false prophet*.
Yep, "JD" Richo has gone all in and sacrificed any integrity he might
have had in the process.
On 17/01/2026 9:26 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:45 am, alvey wrote:Maybe your followers are.
keithr0 wrote:Hey, maybe one of them is a sock puppet???
On 16/01/2026 5:50 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 12:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- car-
is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid >>>>>>>>> twice as much as others because he was so good yet not
qualified as he denigrated people with real qualifications in >>>>>>>>> the group as per usual - before getting smacked down. For such >>>>>>>>> an underachiever he sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice >>>>>>>> as much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, >>>>>>> as per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good >>>>>>> at what
I do."
Quote (your version):
"Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as *OTHERS* because he was so good yet not qualified >>>>>> as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as
per usual"
When what I said was
"I still get paid more than *TWICE THE AVERAGE WAGE* 'coz I'm good >>>>>> at what I do."
Usual clocky distortion.
Your usual keith mushbrained and pathetic weaseling in vain you
mean. I was paraphrasing from memory not that it makes one iota of
difference to what you claimed. You clearly stated that "I still
get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what I
do.".
Your words.
"Others" includes your co-workers when talking about the average
wage and you clearly claimed you were getting paid *more* than
double. Period. End of story. Just as I said. No distortion.
You're an egotistical bullshit artist keith and you got your arse
handed to you *again*. It's no wonder you spend so much time
enabling a compulsive liar, you're a cut from the same cloth.
I'm not sure what reality you're living in but it sure ain't the one
that the rest of us are.
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are
you sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always come up
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is
invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't be
able to get up...
short on. It's either never provided or is totally irrelevant to the
claims made. I give you a photo of white cable ties as *evidence* of
possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren is 100% irrelevant to the
motor trade and always has been.
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I challenged you to prove that you could.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>> was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example
when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some GPS thing
or something claiming that you were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
road in your haste to leave.
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:21 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>> was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example
when asked.
That's not a serious test. The dumbest fraud could cut'n'paste
endless code from any of a squillion sites.
OK then alvo, C code for an RPI 2350 to interface with a Ublox GPS
module, calculate trip time, trip distance, average speed, and display
the results on a Nextion display along with current speed, current
time, current pDOP, lat and long. Split the task between the 2 CPUs in
a logical manner, use interrupts to simplify the code.
Off you go, you should be able to do it in 520 lines or less including
comments.
Why? I was pointing out the uselessness of asking someone to do code
over the net.
I'm sure that you'll find exactly what you need in one of thePossibly, but it'd probably be faster to get one of those one off El
squillion sit
Cheapo online contractors to do it.
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I challenged you
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified
fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>>> was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example >>>>> when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some GPS thing
or something claiming that you were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
to prove that you could.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone can
program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program an
Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be sooper
speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or some bullshit like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. But when
you were asked to provide some proof of your superior programming
abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away of course, as always.
At which point it was reasonable to conclude that you were full of shit,
as per usual.
On 17/1/2026 3:57 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:39 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 10:15 pm, alvey wrote:See my reply to alvo and apologise. I know that you won't because you
keithr0 wrote:Pick any imaginary company, he will anyway.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that >>>>>>> was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
and your fellow cultist never admit that you were wrong.
Proof?? There's a lack of it on your side of things.
On 17/01/2026 12:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always come up
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is
invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't be
able to get up...
short on. It's either never provided or is totally irrelevant to the
claims made. I give you a photo of white cable ties as *evidence* of
possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren is 100% irrelevant to the
motor trade and always has been.
Quite a lot more than any of the Noddy cult of dishonesty members, you included, have.
On 17/01/2026 1:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:26 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:45 am, alvey wrote:Maybe your followers are.
keithr0 wrote:Hey, maybe one of them is a sock puppet???
On 16/01/2026 5:50 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 12:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid >>>>>>>>>> twice as much as others because he was so good yet not
qualified as he denigrated people with real qualifications in >>>>>>>>>> the group as per usual - before getting smacked down. For such >>>>>>>>>> an underachiever he sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice >>>>>>>>> as much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the
liar, as per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good >>>>>>>> at what
I do."
Quote (your version):
"Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as *OTHERS* because he was so good yet not
qualified as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the >>>>>>> group as per usual"
When what I said was
"I still get paid more than *TWICE THE AVERAGE WAGE* 'coz I'm
good at what I do."
Usual clocky distortion.
Your usual keith mushbrained and pathetic weaseling in vain you
mean. I was paraphrasing from memory not that it makes one iota of >>>>>> difference to what you claimed. You clearly stated that "I still
get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what I >>>>>> do.".
Your words.
"Others" includes your co-workers when talking about the average
wage and you clearly claimed you were getting paid *more* than
double. Period. End of story. Just as I said. No distortion.
You're an egotistical bullshit artist keith and you got your arse >>>>>> handed to you *again*. It's no wonder you spend so much time
enabling a compulsive liar, you're a cut from the same cloth.
I'm not sure what reality you're living in but it sure ain't the
one that the rest of us are.
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are
you sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
A "No you" post. What were you saying about "No you" posts again, dumbarse?
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:24 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So you have no answer then.
On 16/01/2026 4:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
The phantom snipper strikes again.
And why did you do that Richo? Something to hide?
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would >>>>>>> have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees, >>>>>>Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
Oh, did I upset you by not answering princess?
OK I'll have to make amends, or you'll go to bed tonight all upset.
Mathmatics - starting with simple stuff like logarithms both base 10
an base e*, moving on to complex numbers and the use of polar, and
Cartesian coordinates. Then on to calculus starting with simple
differentiation, and integration, moving on to solving simultaneous
differential equations, Laplace transforms, and Fourier analysis.
Mathematical basis of active and passive electronic and electrical
components, transmission line theory, impedance matching,
microwaves, antennae etc etc.
The whole thing was to teach how to design stuff not just fix it.
* In math, e (Euler's number) is a fundamental irrational**
constant, approximately 2.71828, that serves as the base for natural
logarithms and exponential functions, representing continuous
growth, like compound interest or population growth, and appears in
calculus, finance, and
natural sciences
** Irrational number - one with an infinite number of decimal places.
Can you sleep tonight without worry tonight now?
There's a coincidence. The style of this Richo response is *exactly*
the same style that Fraudster adopted when his lies were first
challenged. A mixture of sneering sarcasm, Real Man sexism, selective
snipping and furious use of the bicycle pump that's deep in his arse.
I asked you four OT questions Ritcho, *none* of which you have responded
to. You carried on like an Early Fraudster and concluded with an idiotic
one so the balls-up is comprehensively in your court. Care to have
another go?
On 17/01/2026 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 2:30 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 8:24 pm, alvey wrote:Yes alvey you are sooooo a genius. Get a room you two, it's sickening
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 4:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
The phantom snipper strikes again.
And why did you do that Richo? Something to hide?
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would >>>>>>>> have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees, >>>>>>>Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
Oh, did I upset you by not answering princess?
OK I'll have to make amends, or you'll go to bed tonight all upset.
Mathmatics - starting with simple stuff like logarithms both base
10 an base e*, moving on to complex numbers and the use of polar,
and Cartesian coordinates. Then on to calculus starting with simple >>>>> differentiation, and integration, moving on to solving simultaneous >>>>> differential equations, Laplace transforms, and Fourier analysis.
Mathematical basis of active and passive electronic and electrical
components, transmission line theory, impedance matching,
microwaves, antennae etc etc.
The whole thing was to teach how to design stuff not just fix it.
* In math, e (Euler's number) is a fundamental irrational**
constant, approximately 2.71828, that serves as the base for
natural logarithms and exponential functions, representing
continuous growth, like compound interest or population growth, and >>>>> appears in calculus, finance, and
natural sciences
** Irrational number - one with an infinite number of decimal places. >>>>>
Can you sleep tonight without worry tonight now?
There's a coincidence. The style of this Richo response is *exactly*
the same style that Fraudster adopted when his lies were first
challenged. A mixture of sneering sarcasm, Real Man sexism,
selective snipping and furious use of the bicycle pump that's deep
in his arse.
lol, and so true.
to have to watch it.
Nobody is forcing you to watch you perv.
On 17/01/2026 1:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 1:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 7:36 pm, Xeno wrote:Out with the shovel yet again even more clocky shit to dig through
On 16/1/2026 9:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:04 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 2:18 pm, alvey wrote:True and there is a whole lot of shit from your cult to did through.
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would >>>>>>>>> have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees, >>>>>>>>Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices? >>>>>>>>Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
He's only got one shovel.
No cult here. You're worshiping at the altar of the cult of Darren.
Too bad Darren has turned out to be a *false prophet*.
Yep, "JD" Richo has gone all in and sacrificed any integrity he might
have had in the process.
You posted shit now you get to dig, JD.
On 17/01/2026 6:00 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Where is the fun and satisfaction in that? Presumably, you have never
On 16/01/2026 9:21 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified
fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>>> was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example >>>>> when asked.
That's not a serious test. The dumbest fraud could cut'n'paste
endless code from any of a squillion sites.
OK then alvo, C code for an RPI 2350 to interface with a Ublox GPS
module, calculate trip time, trip distance, average speed, and
display the results on a Nextion display along with current speed,
current time, current pDOP, lat and long. Split the task between the
2 CPUs in a logical manner, use interrupts to simplify the code.
Off you go, you should be able to do it in 520 lines or less
including comments.
Why? I was pointing out the uselessness of asking someone to do code
over the net.
I'm sure that you'll find exactly what you need in one of thePossibly, but it'd probably be faster to get one of those one off El
squillion sit
Cheapo online contractors to do it.
built something just for the hell of it.
On 17/01/2026 6:00 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Where is the fun and satisfaction in that?
On 16/01/2026 9:21 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified
fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>>> was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example >>>>> when asked.
That's not a serious test. The dumbest fraud could cut'n'paste
endless code from any of a squillion sites.
OK then alvo, C code for an RPI 2350 to interface with a Ublox GPS
module, calculate trip time, trip distance, average speed, and
display the results on a Nextion display along with current speed,
current time, current pDOP, lat and long. Split the task between the
2 CPUs in a logical manner, use interrupts to simplify the code.
Off you go, you should be able to do it in 520 lines or less
including comments.
Why? I was pointing out the uselessness of asking someone to do code
over the net.
I'm sure that you'll find exactly what you need in one of thePossibly, but it'd probably be faster to get one of those one off El
squillion sit
Cheapo online contractors to do it.
Presumably, you have never built something just for the hell of it.
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I challenged you
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an
example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some GPS
thing or something claiming that you were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
to prove that you could.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone can
program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and upload it.
arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing. Even that fuckwit
you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program an
Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be sooper
speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or some bullshit
like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. But
when you were asked to provide some proof of your superior programming
abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
On 16/01/2026 10:13 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 11:05 pm, Clocky wrote:I never met him there, but it was a big Fortune 500 company.
On 16/01/2026 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:Oh yeah! I suspect Darren also worked there!
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that >>>>>>> was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- car-
is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Makebelieve Inc.
On 17/01/2026 4:36 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 3:57 pm, keithr0 wrote:Proof of what?
On 16/01/2026 9:39 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 10:15 pm, alvey wrote:See my reply to alvo and apologise. I know that you won't because you
keithr0 wrote:Pick any imaginary company, he will anyway.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that >>>>>>>> was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:What language?
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us. >>>>>>>>>
That's curious.
And which company was this?
and your fellow cultist never admit that you were wrong.
Proof?? There's a lack of it on your side of things.
On 17/01/2026 7:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always come
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is
invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't be >>>>> able to get up...
up short on. It's either never provided or is totally irrelevant to
the claims made. I give you a photo of white cable ties as
*evidence* of possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren is 100%
irrelevant to the motor trade and always has been.
Quite a lot more than any of the Noddy cult of dishonesty members, you
included, have.
The only verifiable proof that he has ever provided was about the train accident.
On 17/01/2026 7:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:It's lie
On 17/01/2026 2:30 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 8:24 pm, alvey wrote:Yes alvey you are sooooo a genius. Get a room you two, it's sickening
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 4:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
The phantom snipper strikes again.
And why did you do that Richo? Something to hide?
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would >>>>>>>>> have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees, >>>>>>>>Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices? >>>>>>>>Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
Oh, did I upset you by not answering princess?
OK I'll have to make amends, or you'll go to bed tonight all upset. >>>>>>
Mathmatics - starting with simple stuff like logarithms both base >>>>>> 10 an base e*, moving on to complex numbers and the use of polar, >>>>>> and Cartesian coordinates. Then on to calculus starting with
simple differentiation, and integration, moving on to solving
simultaneous differential equations, Laplace transforms, and
Fourier analysis.
Mathematical basis of active and passive electronic and electrical >>>>>> components, transmission line theory, impedance matching,
microwaves, antennae etc etc.
The whole thing was to teach how to design stuff not just fix it.
* In math, e (Euler's number) is a fundamental irrational**
constant, approximately 2.71828, that serves as the base for
natural logarithms and exponential functions, representing
continuous growth, like compound interest or population growth,
and appears in calculus, finance, and
natural sciences
** Irrational number - one with an infinite number of decimal places. >>>>>>
Can you sleep tonight without worry tonight now?
There's a coincidence. The style of this Richo response is
*exactly* the same style that Fraudster adopted when his lies were
first challenged. A mixture of sneering sarcasm, Real Man sexism,
selective snipping and furious use of the bicycle pump that's deep
in his arse.
lol, and so true.
to have to watch it.
Nobody is forcing you to watch you perv.
On 17/01/2026 7:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 1:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:"No you" again.
On 17/01/2026 1:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 7:36 pm, Xeno wrote:Out with the shovel yet again even more clocky shit to dig through
On 16/1/2026 9:41 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:04 pm, Clocky wrote:No cult here. You're worshiping at the altar of the cult of Darren. >>>>> Too bad Darren has turned out to be a *false prophet*.
On 16/01/2026 2:18 pm, alvey wrote:True and there is a whole lot of shit from your cult to did through. >>>>>
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that >>>>>>>>>> would have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get >>>>>>>>>> degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices? >>>>>>>>>Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
He's only got one shovel.
Yep, "JD" Richo has gone all in and sacrificed any integrity he
might have had in the process.
You posted shit now you get to dig, JD.
On 17/01/2026 7:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always come
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is
invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't be >>>>> able to get up...
up short on. It's either never provided or is totally irrelevant to
the claims made. I give you a photo of white cable ties as
*evidence* of possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren is 100%
irrelevant to the motor trade and always has been.
Quite a lot more than any of the Noddy cult of dishonesty members, you
included, have.
The only verifiable proof that he has ever provided was about the train accident.
On 17/01/2026 6:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 7:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always come
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is
invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't
be able to get up...
up short on. It's either never provided or is totally irrelevant to >>>>> the claims made. I give you a photo of white cable ties as
*evidence* of possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren is 100%
irrelevant to the motor trade and always has been.
Quite a lot more than any of the Noddy cult of dishonesty members,
you included, have.
The only verifiable proof that he has ever provided was about the
train accident.
Not so.
On 17/01/2026 9:26 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:45 am, alvey wrote:Maybe your followers are.
keithr0 wrote:Hey, maybe one of them is a sock puppet???
On 16/01/2026 5:50 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 12:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- car-
is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid >>>>>>>>> twice as much as others because he was so good yet not
qualified as he denigrated people with real qualifications in >>>>>>>>> the group as per usual - before getting smacked down. For such >>>>>>>>> an underachiever he sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice >>>>>>>> as much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the liar, >>>>>>> as per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good >>>>>>> at what
I do."
Quote (your version):
"Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as *OTHERS* because he was so good yet not qualified >>>>>> as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as
per usual"
When what I said was
"I still get paid more than *TWICE THE AVERAGE WAGE* 'coz I'm good >>>>>> at what I do."
Usual clocky distortion.
Your usual keith mushbrained and pathetic weaseling in vain you
mean. I was paraphrasing from memory not that it makes one iota of
difference to what you claimed. You clearly stated that "I still
get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what I
do.".
Your words.
"Others" includes your co-workers when talking about the average
wage and you clearly claimed you were getting paid *more* than
double. Period. End of story. Just as I said. No distortion.
You're an egotistical bullshit artist keith and you got your arse
handed to you *again*. It's no wonder you spend so much time
enabling a compulsive liar, you're a cut from the same cloth.
I'm not sure what reality you're living in but it sure ain't the one
that the rest of us are.
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are
you sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
On 17/01/2026 7:45 am, alvey wrote:
You seem you have some sort of hangup about my DNA, at least is carries
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are you
sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
on to a greater or lesser extent in 21 descendants.
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified
fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What >>>>>>>> was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
was relevant to the task.
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
was relevant to the task.
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing.
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after what I roughly calculate was your retirement.
On 16/01/2026 10:24 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So you have no answer then.
On 16/01/2026 4:18 pm, alvey wrote:
alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
snip
The phantom snipper strikes again.
And why did you do that Richo? Something to hide?
Well it ran for 5 years not 3, and included subjects that would
have fried your brain.
What subjects were these? And where did you do it?
Out of the 30 of us in my year, at least 8 went on to get degrees,
Did you get one? And if 'Yes', where from?
and at least 2 became PhDs, how about your fellow apprentices?
Yeah, that's helpful.
You missed responding to this one Richo.
Oh, did I upset you by not answering princess?
OK I'll have to make amends, or you'll go to bed tonight all upset.
Mathmatics - starting with simple stuff like logarithms both base 10
an base e*, moving on to complex numbers and the use of polar, and
Cartesian coordinates. Then on to calculus starting with simple
differentiation, and integration, moving on to solving simultaneous
differential equations, Laplace transforms, and Fourier analysis.
Mathematical basis of active and passive electronic and electrical
components, transmission line theory, impedance matching, microwaves,
antennae etc etc.
The whole thing was to teach how to design stuff not just fix it.
* In math, e (Euler's number) is a fundamental irrational** constant,
approximately 2.71828, that serves as the base for natural logarithms
and exponential functions, representing continuous growth, like
compound interest or population growth, and appears in calculus,
finance, and
natural sciences
** Irrational number - one with an infinite number of decimal places.
Can you sleep tonight without worry tonight now?
There's a coincidence. The style of this Richo response is *exactly*
the same style that Fraudster adopted when his lies were first
challenged. A mixture of sneering sarcasm, Real Man sexism, selective
snipping and furious use of the bicycle pump that's deep in his arse.
arse." (HUH?)the same style that Fraudster adopted when his lies were first
challenged. A mixture of sneering sarcasm, Real Man sexism, selective
snipping and furious use of the bicycle pump that's deep in his
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I challenged
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an
example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some GPS
thing or something claiming that you were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
you to prove that you could.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone can
program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and upload it.
arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing. Even that fuckwit
you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program an
Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be sooper
speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or some bullshit
like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks.
But when you were asked to provide some proof of your superior
programming abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away of course,
as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that is JD
Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to the crunch you
run away with your tail between your legs. Always.
On 16/01/2026 9:21 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional
programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an example
when asked.
That's not a serious test. The dumbest fraud could cut'n'paste endless
code from any of a squillion sites.
OK then alvo, C code for an RPI 2350 to interface with a Ublox GPS
module, calculate trip time, trip distance, average speed, and display
the results on a Nextion display along with current speed, current time, current pDOP, lat and long. Split the task between the 2 CPUs in a
logical manner, use interrupts to simplify the code.
Off you go, you should be able to do it in 520 lines or less including comments.
I'm sure that you'll find exactly what you need in one of the squillion sites.
keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 7:45 am, alvey wrote:
You seem you have some sort of hangup about my DNA, at least is
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are
you sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
carries on to a greater or lesser extent in 21 descendants.
21 isn't a lot. Did the Sperm Bank take you off the donor list after
some negative feedback from the parents?
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
was relevant to the task.
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing.
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after what I roughly calculate was your retirement.
On 16/01/2026 10:10 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:03 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:58 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 1:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:09 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 11:23 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Yada tada yada same shit different day.
Fact. Endless firmware and software updates prove how useless
programmers are. Not surprising when they have mushbrains like you >>>>>> doing the programming.
On 3/01/2026 9:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
<snip stuff that I have no answer for>
A great impression of Usain Bolt.
Just one example of endless cases of "Software engineer" and
"programmer" gross incompetence;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WiQAOmESH0
So a niche car manufacturer hired a (probably cheap) bunch of
incompetent programmers
Assumption and there is no evidence that you were competent.
Neither is there any evidence of your competence.
No wonder when even illogical mushbrains like you get a title of
"programmer" or "software engineer" assuming you weren't lying about
that too.
You're the liar boy.
That's your worthless opinion, I brought the evidence proving *you*
are a liar.
No you didn't your "Evidence" was just a load of crap.
On 16/01/2026 9:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 8:22 pm, Xeno wrote:
Bullshit. A lot of people on the spectrum have never had an officialBet he's never worked for a large corporation (that is if he exists at
diagnosis. How would HR know? How would HR *legally* weed them out?
Then, FWIW, People on the spectrum are being actively sought out for
roles in IT. One of my friends, now close to retirement, has been
obviously on the spectrum since his days at Uni - full on geek. He
has been a good friend since 1982 when we met at a geek meeting. He
has never had trouble finding IT work in spite of him obviously being
on the spectrum yet to this day undiagnosed. In fact, most at the
geek meeting were clearly on the spectrum.
all)
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
On 16/01/2026 8:11 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 8:22 pm, Xeno wrote:
Bullshit. A lot of people on the spectrum have never had an officialBet he's never worked for a large corporation (that is if he exists
diagnosis. How would HR know? How would HR *legally* weed them out?
Then, FWIW, People on the spectrum are being actively sought out for
roles in IT. One of my friends, now close to retirement, has been
obviously on the spectrum since his days at Uni - full on geek. He
has been a good friend since 1982 when we met at a geek meeting. He
has never had trouble finding IT work in spite of him obviously
being on the spectrum yet to this day undiagnosed. In fact, most at
the geek meeting were clearly on the spectrum.
at all)
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
Imaginary? He gave you a phone number and what did you do? On with the running shoes and away you went!
You even had to invent friends and dignitaries to attend an imaginary
BBQ at your place - and that turned out to be a street party elsewhere
that you presumably didn't get an invite to you deceitful blowhard :-)
keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:26 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:45 am, alvey wrote:Maybe your followers are.
keithr0 wrote:Hey, maybe one of them is a sock puppet???
On 16/01/2026 5:50 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 12:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:05 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 1:47 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid >>>>>>>>>> twice as much as others because he was so good yet not
qualified as he denigrated people with real qualifications in >>>>>>>>>> the group as per usual - before getting smacked down. For such >>>>>>>>>> an underachiever he sure likes to boast.
If you can't point to a post where I said that I got paid twice >>>>>>>>> as much as the others, then you are lying as usual
*More* than twice as much, and I'll prove that *you're* the
liar, as per usual.
Same thread on 08/03/2014 keithr boasted;
"I still get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good >>>>>>>> at what
I do."
Quote (your version):
"Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid
twice as much as *OTHERS* because he was so good yet not
qualified as he denigrated people with real qualifications in the >>>>>>> group as per usual"
When what I said was
"I still get paid more than *TWICE THE AVERAGE WAGE* 'coz I'm
good at what I do."
Usual clocky distortion.
Your usual keith mushbrained and pathetic weaseling in vain you
mean. I was paraphrasing from memory not that it makes one iota of >>>>>> difference to what you claimed. You clearly stated that "I still
get paid more than twice the average wage 'coz I'm good at what I >>>>>> do.".
Your words.
"Others" includes your co-workers when talking about the average
wage and you clearly claimed you were getting paid *more* than
double. Period. End of story. Just as I said. No distortion.
You're an egotistical bullshit artist keith and you got your arse >>>>>> handed to you *again*. It's no wonder you spend so much time
enabling a compulsive liar, you're a cut from the same cloth.
I'm not sure what reality you're living in but it sure ain't the
one that the rest of us are.
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are
you sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
Whoops! That's *another* Fraudterism there Richo. Sociopaths believe
that any group of people who resist their 'charms' *must* be being lead
by a single person. This is because that is how they operate themselves.
And besides, I've told you before, we're an anarco-syndicalist
collective. (Only without an Executive Officer)
On 18/01/2026 4:06 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 7:45 am, alvey wrote:
You seem you have some sort of hangup about my DNA, at least is
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are
you sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
carries on to a greater or lesser extent in 21 descendants.
21 isn't a lot. Did the Sperm Bank take you off the donor list after
some negative feedback from the parents?
He's had a few cumbacks?
On 16/01/2026 8:11 pm, Noddy wrote:
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
Imaginary? He gave you a phone number and what did you do? On with the running shoes and away you went!
You even had to invent friends and dignitaries to attend an imaginary
BBQ at your place - and that turned out to be a street party elsewhere
that you presumably didn't get an invite to you deceitful blowhard :-)
"retirement".
They probably pushed the dead wood out the door.
On 18/01/2026 12:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
"retirement".
They probably pushed the dead wood out the door.
Presumably now that you've had your laugh, you'll be giving us the name
of the companies you've worked for. So we can all laugh about your vocational adventures.
Shit, I can almost here the sound of you running away already :)
On 17/1/2026 10:50 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:Indeed not so. I provided ample proof - verifiable too, of my status as
On 17/01/2026 7:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always come >>>>>> up short on. It's either never provided or is totally irrelevant
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is >>>>>>>>> invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't >>>>>>> be able to get up...
to the claims made. I give you a photo of white cable ties as
*evidence* of possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren is 100% >>>>>> irrelevant to the motor trade and always has been.
Quite a lot more than any of the Noddy cult of dishonesty members,
you included, have.
The only verifiable proof that he has ever provided was about the
train accident.
Not so.
a mechanic and a teacher, I offered up reg numbers of my qualifications,
and when I countermanded Darren's technical lies, I offered up heaps of links to reputable sources that backed up my technical thoughts - like
the recent one on bearing crush. I even gave a *logic flow* of my
thought processes as I diagnosed what caused that valve head to drop off
and wreck an engine Darren worked on. FFS, Daryl even provided a link
that showed Darren was a liar - the hours, and years, AME apprentices
attend TAFE. That was funny! That led to further enlightenment about AME apprenticeship entry levels - year 10. Darren couldn't have qualified
for that role even if he had graduated from year 9.
keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 7:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always come
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is
invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't
be able to get up...
up short on. It's either never provided or is totally irrelevant to >>>>> the claims made. I give you a photo of white cable ties as
*evidence* of possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren is 100%
irrelevant to the motor trade and always has been.
Quite a lot more than any of the Noddy cult of dishonesty members,
you included, have.
The only verifiable proof that he has ever provided was about the
train accident.
And what verifiable proof of any of his big claims has the Fraudster
ever supplied Richo?
On 17/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 4:36 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 3:57 pm, keithr0 wrote:Proof of what?
On 16/01/2026 9:39 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 10:15 pm, alvey wrote:See my reply to alvo and apologise. I know that you won't because
keithr0 wrote:Pick any imaginary company, he will anyway.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the company >>>>>>>>>>> called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
you and your fellow cultist never admit that you were wrong.
Proof?? There's a lack of it on your side of things.
Intelligence, integrity and honesty for starters.
On 17/01/2026 12:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:13 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 11:05 pm, Clocky wrote:I never met him there, but it was a big Fortune 500 company.
On 16/01/2026 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:Oh yeah! I suspect Darren also worked there!
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that >>>>>>>> was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:What language?
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us. >>>>>>>>>
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Makebelieve Inc.
Don't undersell yourself Richo, I'm sure in your mind Makebelieve Inc.
is a huuuuuuge fortune 500 company.
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
was relevant to the task.
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing.
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after what I roughly calculate was your retirement.
On 18/1/2026 7:22 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:That would have been about the time the company realised that hiring
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that >>>>>>> was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing.
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after what
I roughly calculate was your retirement.
cheap unskilled and unqualified workers was a waste of their investment.
On 18/01/2026 4:22 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that >>>>>>> was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing.
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after what
I roughly calculate was your retirement.
"retirement".
They probably pushed the dead wood out the door.
On 18/1/2026 5:46 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 18/01/2026 12:07 pm, Clocky wrote:The number of companies you've worked for would be a very short list.
"retirement".
They probably pushed the dead wood out the door.
Presumably now that you've had your laugh, you'll be giving us the
name of the companies you've worked for. So we can all laugh about
your vocational adventures.
Shit, I can almost here the sound of you running away already :)
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I challenged
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an
example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some GPS
thing or something claiming that you were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
you to prove that you could.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone can
program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and upload it.
arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing. Even that fuckwit
you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program an
Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be sooper
speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or some bullshit
like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks.
But when you were asked to provide some proof of your superior
programming abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away of course,
as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that is JD
Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to the crunch you
run away with your tail between your legs. Always.
On 17/01/2026 6:26 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:00 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Where is the fun and satisfaction in that? Presumably, you have never
On 16/01/2026 9:21 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an
example when asked.
That's not a serious test. The dumbest fraud could cut'n'paste
endless code from any of a squillion sites.
OK then alvo, C code for an RPI 2350 to interface with a Ublox GPS
module, calculate trip time, trip distance, average speed, and
display the results on a Nextion display along with current speed,
current time, current pDOP, lat and long. Split the task between the
2 CPUs in a logical manner, use interrupts to simplify the code.
Off you go, you should be able to do it in 520 lines or less
including comments.
Why? I was pointing out the uselessness of asking someone to do code
over the net.
I'm sure that you'll find exactly what you need in one of thePossibly, but it'd probably be faster to get one of those one off El
squillion sit
Cheapo online contractors to do it.
built something just for the hell of it.
It's even better when other people demand the product you designed and
built for yourself and you end up making a profit from it :-)
keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:00 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Where is the fun and satisfaction in that?
On 16/01/2026 9:21 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an
example when asked.
That's not a serious test. The dumbest fraud could cut'n'paste
endless code from any of a squillion sites.
OK then alvo, C code for an RPI 2350 to interface with a Ublox GPS
module, calculate trip time, trip distance, average speed, and
display the results on a Nextion display along with current speed,
current time, current pDOP, lat and long. Split the task between the
2 CPUs in a logical manner, use interrupts to simplify the code.
Off you go, you should be able to do it in 520 lines or less
including comments.
Why? I was pointing out the uselessness of asking someone to do code
over the net.
I'm sure that you'll find exactly what you need in one of thePossibly, but it'd probably be faster to get one of those one off El
squillion sit
Cheapo online contractors to do it.
You've missed the point.
Presumably, you have never built something just for the hell of it.
Don't tell me. You built the Concorde for fun.
On 17/01/2026 12:35 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:10 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:03 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:58 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 1:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:09 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 11:23 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified
fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Yada tada yada same shit different day.
Fact. Endless firmware and software updates prove how useless
programmers are. Not surprising when they have mushbrains like
you doing the programming.
On 3/01/2026 9:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
<snip stuff that I have no answer for>
A great impression of Usain Bolt.
Just one example of endless cases of "Software engineer" and
"programmer" gross incompetence;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WiQAOmESH0
So a niche car manufacturer hired a (probably cheap) bunch of
incompetent programmers
Assumption and there is no evidence that you were competent.
Neither is there any evidence of your competence.
Of course there is.
No wonder when even illogical mushbrains like you get a title of
"programmer" or "software engineer" assuming you weren't lying
about that too.
You're the liar boy.
That's your worthless opinion, I brought the evidence proving *you*
are a liar.
No you didn't your "Evidence" was just a load of crap.
So you admit your own words were "just a load of crap".
We agree on that.
On 17/01/2026 10:40 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 10:50 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:Indeed not so. I provided ample proof - verifiable too, of my status
On 17/01/2026 7:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is >>>>>>>>>> invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't >>>>>>>> be able to get up...
come up short on. It's either never provided or is totally
irrelevant to the claims made. I give you a photo of white cable >>>>>>> ties as *evidence* of possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren >>>>>>> is 100% irrelevant to the motor trade and always has been.
Quite a lot more than any of the Noddy cult of dishonesty members,
you included, have.
The only verifiable proof that he has ever provided was about the
train accident.
Not so.
as a mechanic and a teacher, I offered up reg numbers of my
qualifications,
You posted a number that may or may not be that of a mechanic's licence.
and when I countermanded Darren's technical lies, I offered up heaps
of links to reputable sources that backed up my technical thoughts -
like the recent one on bearing crush. I even gave a *logic flow* of my
thought processes as I diagnosed what caused that valve head to drop
off and wreck an engine Darren worked on. FFS, Daryl even provided a
link that showed Darren was a liar - the hours, and years, AME
apprentices attend TAFE. That was funny! That led to further
enlightenment about AME apprenticeship entry levels - year 10. Darren
couldn't have qualified for that role even if he had graduated from
year 9.
A lot of opinions, but not hard proof.
On 17/01/2026 10:04 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:We aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
On 17/01/2026 7:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always come >>>>>> up short on. It's either never provided or is totally irrelevant
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is >>>>>>>>> invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't >>>>>>> be able to get up...
to the claims made. I give you a photo of white cable ties as
*evidence* of possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren is 100% >>>>>> irrelevant to the motor trade and always has been.
Quite a lot more than any of the Noddy cult of dishonesty members,
you included, have.
The only verifiable proof that he has ever provided was about the
train accident.
And what verifiable proof of any of his big claims has the Fraudster
ever supplied Richo?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very good,
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an
independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- >>>>>>>>> is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool,
like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice
as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per usual
- before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he sure
likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain has
obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a small >>>> group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees in the >>>> subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who people
come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were totally
unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others were as good
as one man short.
Sooo, if this job was so "brain-frying" how could "totally unqualified" people do it?
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from someone
with no recent practical experience and getting a piece of paper at
the end.
What a coincidence! *All* the remaining DATEs chant this mantra
regularly. Can't imagine why...
On 18/01/2026 11:13 am, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:35 pm, keithr0 wrote:Pathetic, kindergarten logic, you must have cheated on your exams to get
On 16/01/2026 10:10 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:03 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:58 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 1:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:09 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 11:23 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Yada tada yada same shit different day.
Fact. Endless firmware and software updates prove how useless >>>>>>>> programmers are. Not surprising when they have mushbrains like >>>>>>>> you doing the programming.
On 3/01/2026 9:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
<snip stuff that I have no answer for>
A great impression of Usain Bolt.
Just one example of endless cases of "Software engineer" and
"programmer" gross incompetence;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WiQAOmESH0
So a niche car manufacturer hired a (probably cheap) bunch of
incompetent programmers
Assumption and there is no evidence that you were competent.
Neither is there any evidence of your competence.
Of course there is.
No wonder when even illogical mushbrains like you get a title of
"programmer" or "software engineer" assuming you weren't lying
about that too.
You're the liar boy.
That's your worthless opinion, I brought the evidence proving *you*
are a liar.
No you didn't your "Evidence" was just a load of crap.
So you admit your own words were "just a load of crap".
We agree on that.
a mechanics licence.
On 15/01/2026 5:59 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 2:24 pm, jonz wrote:
On 15-Jan-26 2:47 PM, Clocky wrote:I've worked with all sorts, some were highly qualified and very good,
On 15/01/2026 10:16 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m-car- is- >>>>>>>>>> coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified fool, >>>>>>> like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". What
was the actual claim?
Yep, and he overdosed on ego in a thread claiming he got paid twice >>>>> as much as others because he was so good yet not qualified as he
denigrated people with real qualifications in the group as per
usual - before getting smacked down. For such an underachiever he
sure likes to boast.
But if his claim is true and he was ever a programmer his brain has >>>>> obviously turned to mush since.
03/03/2014 in thread "LPG price?" Keithr wrote;
"Definitely he couldn't have done it today, but then I work in a small >>>>> group of software developers all of whom except me have degrees in the >>>>> subject including one halfway through his masters. Guess who people >>>>> come
to for advice and the really tricky jobs?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙The only *real* qualification is *ABILITY*.
˙˙˙˙˙ Some can only *Talk the talk* *(copy wally, Et-Al)
˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ Those that *Walk the walk* just get on with it!.>
others despite their qualificatios were useless, there were totally
unqualified people who did an excellent job, while others were as
good as one man short.
Sooo, if this job was so "brain-frying" how could "totally
unqualified" people do it?
Sometimes learning the hard way beats being spoon fed from someone
with no recent practical experience and getting a piece of paper at
the end.
What a coincidence! *All* the remaining DATEs chant this mantra
regularly. Can't imagine why...
So you can't imagine the truth, yearh, I can believe that.
On 18/01/2026 12:30 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 8:11 pm, Noddy wrote:
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
Imaginary? He gave you a phone number and what did you do? On with the
running shoes and away you went!
Just like you did when you threatened to call the local tyre dealer here
and get the "real story". You shit yourself and went whisper quiet when
I gave you the number and told you who to ask for :)
You even had to invent friends and dignitaries to attend an imaginary
BBQ at your place - and that turned out to be a street party elsewhere
that you presumably didn't get an invite to you deceitful blowhard :-)
ROTFL :)
You live 4 thousand fucking km's away you ignoramus. You have absolutely
no idea what you're talking about :)
On 18/01/2026 10:59 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 4:06 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 7:45 am, alvey wrote:
You seem you have some sort of hangup about my DNA, at least is
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are
you sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
carries on to a greater or lesser extent in 21 descendants.
21 isn't a lot. Did the Sperm Bank take you off the donor list after
some negative feedback from the parents?
He's had a few cumbacks?
Oh alvey what a wonderful putdown, you are a genius lick lick.
On 18/01/2026 12:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
"retirement".
They probably pushed the dead wood out the door.
Presumably now that you've had your laugh, you'll be giving us the name
of the companies you've worked for. So we can all laugh about your vocational adventures.
Shit, I can almost here the sound of you running away already :)
On 18/01/2026 6:22 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that >>>>>>> was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- car-
is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing.
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after what
I roughly calculate was your retirement.
The next time that you prove anything, I may decide to show proof or not.
In the time that I worked there the shares went from $15 to $100, after splitting 3 times, then dropped to $5 in the tech wreck of 2000, finally climbing back up to $45 before Dell took over. They were a nice little earner.
keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 10:59 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 4:06 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 7:45 am, alvey wrote:
You seem you have some sort of hangup about my DNA, at least is
*Another* Fraudsterism. Incorrect use of a collective pronoun. Are >>>>>> you sure that you don't share some DNA with Buffo?
carries on to a greater or lesser extent in 21 descendants.
21 isn't a lot. Did the Sperm Bank take you off the donor list after
some negative feedback from the parents?
He's had a few cumbacks?
Oh alvey what a wonderful putdown, you are a genius lick lick.
Well one things for certain... English is one language that you're crap at...
On 17/01/2026 10:04 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:We aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
On 17/01/2026 7:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always come >>>>>> up short on. It's either never provided or is totally irrelevant
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is >>>>>>>>> invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't >>>>>>> be able to get up...
to the claims made. I give you a photo of white cable ties as
*evidence* of possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren is 100% >>>>>> irrelevant to the motor trade and always has been.
Quite a lot more than any of the Noddy cult of dishonesty members,
you included, have.
The only verifiable proof that he has ever provided was about the
train accident.
And what verifiable proof of any of his big claims has the Fraudster
ever supplied Richo?
On 18/01/2026 12:30 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 8:11 pm, Noddy wrote:
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
Imaginary? He gave you a phone number and what did you do? On with the
running shoes and away you went!
Just like you did when you threatened to call the local tyre dealer here
and get the "real story". You shit yourself and went whisper quiet when
I gave you the number and told you who to ask for :)
You even had to invent friends and dignitaries to attend an imaginary
BBQ at your place - and that turned out to be a street party elsewhere
that you presumably didn't get an invite to you deceitful blowhard :-)
ROTFL :)
You live 4 thousand fucking km's away you ignoramus. You have absolutely
no idea what you're talking about :)
On 18/01/2026 12:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
"retirement".
They probably pushed the dead wood out the door.
Presumably now that you've had your laugh, you'll be giving us the name
of the companies you've worked for. So we can all laugh about your vocational adventures.
Shit, I can almost here the sound of you running away already :)
On 18/01/2026 6:22 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that >>>>>>> was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- car-
is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing.
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after what
I roughly calculate was your retirement.
The next time that you prove anything, I may decide to show proof or not.
In the time that I worked there the shares went from $15 to $100, after splitting 3 times, then dropped to $5 in the tech wreck of 2000, finally climbing back up to $45 before Dell took over. They were a nice little earner.
On 18/01/2026 11:07 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 4:22 am, alvey wrote:Clueless clocky strikes again.
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that >>>>>>>> was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:What language?
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us. >>>>>>>>>
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing.
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after what
I roughly calculate was your retirement.
"retirement".
They probably pushed the dead wood out the door.
On 17/01/2026 9:34 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:26 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:00 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Where is the fun and satisfaction in that? Presumably, you have never
On 16/01/2026 9:21 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- car-
is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an
example when asked.
That's not a serious test. The dumbest fraud could cut'n'paste
endless code from any of a squillion sites.
OK then alvo, C code for an RPI 2350 to interface with a Ublox GPS
module, calculate trip time, trip distance, average speed, and
display the results on a Nextion display along with current speed,
current time, current pDOP, lat and long. Split the task between
the 2 CPUs in a logical manner, use interrupts to simplify the code. >>>>>
Off you go, you should be able to do it in 520 lines or less
including comments.
Why? I was pointing out the uselessness of asking someone to do code
over the net.
I'm sure that you'll find exactly what you need in one of thePossibly, but it'd probably be faster to get one of those one off El
squillion sit
Cheapo online contractors to do it.
built something just for the hell of it.
It's even better when other people demand the product you designed and
built for yourself and you end up making a profit from it :-)
Your point is?
On 18/01/2026 11:13 am, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:35 pm, keithr0 wrote:Pathetic, kindergarten logic, you must have cheated on your exams to get
On 16/01/2026 10:10 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:03 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:58 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 1:09 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:09 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 11:23 am, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric-m- >>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Yada tada yada same shit different day.
Fact. Endless firmware and software updates prove how useless >>>>>>>> programmers are. Not surprising when they have mushbrains like >>>>>>>> you doing the programming.
On 3/01/2026 9:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
<snip stuff that I have no answer for>
A great impression of Usain Bolt.
Just one example of endless cases of "Software engineer" and
"programmer" gross incompetence;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WiQAOmESH0
So a niche car manufacturer hired a (probably cheap) bunch of
incompetent programmers
Assumption and there is no evidence that you were competent.
Neither is there any evidence of your competence.
Of course there is.
No wonder when even illogical mushbrains like you get a title of
"programmer" or "software engineer" assuming you weren't lying
about that too.
You're the liar boy.
That's your worthless opinion, I brought the evidence proving *you*
are a liar.
No you didn't your "Evidence" was just a load of crap.
So you admit your own words were "just a load of crap".
We agree on that.
a mechanics licence.
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I challenged
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:What language?
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us. >>>>>>>>>
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an
example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some GPS
thing or something claiming that you were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
you to prove that you could.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone can
program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and upload
it. arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing. Even that
fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program an
Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be sooper
speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or some bullshit
like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks.
But when you were asked to provide some proof of your superior
programming abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away of course,
as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even comprehend
my response so instead you just keep lying and evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that is JD
Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to the crunch you
run away with your tail between your legs. Always.
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
On 18/01/2026 2:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 18/01/2026 12:30 pm, Clocky wrote:It was pointless making that call when blind Freddy could see that the
On 16/01/2026 8:11 pm, Noddy wrote:
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
Imaginary? He gave you a phone number and what did you do? On with
the running shoes and away you went!
Just like you did when you threatened to call the local tyre dealer
here and get the "real story". You shit yourself and went whisper
quiet when I gave you the number and told you who to ask for :)>
tyre was completely fucked as was clearly evidenced by the photo.
You even had to invent friends and dignitaries to attend an imaginary
BBQ at your place - and that turned out to be a street party
elsewhere that you presumably didn't get an invite to you deceitful
blowhard :-)
ROTFL :)
You live 4 thousand fucking km's away you ignoramus. You have
absolutely no idea what you're talking about :)
You revealed it yourself you fucking clown.
On 19/01/2026 4:14 am, Clocky wrote:
Which is something you *always* do. You *always* wait for someone *else*
to start man argument before deciding to jump in and have a crack, and
the only logical reason anyone can see for that is because you're
insecure and too gutless to start off in case you make a cunt out of yourself.
Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 4:14 am, Clocky wrote:
Which is something you *always* do. You *always* wait for someone
*else* to start man argument before deciding to jump in and have a
crack, and the only logical reason anyone can see for that is because
you're insecure and too gutless to start off in case you make a cunt
out of yourself.
Right. So he's "insecure", but you're the one incorrectly using, for the millionth time, a collective pronoun. Well played Buffo.
On 18/1/2026 6:30 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 10:04 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:We aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
On 17/01/2026 7:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is >>>>>>>>>> invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't >>>>>>>> be able to get up...
come up short on. It's either never provided or is totally
irrelevant to the claims made. I give you a photo of white cable >>>>>>> ties as *evidence* of possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren >>>>>>> is 100% irrelevant to the motor trade and always has been.
Quite a lot more than any of the Noddy cult of dishonesty members,
you included, have.
The only verifiable proof that he has ever provided was about the
train accident.
And what verifiable proof of any of his big claims has the Fraudster
ever supplied Richo?
You might not be - but we are!
On 18/01/2026 3:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 11:07 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 4:22 am, alvey wrote:Clueless clocky strikes again.
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the company >>>>>>>>>>> called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing.
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after
what I roughly calculate was your retirement.
"retirement".
They probably pushed the dead wood out the door.
Nope, most likely that I hit the nail on the head.
On 18/01/2026 3:37 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 6:22 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else that >>>>>>>> was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:What language?
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a professional >>>>>>>>>> programmer or "Software engineer" as the company called us. >>>>>>>>>
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing.
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after what
I roughly calculate was your retirement.
The next time that you prove anything, I may decide to show proof or not.
In the time that I worked there the shares went from $15 to $100,
after splitting 3 times, then dropped to $5 in the tech wreck of 2000,
finally climbing back up to $45 before Dell took over. They were a
nice little earner.
Yep, those are words.
The problem with you having no integrity is that they are completely meaningless.
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I challenged >>>>>> you to prove that you could.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the company >>>>>>>>>>> called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an >>>>>>>>> example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some GPS >>>>>>> thing or something claiming that you were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone can >>>>> program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and upload
it. arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing. Even that
fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program an
Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be sooper >>>>> speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or some bullshit >>>>> like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks.
But when you were asked to provide some proof of your superior
programming abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away of
course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even comprehend
my response so instead you just keep lying and evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that is JD
Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to the crunch you
run away with your tail between your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the distance
demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - but when
asked to produce some of your code that you claimed you wrote from
scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you are lying.
On 19/01/2026 4:14 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 2:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 18/01/2026 12:30 pm, Clocky wrote:It was pointless making that call when blind Freddy could see that the
On 16/01/2026 8:11 pm, Noddy wrote:
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
Imaginary? He gave you a phone number and what did you do? On with
the running shoes and away you went!
Just like you did when you threatened to call the local tyre dealer
here and get the "real story". You shit yourself and went whisper
quiet when I gave you the number and told you who to ask for :)>
tyre was completely fucked as was clearly evidenced by the photo.
No shit. That's exactly what I said in the original post. Still, it
never stopped you from going off on a mindless rant and threatening to
call the tyre dealer anyway.
Just like the noise you made about Les's Lotus when you initially said
"It would help if you used the correct lifting points, or is that as
high as you went?" You had no problem with what you saw the pics, until
your mental mate chimed in and turned a mole hill into a shitfest
mountain at which point you then decided to run away with yourself.
Which is something you *always* do. You *always* wait for someone *else*
to start man argument before deciding to jump in and have a crack, and
the only logical reason anyone can see for that is because you're
insecure and too gutless to start off in case you make a cunt out of yourself.
Which you often do :)
You even had to invent friends and dignitaries to attend an
imaginary BBQ at your place - and that turned out to be a street
party elsewhere that you presumably didn't get an invite to you
deceitful blowhard :-)
ROTFL :)
You live 4 thousand fucking km's away you ignoramus. You have
absolutely no idea what you're talking about :)
You revealed it yourself you fucking clown.
Feel free to cite the post, Mr History revisionist.
On 19/01/2026 4:14 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 2:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 18/01/2026 12:30 pm, Clocky wrote:It was pointless making that call when blind Freddy could see that the
On 16/01/2026 8:11 pm, Noddy wrote:
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
Imaginary? He gave you a phone number and what did you do? On with
the running shoes and away you went!
Just like you did when you threatened to call the local tyre dealer
here and get the "real story". You shit yourself and went whisper
quiet when I gave you the number and told you who to ask for :)>
tyre was completely fucked as was clearly evidenced by the photo.
No shit. That's exactly what I said in the original post. Still, it
never stopped you from going off on a mindless rant and threatening to
call the tyre dealer anyway.
Just like the noise you made about Les's Lotus when you initially said
"It would help if you used the correct lifting points, or is that as
high as you went?" You had no problem with what you saw the pics
You even had to invent friends and dignitaries to attend an
imaginary BBQ at your place - and that turned out to be a street
party elsewhere that you presumably didn't get an invite to you
deceitful blowhard :-)
ROTFL :)
You live 4 thousand fucking km's away you ignoramus. You have
absolutely no idea what you're talking about :)
You revealed it yourself you fucking clown.
Feel free to cite the post, Mr History revisionist.
On 19/01/2026 8:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 4:14 am, Clocky wrote:
Which is something you *always* do. You *always* wait for someone
*else* to start man argument before deciding to jump in and have a
crack, and the only logical reason anyone can see for that is because
you're insecure and too gutless to start off in case you make a cunt
out of yourself.
Right. So he's "insecure", but you're the one incorrectly using, for
the millionth time, a collective pronoun. Well played Buffo.
YAGN
On 19/1/2026 8:04 am, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 4:14 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 2:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 18/01/2026 12:30 pm, Clocky wrote:It was pointless making that call when blind Freddy could see that
On 16/01/2026 8:11 pm, Noddy wrote:
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
Imaginary? He gave you a phone number and what did you do? On with
the running shoes and away you went!
Just like you did when you threatened to call the local tyre dealer
here and get the "real story". You shit yourself and went whisper
quiet when I gave you the number and told you who to ask for :)>
the tyre was completely fucked as was clearly evidenced by the photo.
No shit. That's exactly what I said in the original post. Still, it
never stopped you from going off on a mindless rant and threatening to
call the tyre dealer anyway.
Just like the noise you made about Les's Lotus when you initially said
"It would help if you used the correct lifting points, or is that as
Well, you *were* using the incorrect lifting points. In fact, you had no clue what those points were. You identified them as the rear hoist
points and complained they were adjacent the seat backs. Had you a clue,
and any motor mechanic apprentice training, you would not have made that mistake since apprentices are trained in identifying CofG and lifting
points in the process of raising vehicles. You obviously never even saw first first year apprentice training, unsurprising since you've never
done any apprenticeship ever. The worst though, you actually had to
elevate the vehicle to find out it was unsafe. I could have told you
that just from the car layout and where you were jacking - you had it
wrong, wrong, wrong from the get go.
high as you went?" You had no problem with what you saw the pics,
until your mental mate chimed in and turned a mole hill into a
shitfest mountain at which point you then decided to run away with
yourself.
You created the shitfest Darren, you and no one else.
On 17/01/2026 9:48 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:13 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 11:05 pm, Clocky wrote:I never met him there, but it was a big Fortune 500 company.
On 16/01/2026 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:Oh yeah! I suspect Darren also worked there!
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- m- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the company >>>>>>>>>>> called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Makebelieve Inc.
Don't undersell yourself Richo, I'm sure in your mind Makebelieve Inc.
is a huuuuuuge fortune 500 company.
I posted the name of the company, obviously you're too lazy or
incompetent to notice.
On 18/01/2026 3:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:48 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:13 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 11:05 pm, Clocky wrote:I never met him there, but it was a big Fortune 500 company.
On 16/01/2026 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:Oh yeah! I suspect Darren also worked there!
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>>
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Makebelieve Inc.
Don't undersell yourself Richo, I'm sure in your mind Makebelieve
Inc. is a huuuuuuge fortune 500 company.
I posted the name of the company, obviously you're too lazy or
incompetent to notice.
Proves absolutely nothing.
Makebelieve Inc. is far more probably based on your posting history and struggles with logic and comprehension.
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I challenged >>>>>>> you to prove that you could.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is-
coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>>
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an >>>>>>>>>> example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some GPS >>>>>>>> thing or something claiming that you were a "real" programmer. >>>>>>>>
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone
can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and
upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing. Even >>>>>> that fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program an >>>>>> Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be
sooper speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or some >>>>>> bullshit like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated
egotistical wanks. But when you were asked to provide some proof
of your superior programming abilities what did keith do? Well he >>>>>> ran away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even
comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that is JD
Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to the crunch
you run away with your tail between your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the distance
demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - but when
asked to produce some of your code that you claimed you wrote from
scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" includes
you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
On 19/01/2026 3:21 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:37 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 6:22 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first-electric- m- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per-wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the company >>>>>>>>>>> called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing.
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after
what I roughly calculate was your retirement.
The next time that you prove anything, I may decide to show proof or
not.
In the time that I worked there the shares went from $15 to $100,
after splitting 3 times, then dropped to $5 in the tech wreck of
2000, finally climbing back up to $45 before Dell took over. They
were a nice little earner.
Yep, those are words.
The problem with you having no integrity is that they are completely
meaningless.
Mr Liar and Hypocrite, claiming truth an integrity again, what a laugh
On 17/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:Gawd you're funny, how about the lies that you make up about people?
On 17/01/2026 4:36 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 3:57 pm, keithr0 wrote:Proof of what?
On 16/01/2026 9:39 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 10:15 pm, alvey wrote:See my reply to alvo and apologise. I know that you won't because
keithr0 wrote:Pick any imaginary company, he will anyway.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is-
coming-in-2027-with-one-motor-per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>>
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
you and your fellow cultist never admit that you were wrong.
Proof?? There's a lack of it on your side of things.
Intelligence, integrity and honesty for starters.
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and
unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a
"programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an >>>>>>>>>>> example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some GPS >>>>>>>>> thing or something claiming that you were a "real" programmer. >>>>>>>>>
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
challenged you to prove that you could.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone >>>>>>> can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and
upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing. Even >>>>>>> that fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program an >>>>>>> Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be
sooper speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or some >>>>>>> bullshit like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated
egotistical wanks. But when you were asked to provide some proof >>>>>>> of your superior programming abilities what did keith do? Well he >>>>>>> ran away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even
comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that is JD >>>>> Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to the crunch
you run away with your tail between your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the distance
demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - but when
asked to produce some of your code that you claimed you wrote from
scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you are
lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" includes
you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that claim,
but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple process
anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words from your cult leader whom
backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to make yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
On 19/01/2026 7:44 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:21 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:37 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 6:22 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 9:15 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>>
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Corporation
It's not even pedantic to state that your link doesn't prove a thing. >>>>>
I did notice though that the companies worth really boomed after
what I roughly calculate was your retirement.
The next time that you prove anything, I may decide to show proof or
not.
In the time that I worked there the shares went from $15 to $100,
after splitting 3 times, then dropped to $5 in the tech wreck of
2000, finally climbing back up to $45 before Dell took over. They
were a nice little earner.
Yep, those are words.
The problem with you having no integrity is that they are completely
meaningless.
Mr Liar and Hypocrite, claiming truth an integrity again, what a laugh
Yes, that's exactly who and what you are.
On 18/01/2026 3:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:48 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:13 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 11:05 pm, Clocky wrote:I never met him there, but it was a big Fortune 500 company.
On 16/01/2026 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:Oh yeah! I suspect Darren also worked there!
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>> What was the actual claim?
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it fucks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and unqualified >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fool, like you, can call themselves a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>>
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Makebelieve Inc.
Don't undersell yourself Richo, I'm sure in your mind Makebelieve
Inc. is a huuuuuuge fortune 500 company.
I posted the name of the company, obviously you're too lazy or
incompetent to notice.
Proves absolutely nothing.
Makebelieve Inc. is far more probably based on your posting history and struggles with logic and comprehension.
On 18/01/2026 3:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:Gawd you're funny, how about the lies that you make up about people?
On 17/01/2026 4:36 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 3:57 pm, keithr0 wrote:Proof of what?
On 16/01/2026 9:39 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 10:15 pm, alvey wrote:See my reply to alvo and apologise. I know that you won't because >>>>>> you and your fellow cultist never admit that you were wrong.
keithr0 wrote:Pick any imaginary company, he will anyway.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and
unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a
"programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Proof?? There's a lack of it on your side of things.
Intelligence, integrity and honesty for starters.
See signatures. In your own words you are the proven liar.
Feel free to prove otherwise.
On 18/01/2026 3:30 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 10:04 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:We aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
On 17/01/2026 7:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:30 am, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 8:49 am, alvey wrote:And what evidence have you provided over the years?
keithr0 wrote:Yeah, "evidence", the one primary thing the Noddy cult always
On 16/01/2026 6:23 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
Flinging accusations is your hobby not mine.
My flinging is done with supporting evidence Richo. Yours is >>>>>>>>>> invariably based solely on your opinion.
"Evidence" ROTFL
You should be careful with your ROTFLs Ritcho. One day you won't >>>>>>>> be able to get up...
come up short on. It's either never provided or is totally
irrelevant to the claims made. I give you a photo of white cable >>>>>>> ties as *evidence* of possession of *coloured* cable ties. Darren >>>>>>> is 100% irrelevant to the motor trade and always has been.
Quite a lot more than any of the Noddy cult of dishonesty members,
you included, have.
The only verifiable proof that he has ever provided was about the
train accident.
And what verifiable proof of any of his big claims has the Fraudster
ever supplied Richo?
It's a valid question you keep running away from and the primary reason
you lack any kind of credibility.
On 19/01/2026 5:04 am, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 4:14 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 2:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 18/01/2026 12:30 pm, Clocky wrote:It was pointless making that call when blind Freddy could see that
On 16/01/2026 8:11 pm, Noddy wrote:
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
Imaginary? He gave you a phone number and what did you do? On with
the running shoes and away you went!
Just like you did when you threatened to call the local tyre dealer
here and get the "real story". You shit yourself and went whisper
quiet when I gave you the number and told you who to ask for :)>
the tyre was completely fucked as was clearly evidenced by the photo.
No shit. That's exactly what I said in the original post. Still, it
never stopped you from going off on a mindless rant and threatening to
call the tyre dealer anyway.
Just like the noise you made about Les's Lotus when you initially said
"It would help if you used the correct lifting points, or is that as
high as you went?" You had no problem with what you saw the pics
So saying "It would help if you used the correct lifting points" is
saying there is no problem?
Looks like you didn't speak English at age 9 either.
<snip irrelevant rant>
You even had to invent friends and dignitaries to attend an
imaginary BBQ at your place - and that turned out to be a street
party elsewhere that you presumably didn't get an invite to you
deceitful blowhard :-)
ROTFL :)
You live 4 thousand fucking km's away you ignoramus. You have
absolutely no idea what you're talking about :)
You revealed it yourself you fucking clown.
Feel free to cite the post, Mr History revisionist.
Why? So you can deny your own posts again before launching into yet
another barrage of lies, deflection and personal attacks?
On 19/01/2026 2:12 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:Gawd
On 17/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:Gawd you're funny, how about the lies that you make up about people?
On 17/01/2026 4:36 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 3:57 pm, keithr0 wrote:Proof of what?
On 16/01/2026 9:39 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 10:15 pm, alvey wrote:See my reply to alvo and apologise. I know that you won't because >>>>>>> you and your fellow cultist never admit that you were wrong.
keithr0 wrote:Pick any imaginary company, he will anyway.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a
"programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Proof?? There's a lack of it on your side of things.
Intelligence, integrity and honesty for starters.
See signatures. In your own words you are the proven liar.
Feel free to prove otherwise.
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a
"programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an >>>>>>>>>>>> example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some >>>>>>>>>> GPS thing or something claiming that you were a "real"
programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
challenged you to prove that you could.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone >>>>>>>> can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and >>>>>>>> upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing.
Even that fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program >>>>>>>> an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be >>>>>>>> sooper speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or
some bullshit like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated >>>>>>>> egotistical wanks. But when you were asked to provide some proof >>>>>>>> of your superior programming abilities what did keith do? Well >>>>>>>> he ran away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even
comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and evading. >>>>>>
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that is
JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to the
crunch you run away with your tail between your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the distance
demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - but when
asked to produce some of your code that you claimed you wrote from
scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you are
lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" includes
you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that claim,
but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple process
anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was rubbed
through your own shit here are the words from your cult leader whom
backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
On 19/01/2026 11:22 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:I worked for
On 17/01/2026 9:48 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:13 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 11:05 pm, Clocky wrote:I never met him there, but it was a big Fortune 500 company.
On 16/01/2026 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:Oh yeah! I suspect Darren also worked there!
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and
unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a
"programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Makebelieve Inc.
Don't undersell yourself Richo, I'm sure in your mind Makebelieve
Inc. is a huuuuuuge fortune 500 company.
I posted the name of the company, obviously you're too lazy or
incompetent to notice.
Proves absolutely nothing.
Makebelieve Inc. is far more probably based on your posting history
and struggles with logic and comprehension.
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a
"programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an >>>>>>>>>>>> example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some >>>>>>>>>> GPS thing or something claiming that you were a "real"
programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
challenged you to prove that you could.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone >>>>>>>> can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and >>>>>>>> upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing.
Even that fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program >>>>>>>> an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be >>>>>>>> sooper speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or
some bullshit like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated >>>>>>>> egotistical wanks. But when you were asked to provide some proof >>>>>>>> of your superior programming abilities what did keith do? Well >>>>>>>> he ran away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even
comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and evading. >>>>>>
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that is
JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to the
crunch you run away with your tail between your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the distance
demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - but when
asked to produce some of your code that you claimed you wrote from
scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you are
lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" includes
you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that claim,
but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple process
anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was rubbed
through your own shit here are the words from your cult leader whom
backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" includes
you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Twist as much as you like, that is what you said.
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an >>>>>>>>>>>>> example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some >>>>>>>>>>> GPS thing or something claiming that you were a "real"
programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
challenged you to prove that you could.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone >>>>>>>>> can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and >>>>>>>>> upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing. >>>>>>>>> Even that fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program >>>>>>>>> an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be >>>>>>>>> sooper speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or >>>>>>>>> some bullshit like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated >>>>>>>>> egotistical wanks. But when you were asked to provide some
proof of your superior programming abilities what did keith do? >>>>>>>>> Well he ran away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even
comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and evading. >>>>>>>
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that is >>>>>>> JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to the
crunch you run away with your tail between your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the distance >>>>>> demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - but
when asked to produce some of your code that you claimed you wrote
from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you are
lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" includes
you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that claim,
but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple process
anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was rubbed
through your own shit here are the words from your cult leader whom
backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question has to >>> be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. You're >>> not going to win a trophy for having done something that you consider to >>> be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to make >>> yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that claim,
but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple process
anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words from your cult leader whom
backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to make yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
On 19/01/2026 11:22 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:I worked for EMC for 18 years, 15 of which as a programmer for which I
On 17/01/2026 9:48 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:13 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 11:05 pm, Clocky wrote:I never met him there, but it was a big Fortune 500 company.
On 16/01/2026 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:Oh yeah! I suspect Darren also worked there!
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and
unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a
"programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Makebelieve Inc.
Don't undersell yourself Richo, I'm sure in your mind Makebelieve
Inc. is a huuuuuuge fortune 500 company.
I posted the name of the company, obviously you're too lazy or
incompetent to notice.
Proves absolutely nothing.
Makebelieve Inc. is far more probably based on your posting history
and struggles with logic and comprehension.
was very well rewarded, I retired at 74 on my own terms. I lived in the
US for over 5 years while working for them.
Deal with it. It is quite obvious that you are insanely jealous of
anybody who has made more of their life than you have (not a
particularly difficult task).
The subject is now closed, rant as muchas you like, I don't give a shit.
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On 19/01/2026 11:22 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:I worked for
On 17/01/2026 9:48 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:13 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 11:05 pm, Clocky wrote:I never met him there, but it was a big Fortune 500 company.
On 16/01/2026 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:Oh yeah! I suspect Darren also worked there!
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a
"programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Makebelieve Inc.
Don't undersell yourself Richo, I'm sure in your mind Makebelieve
Inc. is a huuuuuuge fortune 500 company.
I posted the name of the company, obviously you're too lazy or
incompetent to notice.
Proves absolutely nothing.
Makebelieve Inc. is far more probably based on your posting history
and struggles with logic and comprehension.
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Remember?
On 18/01/2026 3:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:Gawd you're funny, how about the lies that you make up about people?
On 17/01/2026 4:36 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 3:57 pm, keithr0 wrote:Proof of what?
On 16/01/2026 9:39 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 10:15 pm, alvey wrote:See my reply to alvo and apologise. I know that you won't because >>>>>> you and your fellow cultist never admit that you were wrong.
keithr0 wrote:Pick any imaginary company, he will anyway.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and
unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a
"programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Proof?? There's a lack of it on your side of things.
Intelligence, integrity and honesty for starters.
See signatures. In your own words you are the proven liar.
Feel free to prove otherwise.
On 19/01/2026 2:12 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:Gawd you're funny, how about the lies that you make up about people?
On 17/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:Gawd you're funny, how about the lies that you make up about people?
On 17/01/2026 4:36 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 17/1/2026 3:57 pm, keithr0 wrote:Proof of what?
On 16/01/2026 9:39 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 10:15 pm, alvey wrote:See my reply to alvo and apologise. I know that you won't because >>>>>>> you and your fellow cultist never admit that you were wrong.
keithr0 wrote:Pick any imaginary company, he will anyway.
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a
"programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Proof?? There's a lack of it on your side of things.
Intelligence, integrity and honesty for starters.
See signatures. In your own words you are the proven liar.
Feel free to prove otherwise.
On 19/01/2026 8:29 am, Xeno wrote:
You created the shitfest Darren, you and no one else.
No, according to him -˙ "It would help if you used the correct lifting points" means there was no problem observed.
Make it make sense.
On 18/01/2026 5:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
He is the only thing that you're capable of talking about, anything elseWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
You might not be - but we are!
and you're totally out of your depth.
On 19/01/2026 3:11 am, Clocky wrote:
The valid answer is that you, xeno, and avlo are the only people onWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
It's a valid question you keep running away from and the primary
reason you lack any kind of credibility.
earth who even give a shit. The entire population of the world less you
3 couldn't care less.
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."
Remember?
On 18/01/2026 2:46 pm, Noddy wrote:
Presumably now that you've had your laugh, you'll be giving us the
name of the companies you've worked for. So we can all laugh about
your vocational adventures.
Shit, I can almost here the sound of you running away already :)
Says the bloke who "worked" from under his mum's patio, had a spell
cleaning cars and then "retired" to a shed out in the boonies
fabricating bullshit.
On 19/01/2026 11:50 am, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 8:29 am, Xeno wrote:
You created the shitfest Darren, you and no one else.
No, according to him -˙ "It would help if you used the correct lifting
points" means there was no problem observed.
Make it make sense.
The "is that as high as you went?" comment suggested that you had no
problem with what you saw given that the car was only an inch off the ground.
Not that your approval was ever required.....
On 19/01/2026 10:41 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 5:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
He is the only thing that you're capable of talking about, anythingWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
You might not be - but we are!
else and you're totally out of your depth.
You have to wonder what goes on in their fucked up heads if all they
want to do around here is talk about me day after day.
I mean, I know I'm a pretty cool guy, but Jesus :)
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about yourself
is bullshit given that you have never proven a single bit of it.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you?
On 19/01/2026 4:18 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 2:46 pm, Noddy wrote:
Presumably now that you've had your laugh, you'll be giving us the
name of the companies you've worked for. So we can all laugh about
your vocational adventures.
Shit, I can almost here the sound of you running away already :)
Says the bloke who "worked" from under his mum's patio, had a spell
cleaning cars and then "retired" to a shed out in the boonies
fabricating bullshit.
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
On 19/01/2026 10:39 am, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:04 am, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 4:14 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 2:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 18/01/2026 12:30 pm, Clocky wrote:It was pointless making that call when blind Freddy could see that
On 16/01/2026 8:11 pm, Noddy wrote:
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
Imaginary? He gave you a phone number and what did you do? On with >>>>>> the running shoes and away you went!
Just like you did when you threatened to call the local tyre dealer >>>>> here and get the "real story". You shit yourself and went whisper
quiet when I gave you the number and told you who to ask for :)>
the tyre was completely fucked as was clearly evidenced by the photo.
No shit. That's exactly what I said in the original post. Still, it
never stopped you from going off on a mindless rant and threatening
to call the tyre dealer anyway.
Just like the noise you made about Les's Lotus when you initially
said "It would help if you used the correct lifting points, or is
that as high as you went?" You had no problem with what you saw the pics
So saying "It would help if you used the correct lifting points" is
saying there is no problem?
Looks like you didn't speak English at age 9 either.
<snip irrelevant rant>
You even had to invent friends and dignitaries to attend an
imaginary BBQ at your place - and that turned out to be a street
party elsewhere that you presumably didn't get an invite to you
deceitful blowhard :-)
ROTFL :)
You live 4 thousand fucking km's away you ignoramus. You have
absolutely no idea what you're talking about :)
You revealed it yourself you fucking clown.
Feel free to cite the post, Mr History revisionist.
Why? So you can deny your own posts again before launching into yet
another barrage of lies, deflection and personal attacks?
Exit clocky chased by a bear.
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as an >>>>>>>>>>>>> example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some >>>>>>>>>>> GPS thing or something claiming that you were a "real"
programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
challenged you to prove that you could.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and anyone >>>>>>>>> can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if required and >>>>>>>>> upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That proves nothing. >>>>>>>>> Even that fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program >>>>>>>>> an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to be >>>>>>>>> sooper speshal programmer because you did it from scratch or >>>>>>>>> some bullshit like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated >>>>>>>>> egotistical wanks. But when you were asked to provide some
proof of your superior programming abilities what did keith do? >>>>>>>>> Well he ran away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even
comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and evading. >>>>>>>
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that is >>>>>>> JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to the
crunch you run away with your tail between your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the distance >>>>>> demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - but
when asked to produce some of your code that you claimed you wrote
from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you are
lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" includes
you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that claim,
but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple process
anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was rubbed
through your own shit here are the words from your cult leader whom
backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question has to >>> be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. You're >>> not going to win a trophy for having done something that you consider to >>> be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to make >>> yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that claim,
but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple process
anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words from your cult leader whom
backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to make yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
On 19/01/2026 6:01 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:11 am, Clocky wrote:
The valid answer is that you, xeno, and avlo are the only people onWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
It's a valid question you keep running away from and the primary
reason you lack any kind of credibility.
earth who even give a shit. The entire population of the world less
you 3 couldn't care less.
Exactly.
On 19/01/2026 11:22 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:33 pm, keithr0 wrote:I worked for EMC for 18 years, 15 of which as a programmer for which I
On 17/01/2026 9:48 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:53 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:13 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 16/1/2026 11:05 pm, Clocky wrote:I never met him there, but it was a big Fortune 500 company.
On 16/01/2026 7:15 pm, alvey wrote:Oh yeah! I suspect Darren also worked there!
keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 6:28 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:Why? BTW, I forgot to mention Jscript, PHP and SQL
On 15/01/2026 6:10 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:C, C++, Pascal (Delphi), SYMPL, Perl, C#, and anything else >>>>>>>>>>> that was relevant to the task.
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an independent motor per wheel.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> per-wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and
unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a
"programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a
professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
That's curious.
And which company was this?
Makebelieve Inc.
Don't undersell yourself Richo, I'm sure in your mind Makebelieve
Inc. is a huuuuuuge fortune 500 company.
I posted the name of the company, obviously you're too lazy or
incompetent to notice.
Proves absolutely nothing.
Makebelieve Inc. is far more probably based on your posting history
and struggles with logic and comprehension.
was very well rewarded,
I retired at 74 on my own terms. I lived in the
US for over 5 years while working for them.
Deal with it. It is quite obvious that you are insanely jealous of
anybody who has made more of their life than you have (not a
particularly difficult task).
The subject is now closed, rant as muchas you like, I don't give a shit.
On 19/01/2026 4:18 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 2:46 pm, Noddy wrote:
Presumably now that you've had your laugh, you'll be giving us the
name of the companies you've worked for. So we can all laugh about
your vocational adventures.
Shit, I can almost here the sound of you running away already :)
Says the bloke who "worked" from under his mum's patio, had a spell
cleaning cars and then "retired" to a shed out in the boonies
fabricating bullshit.
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz I won't
be listening.
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about yourself
is bullshit given that you have never proven a single bit of it.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you?
On 19/01/2026 11:50 am, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 8:29 am, Xeno wrote:
You created the shitfest Darren, you and no one else.
No, according to him -˙ "It would help if you used the correct lifting
points" means there was no problem observed.
Make it make sense.
The "is that as high as you went?" comment
problem with what you saw given that the car was only an inch off the ground.
Not that your approval was ever required.....
On 19/01/2026 4:18 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 2:46 pm, Noddy wrote:
Presumably now that you've had your laugh, you'll be giving us the
name of the companies you've worked for. So we can all laugh about
your vocational adventures.
Shit, I can almost here the sound of you running away already :)
Says the bloke who "worked" from under his mum's patio, had a spell
cleaning cars and then "retired" to a shed out in the boonies
fabricating bullshit.
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an independent motor per wheel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is-You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
coming-in-2027-with-one-motor- per- wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some >>>>>>>>>>>> GPS thing or something claiming that you were a "real" >>>>>>>>>>>> programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual.
challenged you to prove that you could.
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and
anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if
required and upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That >>>>>>>>>> proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can program >>>>>>>>>> an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that claimed to >>>>>>>>>> be sooper speshal programmer because you did it from scratch >>>>>>>>>> or some bullshit like that in one of your typical
hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. But when you were asked to >>>>>>>>>> provide some proof of your superior programming abilities what >>>>>>>>>> did keith do? Well he ran away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even
comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and evading. >>>>>>>>
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that is >>>>>>>> JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to the >>>>>>>> crunch you run away with your tail between your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the
distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - but
when asked to produce some of your code that you claimed you wrote >>>>>> from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you are >>>>>> lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody"
includes you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away
screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that
claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple
process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was
rubbed through your own shit here are the words from your cult
leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given >>>> that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question
has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest.
You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you
consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to
make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more conceited >>>> if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that claim,
but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple process
anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was rubbed
through your own shit here are the words from your cult leader whom
backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when you were put
on the spot, you ran away screaming.
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz I won't
be listening.
keithr0 wrote:
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz I won't
be listening.
Well there's the trifecta completed...
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
On 19/1/2026 8:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying." >>>
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about
yourself is bullshit given that you have never proven a single bit of it.
Except he has. YOU never have, you've just made claims you won't (can't) back!
On 19/01/2026 5:53 pm, Xeno wrote:
Except he has. YOU never have, you've just made claims you won't
(can't) back!
Yep, I've provided plenty of proof. He and the pommy dickhead just deny it.
He's never provided any proof of his grandiose claims, ever.
On 20/01/2026 2:09 am, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:53 pm, Xeno wrote:
Except he has. YOU never have, you've just made claims you won't
(can't) back!
Yep, I've provided plenty of proof. He and the pommy dickhead just
deny it.
Funny. Everyone must have blinked and missed it all at exactly the same time.
He's never provided any proof of his grandiose claims, ever.
There is nothing "grandoise" about any of my claims. That you choose to
believe whatever I say or not is none of my business, and not someone I could care less about.
You operate *way* above your pay grade if you think otherwise.
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*, you stupid clog
wearing imbecilic cunt. This is the bit that flies over your pig
ignorant head high enough for the Blue Angels to perform their aerobatic routine in the gap.
You carry on as if you're the sheriff of Nottingham who has some magical authority to make demands of people, when in reality you're a fucking
noise making nobody in a pissy little irrelevant newsgroup who is *not* entitled to jack shit from anyone.
This is very basic and you've been told many times before, but for some reason it just doesn't register with you. Perhaps it's due to the fact
that you're so caught up in your own image of yourself that you can't
tell night from day anymore, but the simple arithmetic here is this:
You are free to believe or disbelieve whatever the fuck you like, but no
one owes you any explanations. If you wish to believe something as
untrue then fine, but if you think anyone is obligated to lift a fucking finger to satisfy you in any way then you are more ridiculously deluded
than even I give you credit for, and trust me I think your level of
delusion is off the fucking scale.
You nothing to anyone around here, and as soon as you get a grip on
reality and stop pretending that you're a member of some special badge wearing club the better off you'll be.
On 20/01/2026 2:09 am, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:53 pm, Xeno wrote:
Except he has. YOU never have, you've just made claims you won't
(can't) back!
Yep, I've provided plenty of proof. He and the pommy dickhead just
deny it.
Funny. Everyone must have blinked and missed it all at exactly the same time.
He's never provided any proof of his grandiose claims, ever.
There is nothing "grandoise" about any of my claims.
That you choose to believe whatever I say or not is none of > my business,
and not someone I could care less about.
You operate *way* above your pay grade if you think otherwise.
On 19/01/2026 5:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying." >>>
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about
yourself is bullshit given that you have never proven a single bit of it.
It's keith's quote, stupid.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you?
It's keith's porridge being fed back to him, stupid.
On 19/01/2026 6:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I >>>>>>>>>>>> challenged you to prove that you could.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an independent motor per wheel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motor- per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for some >>>>>>>>>>>>> GPS thing or something claiming that you were a "real" >>>>>>>>>>>>> programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and >>>>>>>>>>> anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if >>>>>>>>>>> required and upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That >>>>>>>>>>> proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can
program an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that >>>>>>>>>>> claimed to be sooper speshal programmer because you did it >>>>>>>>>>> from scratch or some bullshit like that in one of your
typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. But when you were >>>>>>>>>>> asked to provide some proof of your superior programming >>>>>>>>>>> abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away of course, as >>>>>>>>>>> always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even
comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and evading. >>>>>>>>>
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that >>>>>>>>> is JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to >>>>>>>>> the crunch you run away with your tail between your legs. Always. >>>>>>>>>
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the
distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - but >>>>>>> when asked to produce some of your code that you claimed you
wrote from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you
are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody"
includes you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away
screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that
claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple >>>>> process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was
rubbed through your own shit here are the words from your cult
leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given >>>>> that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people >>>>> can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question
has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest.
You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you
consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to >>>>> make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more
conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that claim,
but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple process
anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was rubbed
through your own shit here are the words from your cult leader whom
backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question has to >>> be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. You're >>> not going to win a trophy for having done something that you consider to >>> be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to make >>> yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when you were
put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Fortunately for me your deception and lies are on record.
I *never* claimed to be a programmer and your attempted lies and
deception won't hide the fact you ran off when challenged to produce an example of your programming skills. End of story.
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz I won't
be listening.
And there is the sound of keith doing a runner as per usual.
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*.. /* snip tedious */
Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*.. /* snip tedious */
Technically true, except in a court of law (and a few other official settings), but the convention just about everywhere is, "Your claim. You
get to prove it.? Fraudster, 02Jun18. The consequence of someone
refusing to respond is traditionally to believe that they're a liar.
You made your choice Fraudster and it was a very bad & stupid one. The
best thing you could do now is to slither away to somewhere else and
start again under a new nick.
Anyway, even under a new nick, you could pick his self aggrandising (grandiose) bullshit anywhere - and his delusion, they are truly unique.
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*,
On 19/01/2026 10:41 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 5:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
He is the only thing that you're capable of talking about, anythingWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
You might not be - but we are!
else and you're totally out of your depth.
You have to wonder what goes on in their fucked up heads if all they
want to do around here is talk about me day after day.
On 19/01/2026 5:40 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 10:41 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 5:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
He is the only thing that you're capable of talking about, anythingWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
You might not be - but we are!
else and you're totally out of your depth.
You have to wonder what goes on in their fucked up heads if all they
want to do around here is talk about me day after day.
So you should be left to bullshit your brains out, tell lies about
others and falsely attribute claims to other people without pushback, is that it?
You've driven enough people away from this group in the past in
countless unwarranted personal attacks simply because they disagreed
with you on some point but now that your own bullshit and behaviour is
under the microscope ol' glassjaw Noddy wants to be left alone to lie in peace... poor diddums.
You made your bed, we're living in your head rent free and you deserve
it. Suck it up princess.
On 19/01/2026 5:40 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 10:41 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 5:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
He is the only thing that you're capable of talking about, anythingWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
You might not be - but we are!
else and you're totally out of your depth.
You have to wonder what goes on in their fucked up heads if all they
want to do around here is talk about me day after day.
So you should be left to bullshit your brains out, tell lies about
others and falsely attribute claims to other people without pushback, is that it?
You've driven enough people away from this group in the past in
countless unwarranted personal attacks simply because they disagreed
with you on some point but now that your own bullshit and behaviour is
under the microscope ol' glassjaw Noddy wants to be left alone to lie in peace... poor diddums.
You made your bed, we're living in your head rent free and you deserve
it. Suck it up princess.
On 19/01/2026 5:40 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 10:41 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 5:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
He is the only thing that you're capable of talking about, anythingWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
You might not be - but we are!
else and you're totally out of your depth.
You have to wonder what goes on in their fucked up heads if all they
want to do around here is talk about me day after day.
So you should be left to bullshit your brains out, tell lies about
others and falsely attribute claims to other people without pushback, is that it?
You've driven enough people away from this group in the past in
countless unwarranted personal attacks simply because they disagreed
with you on some point but now that your own bullshit and behaviour is
under the microscope ol' glassjaw Noddy wants to be left alone to lie in peace... poor diddums.
You made your bed, we're living in your head rent free and you deserve
it. Suck it up princess.
On 20/01/2026 1:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:40 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 10:41 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 5:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
He is the only thing that you're capable of talking about, anythingWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
You might not be - but we are!
else and you're totally out of your depth.
You have to wonder what goes on in their fucked up heads if all they
want to do around here is talk about me day after day.
So you should be left to bullshit your brains out, tell lies about
others and falsely attribute claims to other people without pushback,
is that it?
Even if that nonsense were true, what the *fuck* does it have to do with you? This is an unmoderated newsgroup, and much to your obvious
displeasure no one went on holiday and left you in charge.
You need to get the fuck over yourself, Junior. No one needs your
permission to post around here :)
You've driven enough people away from this group in the past in
countless unwarranted personal attacks simply because they disagreed
with you on some point but now that your own bullshit and behaviour is
under the microscope ol' glassjaw Noddy wants to be left alone to lie
in peace... poor diddums.
Utter bullshit. If there was any one person who has done more to drive
people away from here then it's your clog wearing mental mate and his incessant repetitive bullshit.
You made your bed, we're living in your head rent free and you deserve
it. Suck it up princess.
Not only are you delusional, but it's become abundantly clear how you
managed to emigrate from a country where English is a commonly spoken language without speaking a word of it. It's because everyone *there*
thought you were a contemptible cunt and wanted nothing to do with you
just the same as they do here.
If nothing else, you're consistent.
On 19/01/2026 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*,
That's not what you have claimed in the past, you definitely placed that onus on the claimants.
Your position is that everyone should prove their claims or be thought
of as a bullshit artist *except* when it comes to your claims. Oh no, everyone should just accept those as fact.
That's not how it works dumbarse. You get judged by your own standards
and by that judgement you most definitely *are* 100% a bullshit artist.
Your arguing with your own position you fucking loon.
On 20/01/2026 1:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:40 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 10:41 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 5:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
He is the only thing that you're capable of talking about, anythingWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
You might not be - but we are!
else and you're totally out of your depth.
You have to wonder what goes on in their fucked up heads if all they
want to do around here is talk about me day after day.
So you should be left to bullshit your brains out, tell lies about
others and falsely attribute claims to other people without pushback,
is that it?
Even if that nonsense were true,
you? This is an unmoderated newsgroup, and much to your obvious
displeasure no one went on holiday and left you in charge.
You need to get the fuck over yourself, Junior. No one needs your
permission to post around here :)
On 20/01/2026 1:23 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*,
That's not what you have claimed in the past, you definitely placed
that onus on the claimants.
It's clear English isn't your bag :)
I've placed no such "onus" on anyone, and I invite you to cite any
example where I have done so.
Your position is that everyone should prove their claims or be thought
of as a bullshit artist *except* when it comes to your claims. Oh no,
everyone should just accept those as fact.
No, that's your spin. I've never said anything of the kind, and yet
again you are bullshitting your brains out in order to create a position
from which to argue from. On the contrary, I have said a number of times
now that I couldn't care less whether people believe me or not, but you
and your mental mate simply refuse to accept that. Presumably because
you can't get your head around the fact that there are people out there
who don't give a fuck what you choose to believe.
As for other people's claims, I've asked people to feel free to support their claims in the past like many others have done, but if they've
chosen not to then so be it. What I *haven't* done is incessantly
pursued people by repeatedly asking for "proof" over and over for
*years*, as that would be totally insane.
Know what I mean?
That's not how it works dumbarse. You get judged by your own standards
and by that judgement you most definitely *are* 100% a bullshit artist.
Your arguing with your own position you fucking loon.
It's difficult to imagine anyone being more stupid than you demonstrate yourself to be, and for the life of me I simply cannot understand why
you do it. Either you really *are* this much of a fucking imbecile, or
you think what you do impresses people in some way and makes you look superior.
Like calling yourself the "voice of reason" for example. All that ever
did was make you look like a fucking twat :)
keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 10:39 am, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:04 am, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 4:14 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 2:43 pm, Noddy wrote:No shit. That's exactly what I said in the original post. Still, it
On 18/01/2026 12:30 pm, Clocky wrote:It was pointless making that call when blind Freddy could see that
On 16/01/2026 8:11 pm, Noddy wrote:
Yet *another* conveniently placed friend, huh?
Imaginary? He gave you a phone number and what did you do? On
with the running shoes and away you went!
Just like you did when you threatened to call the local tyre
dealer here and get the "real story". You shit yourself and went
whisper quiet when I gave you the number and told you who to ask
for :)>
the tyre was completely fucked as was clearly evidenced by the photo. >>>>
never stopped you from going off on a mindless rant and threatening
to call the tyre dealer anyway.
Just like the noise you made about Les's Lotus when you initially
said "It would help if you used the correct lifting points, or is
that as high as you went?" You had no problem with what you saw the
pics
So saying "It would help if you used the correct lifting points" is
saying there is no problem?
Looks like you didn't speak English at age 9 either.
<snip irrelevant rant>
You even had to invent friends and dignitaries to attend an
imaginary BBQ at your place - and that turned out to be a street >>>>>>> party elsewhere that you presumably didn't get an invite to you >>>>>>> deceitful blowhard :-)
ROTFL :)
You live 4 thousand fucking km's away you ignoramus. You have
absolutely no idea what you're talking about :)
You revealed it yourself you fucking clown.
Feel free to cite the post, Mr History revisionist.
Why? So you can deny your own posts again before launching into yet
another barrage of lies, deflection and personal attacks?
Exit clocky chased by a bear.
The pen of my aunt is in the garden...
Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:01 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:11 am, Clocky wrote:
The valid answer is that you, xeno, and avlo are the only people onWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
It's a valid question you keep running away from and the primary
reason you lack any kind of credibility.
earth who even give a shit. The entire population of the world less
you 3 couldn't care less.
Exactly.
Exactly wrong Buffo.
If it's only Clock, Xeno and me who care then what are you and Ritcho
doing here?
Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
lying."
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about
yourself is bullshit given that you have never proven a single bit of
it.
It's keith's quote, stupid.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you?
It's keith's porridge being fed back to him, stupid.
Buffo will be along soon to admit that he erred.
On 19/1/2026 11:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*, you stupid clog
Then you clearly do not understand the concept of responsibility.
˙if you make a claim, in particular an affirmative assertion or one
that challenges the status quo, the onus (burden of proof) is upon you
to substantiate it if asked. This principle, rooted in logic and debate, dictates that the person asserting a proposition *must* provide
sufficient evidence to support it, rather than requiring others to
disprove it.
The person making a claim (the proponent) bears the responsibility of providing evidence, often summarized by the Latin maxim onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat ("the burden of proof lies with
the one who speaks, not the one who denies").
Hitchens' Razor is the principle, credited to writer Christopher
Hitchens, that "what can be asserted without evidence can also be
dismissed without evidence," meaning the burden of proof lies with the person making the claim, and unsupported assertions can be rejected
without needing counter-evidence. It's a tool for critical thinking, applying the concept of skepticism to unfounded claims, especially in debates about religion or extraordinary ideas, by demanding proof from
those who propose them.
wearing imbecilic cunt. This is the bit that flies over your pig
ignorant head high enough for the Blue Angels to perform their
aerobatic routine in the gap.
The above is what flies over your pig ignorant head.
You carry on as if you're the sheriff of Nottingham who has some
magical authority to make demands of people, when in reality you're a
fucking noise making nobody in a pissy little irrelevant newsgroup who
is *not* entitled to jack shit from anyone.
Your claims to three (3) trade qualifications were, and are, over the
top. You failed to provide evidence of their veracity - so I did that
for you and found instead evidence that all were a pack of lies -
nothing in the archives, nothing in the trade register.
This is very basic and you've been told many times before, but for
some reason it just doesn't register with you. Perhaps it's due to the
fact that you're so caught up in your own image of yourself that you
can't tell night from day anymore, but the simple arithmetic here is
this:
Please don't talk about simple arithmetic, even that is too complex for
you.
You are free to believe or disbelieve whatever the fuck you like, but no
And free to make assertions about your baseless and evidence free claims.
one owes you any explanations. If you wish to believe something as
If you understand the concept of homour, you are honour bound to back up your claims with evidence when asked - so I'm asking - evidence please!
untrue then fine, but if you think anyone is obligated to lift a
fucking finger to satisfy you in any way then you are more
ridiculously deluded than even I give you credit for, and trust me I
think your level of delusion is off the fucking scale.
Delusion is your middle name Darren.
You nothing to anyone around here, and as soon as you get a grip on
reality and stop pretending that you're a member of some special badge
wearing club the better off you'll be.
Projection!
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums. It's because of people like him that that they all became *moderated* forums.
On 19-Jan-26 11:13 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I >>>>>>>>>>>>> challenged you to prove that you could.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some interesting stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an independent motor per wheel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motor- per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some GPS thing or something claiming that you were a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and >>>>>>>>>>>> anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if >>>>>>>>>>>> required and upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That >>>>>>>>>>>> proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can >>>>>>>>>>>> program an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that >>>>>>>>>>>> claimed to be sooper speshal programmer because you did it >>>>>>>>>>>> from scratch or some bullshit like that in one of your >>>>>>>>>>>> typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. But when you were >>>>>>>>>>>> asked to provide some proof of your superior programming >>>>>>>>>>>> abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away of course, as >>>>>>>>>>>> always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even >>>>>>>>>> comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and >>>>>>>>>> evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that >>>>>>>>>> is JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to >>>>>>>>>> the crunch you run away with your tail between your legs. Always. >>>>>>>>>>
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the
distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - but >>>>>>>> when asked to produce some of your code that you claimed you
wrote from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you >>>>>>>> are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody"
includes you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away
screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that
claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a
simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented >>>>>> circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was
rubbed through your own shit here are the words from your cult
leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and
given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people >>>>>> can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily >>>>>> tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question >>>>>> has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. >>>>>> You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you
consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are >>>>>> definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is
to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more
conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that
claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple
process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was
rubbed through your own shit here are the words from your cult
leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given >>>> that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question
has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest.
You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you
consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to
make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more conceited >>>> if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when you were
put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Fortunately for me your deception and lies are on record.
I *never* claimed to be a programmer and your attempted lies and
deception won't hide the fact you ran off when challenged to produce
an example of your programming skills. End of story.
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz I
won't be listening.
And there is the sound of keith doing a runner as per usual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon. Surprised
that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish imbecile..
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became *moderated*
forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
On 20/01/2026 1:23 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*,
That's not what you have claimed in the past, you definitely placed
that onus on the claimants.
It's clear English isn't your bag :)
I've placed no such "onus" on anyone,
On 20/01/2026 9:39 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
lying."
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about
yourself is bullshit given that you have never proven a single bit
of it.
It's keith's quote, stupid.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you?
It's keith's porridge being fed back to him, stupid.
Buffo will be along soon to admit that he erred.
Why don't you chatter among yourselves girls noone else can be bothered
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
On 19-Jan-26 11:13 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenged you to prove that you could.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> company called us.
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some interesting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff with an independent motor per wheel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws-first- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027-with-one- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motor- per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as an example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some GPS thing or something claiming that you were a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and >>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if >>>>>>>>>>>>> required and upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That >>>>>>>>>>>>> proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you enable agreed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the
road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can >>>>>>>>>>>>> program an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that >>>>>>>>>>>>> claimed to be sooper speshal programmer because you did it >>>>>>>>>>>>> from scratch or some bullshit like that in one of your >>>>>>>>>>>>> typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. But when you were >>>>>>>>>>>>> asked to provide some proof of your superior programming >>>>>>>>>>>>> abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away of course, as >>>>>>>>>>>>> always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even >>>>>>>>>>> comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and >>>>>>>>>>> evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why that >>>>>>>>>>> is JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it comes to >>>>>>>>>>> the crunch you run away with your tail between your legs. >>>>>>>>>>> Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the >>>>>>>>>> distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - but >>>>>>>>> when asked to produce some of your code that you claimed you >>>>>>>>> wrote from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you >>>>>>>>> are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody"
includes you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away >>>>>>>> screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that
claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a
simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented >>>>>>> circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was
rubbed through your own shit here are the words from your cult
leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and >>>>>>> given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which
people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily >>>>>>> tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question >>>>>>> has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. >>>>>>> You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you
consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are >>>>>>> definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is >>>>>>> to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more
conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that
claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a simple >>>>> process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented
circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was
rubbed through your own shit here are the words from your cult
leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and given >>>>> that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people >>>>> can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question
has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest.
You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you
consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is to >>>>> make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more
conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when you were
put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Fortunately for me your deception and lies are on record.
I *never* claimed to be a programmer and your attempted lies and
deception won't hide the fact you ran off when challenged to produce
an example of your programming skills. End of story.
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz I
won't be listening.
And there is the sound of keith doing a runner as per usual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon. Surprised
that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes him.
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became *moderated*
forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
On 20/01/2026 8:18 am, Xeno wrote:
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*, you stupid clog
Then you clearly do not understand the concept of responsibility.
˙˙if you make a claim, in particular an affirmative assertion or one
that challenges the status quo, the onus (burden of proof) is upon you
to substantiate it if asked. This principle, rooted in logic and
debate, dictates that the person asserting a proposition *must*
provide sufficient evidence to support it, rather than requiring
others to disprove it.
The person making a claim (the proponent) bears the responsibility of
providing evidence, often summarized by the Latin maxim onus probandi
incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat ("the burden of proof lies
with the one who speaks, not the one who denies").
Hitchens' Razor is the principle, credited to writer Christopher
Hitchens, that "what can be asserted without evidence can also be
dismissed without evidence," meaning the burden of proof lies with the
person making the claim, and unsupported assertions can be rejected
without needing counter-evidence. It's a tool for critical thinking,
applying the concept of skepticism to unfounded claims, especially in
debates about religion or extraordinary ideas, by demanding proof from
those who propose them.
xeno trying to sound professorial, and only proving that anybody can
google.
On 20/01/2026 12:12 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 1:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:40 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 10:41 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 5:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
He is the only thing that you're capable of talking about, anything >>>>> else and you're totally out of your depth.We aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
You might not be - but we are!
You have to wonder what goes on in their fucked up heads if all they
want to do around here is talk about me day after day.
So you should be left to bullshit your brains out, tell lies about
others and falsely attribute claims to other people without pushback,
is that it?
Even if that nonsense were true,
It is true. Proven so countless times.
what the *fuck* does it have to do with
you? This is an unmoderated newsgroup, and much to your obvious
displeasure no one went on holiday and left you in charge.
"This is an unmoderated newsgroup"
If you don't like having your glass jaw broken nobody is stopping you
from leaving.
You need to get the fuck over yourself, Junior. No one needs your
permission to post around here :)
"what the *fuck* does it have to do with
˙you?"
he farted out moments earlier.
I don't need *your* permission to post here, son.
"This is an unmoderated newsgroup"
Remember, you dumb cunt?
<snip white noise in protest>
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became *moderated*
forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
On 20/01/2026 12:31 pm, Noddy wrote:
I've placed no such "onus" on anyone,
FFS you have been quoted countless times suggesting those making the
claims get to prove them.
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon. Surprised
that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes him.
On 20/01/2026 8:18 am, Xeno wrote:
On 19/1/2026 11:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*, you stupid clog
Then you clearly do not understand the concept of responsibility.
˙˙if you make a claim, in particular an affirmative assertion or one
that challenges the status quo, the onus (burden of proof) is upon you
to substantiate it if asked. This principle, rooted in logic and
debate, dictates that the person asserting a proposition *must*
provide sufficient evidence to support it, rather than requiring
others to disprove it.
The person making a claim (the proponent) bears the responsibility of
providing evidence, often summarized by the Latin maxim onus probandi
incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat ("the burden of proof lies
with the one who speaks, not the one who denies").
Hitchens' Razor is the principle, credited to writer Christopher
Hitchens, that "what can be asserted without evidence can also be
dismissed without evidence," meaning the burden of proof lies with the
person making the claim, and unsupported assertions can be rejected
without needing counter-evidence. It's a tool for critical thinking,
applying the concept of skepticism to unfounded claims, especially in
debates about religion or extraordinary ideas, by demanding proof from
those who propose them.
xeno trying to sound professorial, and only proving that anybody can
google.
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became *moderated*
forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
On 20/1/2026 5:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became *moderated*
forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
Yeah, Darren's own words that he doesn't post on other forums.
why, he's a forum poisoner.
On 20/01/2026 5:18 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:18 am, Xeno wrote:
And be completely irrelevant in doing so.
Not one word of his cut and pasted rambling does anything to suggest
that there is an "onus" on *anyone* to prove anything to anyone else in
an informal, unmoderated discussion group like this. This is *not* a
court of law, and there is no obligation on anyone to do a thing. The
choice of whether or not to believe lies with the listener, and
regardless of whatever choice they make no one else has an obligation to satisfy them just because they may not like what they hear.
There is no concept of responsibility to be applied here, and there most
certainly does *not* need to be the display of hypocrisy we see here
that comes from the person who has made more unfounded claims in this
group than every other poster combined :)
On 20/01/2026 5:18 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:18 am, Xeno wrote:
On 19/1/2026 11:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*, you stupid clog
Then you clearly do not understand the concept of responsibility.
˙˙if you make a claim, in particular an affirmative assertion or one
that challenges the status quo, the onus (burden of proof) is upon
you to substantiate it if asked. This principle, rooted in logic and
debate, dictates that the person asserting a proposition *must*
provide sufficient evidence to support it, rather than requiring
others to disprove it.
The person making a claim (the proponent) bears the responsibility of
providing evidence, often summarized by the Latin maxim onus probandi
incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat ("the burden of proof lies
with the one who speaks, not the one who denies").
Who's work have you stolen this lot from, shit-fer-brains?>>
Hitchens' Razor is the principle, credited to writer Christopher
Hitchens, that "what can be asserted without evidence can also be
dismissed without evidence," meaning the burden of proof lies with
the person making the claim, and unsupported assertions can be
rejected without needing counter-evidence. It's a tool for critical
thinking, applying the concept of skepticism to unfounded claims,
especially in debates about religion or extraordinary ideas, by
demanding proof from those who propose them.
xeno trying to sound professorial, and only proving that anybody can
google.
And plagiarize.. Tomas the Teachers Arsehole is good at that. Ask him
about DNA... Or London Smog...
He's nothing more than a fucking thief. A lying big-noting loudmouthed fucking thief.
On 20/01/2026 2:14 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:39 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
lying."
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about
yourself is bullshit given that you have never proven a single bit
of it.
It's keith's quote, stupid.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you?
It's keith's porridge being fed back to him, stupid.
Buffo will be along soon to admit that he erred.
Why don't you chatter among yourselves girls noone else can be bothered
Running away because you know you're done, again, as always.
On 20/1/2026 8:18 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:18 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:18 am, Xeno wrote:
And be completely irrelevant in doing so.
Not one word of his cut and pasted rambling does anything to suggest
that there is an "onus" on *anyone* to prove anything to anyone else
in an informal, unmoderated discussion group like this. This is *not*
a court of law, and there is no obligation on anyone to do a thing.
The choice of whether or not to believe lies with the listener, and
regardless of whatever choice they make no one else has an obligation
to satisfy them just because they may not like what they hear.
There is no concept of responsibility to be applied here, and there most
Beg to differ! When you make a claim to be trade qualified, you are
*legally obligated* to provide proof of said claim if contested.
When
you make a claim to be trade qualified, but are indeed *not* qualified
at all, you are committing *fraud* and, for, such there are legal consequences. You also claimed membership of the VACC. Doing so whilst
not ever being a member is *also fraud*.
certainly does *not* need to be the display of hypocrisy we see here
that comes from the person who has made more unfounded claims in this
group than every other poster combined :)
That would be you! Three apprenticeships claimed, the evidence says
*NONE*, 2 trade qualifications claimed, the trade registration database
says lie, name not present. VACC membership claimed, the email response
says the VACC has no record of you or your *claimed* businesses?
On 20/01/2026 2:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became *moderated*
forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
What for since you don't even have the integrity to consider the proof
and respond to it an adult manner?
I posted verifiable proof that backed up exactly what I had said and
proved you 100% wrong and all you did was snip and deny it and just
powered on with your lies because your ego is so fragile that you can't admit you were wrong.
On 20/1/2026 5:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became *moderated*
forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
Yeah, Darren's own words that he doesn't post on other forums. I know
why, he's a forum poisoner.
On 20/01/2026 2:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
On 19-Jan-26 11:13 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenged you to prove that you could.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the company called us.
On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some interesting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff with an independent motor per wheel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first- electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with-one- motor- per- wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would cause if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as an example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some GPS thing or something claiming that you were a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if >>>>>>>>>>>>>> required and upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That >>>>>>>>>>>>>> proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you enable agreed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> program an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> claimed to be sooper speshal programmer because you did it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from scratch or some bullshit like that in one of your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. But when you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> were asked to provide some proof of your superior >>>>>>>>>>>>>> programming abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even >>>>>>>>>>>> comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and >>>>>>>>>>>> evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why >>>>>>>>>>>> that is JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it >>>>>>>>>>>> comes to the crunch you run away with your tail between your >>>>>>>>>>>> legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the >>>>>>>>>>> distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - >>>>>>>>>> but when asked to produce some of your code that you claimed >>>>>>>>>> you wrote from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, you >>>>>>>>>> are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" >>>>>>>>> includes you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away >>>>>>>>> screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that >>>>>>>> claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a
simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a
demented circular argument just as you did last time your fool >>>>>>>> nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words from >>>>>>>> your cult leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the >>>>>>>> topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and >>>>>>>> given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which >>>>>>>> people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily >>>>>>>> tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious
question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a
contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you
consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are >>>>>>>> definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is >>>>>>>> to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more >>>>>>>> conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that
claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a
simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented >>>>>> circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was
rubbed through your own shit here are the words from your cult
leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and
given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which people >>>>>> can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily >>>>>> tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question >>>>>> has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. >>>>>> You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you
consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are >>>>>> definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is
to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more
conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when you
were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Fortunately for me your deception and lies are on record.
I *never* claimed to be a programmer and your attempted lies and
deception won't hide the fact you ran off when challenged to produce
an example of your programming skills. End of story.
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz I
won't be listening.
And there is the sound of keith doing a runner as per usual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon. Surprised
that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes him.
Keep running keith. Careful you don't trip over your cooked drunken slob mate on your way out...
On 20/01/2026 8:18 am, Xeno wrote:
On 19/1/2026 11:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*, you stupid clog
Then you clearly do not understand the concept of responsibility.
˙˙if you make a claim, in particular an affirmative assertion or one
that challenges the status quo, the onus (burden of proof) is upon you
to substantiate it if asked. This principle, rooted in logic and
debate, dictates that the person asserting a proposition *must*
provide sufficient evidence to support it, rather than requiring
others to disprove it.
The person making a claim (the proponent) bears the responsibility of
providing evidence, often summarized by the Latin maxim onus probandi
incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat ("the burden of proof lies
with the one who speaks, not the one who denies").
Hitchens' Razor is the principle, credited to writer Christopher
Hitchens, that "what can be asserted without evidence can also be
dismissed without evidence," meaning the burden of proof lies with the
person making the claim, and unsupported assertions can be rejected
without needing counter-evidence. It's a tool for critical thinking,
applying the concept of skepticism to unfounded claims, especially in
debates about religion or extraordinary ideas, by demanding proof from
those who propose them.
xeno trying to sound professorial, and only proving that anybody can
google.
wearing imbecilic cunt. This is the bit that flies over your pig
ignorant head high enough for the Blue Angels to perform their
aerobatic routine in the gap.
The above is what flies over your pig ignorant head.
You carry on as if you're the sheriff of Nottingham who has some
magical authority to make demands of people, when in reality you're a
fucking noise making nobody in a pissy little irrelevant newsgroup
who is *not* entitled to jack shit from anyone.
Your claims to three (3) trade qualifications were, and are, over the
top. You failed to provide evidence of their veracity - so I did that
for you and found instead evidence that all were a pack of lies -
nothing in the archives, nothing in the trade register.
This is very basic and you've been told many times before, but for
some reason it just doesn't register with you. Perhaps it's due to
the fact that you're so caught up in your own image of yourself that
you can't tell night from day anymore, but the simple arithmetic here
is this:
Please don't talk about simple arithmetic, even that is too complex
for you.
And free to make assertions about your baseless and evidence free claims.
You are free to believe or disbelieve whatever the fuck you like, but no >>
one owes you any explanations. If you wish to believe something as
If you understand the concept of homour, you are honour bound to back
up your claims with evidence when asked - so I'm asking - evidence
please!
untrue then fine, but if you think anyone is obligated to lift a
fucking finger to satisfy you in any way then you are more
ridiculously deluded than even I give you credit for, and trust me I
think your level of delusion is off the fucking scale.
Delusion is your middle name Darren.
You nothing to anyone around here, and as soon as you get a grip on
reality and stop pretending that you're a member of some special
badge wearing club the better off you'll be.
Projection!
On 20/01/2026 5:20 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:Another irrelevant smoke screen to cover up your inability to answer a simple question.
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
On 19-Jan-26 11:13 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenged you to prove that you could.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the company called us.On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some interesting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff with an independent motor per wheel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No problem, it's in the hands of programmers not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanics :)https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first- electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with-one- motor- per- wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can just imagine the mess it would cause if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as an example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some GPS thing or something claiming that you were a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required and upload it. arduino programmed - simple. That >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you enable agreed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> program an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claimed to be sooper speshal programmer because you did >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it from scratch or some bullshit like that in one of your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. But when you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were asked to provide some proof of your superior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programming abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even >>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and >>>>>>>>>>>>> evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why >>>>>>>>>>>>> that is JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it >>>>>>>>>>>>> comes to the crunch you run away with your tail between >>>>>>>>>>>>> your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the >>>>>>>>>>>> distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - >>>>>>>>>>> but when asked to produce some of your code that you claimed >>>>>>>>>>> you wrote from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, >>>>>>>>>>> you are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" >>>>>>>>>> includes you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away >>>>>>>>>> screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that >>>>>>>>> claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a >>>>>>>>> simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a
demented circular argument just as you did last time your fool >>>>>>>>> nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words from >>>>>>>>> your cult leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the >>>>>>>>> topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", >>>>>>>>> and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which >>>>>>>>> people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily >>>>>>>>> tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious
question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a
contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you >>>>>>>>> consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you >>>>>>>>> are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here >>>>>>>>> is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more >>>>>>>>> conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that
claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a
simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a demented >>>>>>> circular argument just as you did last time your fool nose was
rubbed through your own shit here are the words from your cult
leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and >>>>>>> given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which
people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily >>>>>>> tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious question >>>>>>> has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a contest. >>>>>>> You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you
consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are >>>>>>> definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is >>>>>>> to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more
conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when you
were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Fortunately for me your deception and lies are on record.
I *never* claimed to be a programmer and your attempted lies and
deception won't hide the fact you ran off when challenged to
produce an example of your programming skills. End of story.
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz I
won't be listening.
And there is the sound of keith doing a runner as per usual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish
imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes him. >>>
Keep running keith. Careful you don't trip over your cooked drunken
slob mate on your way out...
On 20/01/2026 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon. Surprised
that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes him.
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego is
not supported by his character.
On 20/01/2026 5:57 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:31 pm, Noddy wrote:
I've placed no such "onus" on anyone,
FFS you have been quoted countless times suggesting those making the
claims get to prove them.
Indeed, and I've never argued against the idea.
On 20/01/2026 4:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became
*moderated* forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
What for since you don't even have the integrity to consider the proof
and respond to it an adult manner?
I posted verifiable proof that backed up exactly what I had said and
proved you 100% wrong and all you did was snip and deny it and just
powered on with your lies because your ego is so fragile that you
can't admit you were wrong.
What the fuck are you wittering about?
On 20/01/2026 1:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:40 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 10:41 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 5:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
He is the only thing that you're capable of talking about, anythingWe aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
You might not be - but we are!
else and you're totally out of your depth.
You have to wonder what goes on in their fucked up heads if all they
want to do around here is talk about me day after day.
So you should be left to bullshit your brains out, tell lies about
others and falsely attribute claims to other people without pushback,
is that it?
Even if that nonsense were true,
what the *fuck* does it have to do with
you? This is an unmoderated newsgroup, and much to your obvious
displeasure no one went on holiday and left you in charge.
You need to get the fuck over yourself, Junior. No one needs your
permission to post around here :)
You've driven enough people away from this group in the past in
countless unwarranted personal attacks simply because they disagreed
with you on some point but now that your own bullshit and behaviour is
under the microscope ol' glassjaw Noddy wants to be left alone to lie
in peace... poor diddums.
Utter bullshit. If there was any one person who has done more to drive people away from here then it's your clog wearing mental mate and his incessant repetitive bullshit.
You made your bed, we're living in your head rent free and you deserve
it. Suck it up princess.
Not only are you delusional, but it's become abundantly clear how you managed to emigrate from a country where English is a commonly spoken language without speaking a word of it. It's because everyone *there* thought you were a contemptible cunt and wanted nothing to do with you
just the same as they do here.
If nothing else, you're consistent.
On 20/01/2026 9:39 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
lying."
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about
yourself is bullshit given that you have never proven a single bit
of it.
It's keith's quote, stupid.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you?
It's keith's porridge being fed back to him, stupid.
Buffo will be along soon to admit that he erred.
Why don't you chatter among yourselves girls noone else can be bothered
Not utter bullshit at all Fraudster. I can name posters who left specifically because of you. Who can you name?
keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:39 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is
lying."
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about
yourself is bullshit given that you have never proven a single bit
of it.
It's keith's quote, stupid.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you?
It's keith's porridge being fed back to him, stupid.
Buffo will be along soon to admit that he erred.
Why don't you chatter among yourselves girls noone else can be bothered
Can't you use AI or something to come up with something original? (You
can continue with the inaccuracies till the AI gets sorted)
On 20/01/2026 6:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 4:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became
*moderated* forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on
about proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
What for since you don't even have the integrity to consider the
proof and respond to it an adult manner?
I posted verifiable proof that backed up exactly what I had said and
proved you 100% wrong and all you did was snip and deny it and just
powered on with your lies because your ego is so fragile that you
can't admit you were wrong.
What the fuck are you wittering about?
You have forgotten already you demented old fool?
On 20/01/2026 5:23 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:57 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:31 pm, Noddy wrote:
I've placed no such "onus" on anyone,
FFS you have been quoted countless times suggesting those making the
claims get to prove them.
Indeed, and I've never argued against the idea.
So you're just a lying hypocrite then exactly as I said.
Jesus wept...
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became *moderated*
forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:20 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:Another irrelevant smoke screen to cover up your inability to answer a
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
On 19-Jan-26 11:13 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenged you to prove that you could.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the company called us.On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some interesting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff with an independent motor per wheel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No problem, it's in the hands of programmers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not mechanics :)https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first- electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with-one- motor- per- wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can just imagine the mess it would cause >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code as an example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some GPS thing or something claiming that you were a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required and upload it. arduino programmed - simple. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you enable agreed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> program an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that claimed to be sooper speshal programmer because you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did it from scratch or some bullshit like that in one of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. But when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you were asked to provide some proof of your superior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programming abilities what did keith do? Well he ran >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes to the crunch you run away with your tail between >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the >>>>>>>>>>>>> distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - >>>>>>>>>>>> but when asked to produce some of your code that you claimed >>>>>>>>>>>> you wrote from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, >>>>>>>>>>>> you are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" >>>>>>>>>>> includes you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away >>>>>>>>>>> screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that >>>>>>>>>> claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a >>>>>>>>>> simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a
demented circular argument just as you did last time your fool >>>>>>>>>> nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words from >>>>>>>>>> your cult leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the >>>>>>>>>> topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", >>>>>>>>>> and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which >>>>>>>>>> people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be >>>>>>>>>> easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious
question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a
contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you >>>>>>>>>> consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and >>>>>>>>>> you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit". >>>>>>>>>>
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here >>>>>>>>>> is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more >>>>>>>>>> conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that >>>>>>>> claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a
simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a
demented circular argument just as you did last time your fool >>>>>>>> nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words from >>>>>>>> your cult leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the >>>>>>>> topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and >>>>>>>> given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which >>>>>>>> people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily >>>>>>>> tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious
question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a
contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you
consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are >>>>>>>> definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is >>>>>>>> to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more >>>>>>>> conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when you >>>>>>> were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Fortunately for me your deception and lies are on record.
I *never* claimed to be a programmer and your attempted lies and
deception won't hide the fact you ran off when challenged to
produce an example of your programming skills. End of story.
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz I >>>>>>> won't be listening.
And there is the sound of keith doing a runner as per usual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish
imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes
him.
Keep running keith. Careful you don't trip over your cooked drunken
slob mate on your way out...
simple question.
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish
imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes him.
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego
is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did originally.
Go back to sleep dumbarse.
keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became *moderated*
forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
Hey Detective Richo! Would it be 'hypocritical' to only interrogate one
gang in a gang war?
On 20/01/2026 1:23 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*,
That's not what you have claimed in the past, you definitely placed
that onus on the claimants.
It's clear English isn't your bag :)
I've placed no such "onus" on anyone, and I invite you to cite any
example where I have done so.
Your position is that everyone should prove their claims or be thought
of as a bullshit artist *except* when it comes to your claims. Oh no,
everyone should just accept those as fact.
No, that's your spin. I've never said anything of the kind,
On 20/01/2026 8:34 pm, lindsay wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:18 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:18 am, Xeno wrote:
On 19/1/2026 11:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*, you stupid clog
Then you clearly do not understand the concept of responsibility.
˙˙if you make a claim, in particular an affirmative assertion or one
that challenges the status quo, the onus (burden of proof) is upon
you to substantiate it if asked. This principle, rooted in logic and
debate, dictates that the person asserting a proposition *must*
provide sufficient evidence to support it, rather than requiring
others to disprove it.
The person making a claim (the proponent) bears the responsibility
of providing evidence, often summarized by the Latin maxim onus
probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat ("the burden of
proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies").
Who's work have you stolen this lot from, shit-fer-brains?>>
Hitchens' Razor is the principle, credited to writer Christopher
Hitchens, that "what can be asserted without evidence can also be
dismissed without evidence," meaning the burden of proof lies with
the person making the claim, and unsupported assertions can be
rejected without needing counter-evidence. It's a tool for critical
thinking, applying the concept of skepticism to unfounded claims,
especially in debates about religion or extraordinary ideas, by
demanding proof from those who propose them.
xeno trying to sound professorial, and only proving that anybody can
google.
And plagiarize.. Tomas the Teachers Arsehole is good at that. Ask him
about DNA... Or London Smog...
He's nothing more than a fucking thief. A lying big-noting loudmouthed
fucking thief.
Him attempting to dictate to anyone about providing support for claims
is the height of hypocrisy :)
On 20/01/2026 7:47 pm, Xeno wrote:
There is no concept of responsibility to be applied here, and there most >>Beg to differ! When you make a claim to be trade qualified, you are
*legally obligated* to provide proof of said claim if contested.
Perhaps you could point out the relevant legislation.
When you make a claim to be trade qualified, but are indeed *not*
qualified at all, you are committing *fraud* and, for, such there are
legal consequences. You also claimed membership of the VACC. Doing so
whilst not ever being a member is *also fraud*.
Definition of fraud - wrongful or criminal deception intended to result
in financial or personal gain.
Can you prove financial or personal gain.
On 20/01/2026 4:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became
*moderated* forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
What for since you don't even have the integrity to consider the proof
and respond to it an adult manner?
I posted verifiable proof that backed up exactly what I had said and
proved you 100% wrong and all you did was snip and deny it and just
powered on with your lies because your ego is so fragile that you
can't admit you were wrong.
What the fuck are you wittering about?˙ Do you have some verifiable
proof of him being expelled from all the other car forums or not?
On 20/01/2026 5:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became *moderated*
forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
Hahahahahaha˙ Well, Tomas?
On 20/01/2026 9:32 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 7:47 pm, Xeno wrote:
There is no concept of responsibility to be applied here, and there
most
Beg to differ! When you make a claim to be trade qualified, you are
*legally obligated* to provide proof of said claim if contested.
Perhaps you could point out the relevant legislation.
There is no such legal obligation. He's making shit up as usual.
When you make a claim to be trade qualified, but are indeed *not*
qualified at all, you are committing *fraud* and, for, such there are
legal consequences. You also claimed membership of the VACC. Doing so
whilst not ever being a member is *also fraud*.
Definition of fraud - wrongful or criminal deception intended to
result in financial or personal gain.
Can you prove financial or personal gain.
Lol :)
On 20/01/2026 9:55 pm, alvey wrote:
Not utter bullshit at all Fraudster. I can name posters who left
specifically because of you. Who can you name?
OK then name them, along with how you know why they left.
On 20/01/2026 5:23 pm, Noddy wrote:
FFS you have been quoted countless times suggesting those making the
claims get to prove them.
Indeed, and I've never argued against the idea.
So you're just a lying hypocrite then exactly as I said.
Jesus wept...
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego
is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did originally.
Go back to sleep dumbarse.
On 20/01/2026 10:09 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:You and your mates are always banging on about proof, but your light on
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became
*moderated* forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
Hey Detective Richo! Would it be 'hypocritical' to only interrogate
one gang in a gang war?
for it when it is asked of you.
That is commonly known as hypocrisy.
On 20/01/2026 4:18 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:12 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 1:39 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:40 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 10:41 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 18/01/2026 5:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
He is the only thing that you're capable of talking about,We aren't talking about him, try and keep up.
You might not be - but we are!
anything else and you're totally out of your depth.
You have to wonder what goes on in their fucked up heads if all
they want to do around here is talk about me day after day.
So you should be left to bullshit your brains out, tell lies about
others and falsely attribute claims to other people without
pushback, is that it?
Even if that nonsense were true,
It is true. Proven so countless times.
what the *fuck* does it have to do with
you? This is an unmoderated newsgroup, and much to your obvious
displeasure no one went on holiday and left you in charge.
"This is an unmoderated newsgroup"
If you don't like having your glass jaw broken nobody is stopping you
from leaving.
You need to get the fuck over yourself, Junior. No one needs your
permission to post around here :)
"what the *fuck* does it have to do with
˙˙you?"
he farted out moments earlier.
I don't need *your* permission to post here, son.
"This is an unmoderated newsgroup"
Remember, you dumb cunt?
<snip white noise in protest>
Touched a nerve, did I clogwog? :)
On 20/01/2026 10:01 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:You guy never come up with anything original, so why should put effort
On 20/01/2026 9:39 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is >>>>>>> lying."
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about
yourself is bullshit given that you have never proven a single bit >>>>>> of it.
It's keith's quote, stupid.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you? >>>>>>
It's keith's porridge being fed back to him, stupid.
Buffo will be along soon to admit that he erred.
Why don't you chatter among yourselves girls noone else can be bothered
Can't you use AI or something to come up with something original? (You
can continue with the inaccuracies till the AI gets sorted)
into doing so?
On 20/01/2026 5:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:14 pm, keithr0 wrote:N
On 20/01/2026 9:39 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is >>>>>>> lying."
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about
yourself is bullshit given that you have never proven a single bit >>>>>> of it.
It's keith's quote, stupid.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you? >>>>>>
It's keith's porridge being fed back to him, stupid.
Buffo will be along soon to admit that he erred.
Why don't you chatter among yourselves girls noone else can be bothered
Running away because you know you're done, again, as always.
On 20/01/2026 9:52 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 4:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums. >>>>>> It's because of people like him that that they all became
*moderated* forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on
about proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
What for since you don't even have the integrity to consider the
proof and respond to it an adult manner?
I posted verifiable proof that backed up exactly what I had said and
proved you 100% wrong and all you did was snip and deny it and just
powered on with your lies because your ego is so fragile that you
can't admit you were wrong.
What the fuck are you wittering about?
You have forgotten already you demented old fool?
You wouldn't know verifiable proof if it smacked you round your head.
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 1:23 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 8:59 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 11:06 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:45 pm, Noddy wrote:
Feel free to prove all that, Running Man.
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove your claims.
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*,
That's not what you have claimed in the past, you definitely placed
that onus on the claimants.
It's clear English isn't your bag :)
I've placed no such "onus" on anyone, and I invite you to cite any
example where I have done so.
Jaysus fookin' Christ!!!
That's one of your most outrageous lies *ever* Fraudster. I've posted
those quotes of yours so often that they're all worn and faded.
Your position is that everyone should prove their claims or be
thought of as a bullshit artist *except* when it comes to your
claims. Oh no, everyone should just accept those as fact.
No, that's your spin. I've never said anything of the kind,
Arrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh! Again you frothing loon, proof of your gigantic hypocrisy of this has been posted more times than Xmas cards were circa 1985.
Theree is no point in reading the rest. He's finally lost his marbles,
plot and contact with Reality.
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:20 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:Another irrelevant smoke screen to cover up your inability to answer
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
On 19-Jan-26 11:13 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenged you to prove that you could.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keithr0 wrote:When did you ask?
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the company called us.On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some interesting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff with an independent motor per wheel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No problem, it's in the hands of programmers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not mechanics :)https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first- electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with-one- motor- per- wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can just imagine the mess it would cause >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code as an example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for some GPS thing or something claiming that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modify if required and upload it. arduino programmed - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simple. That proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enable agreed.
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> program an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that claimed to be sooper speshal programmer because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you did it from scratch or some bullshit like that in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of your typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But when you were asked to provide some proof of your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> superior programming abilities what did keith do? Well >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he ran away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even comprehend my response so instead you just keep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying and evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes to the crunch you run away with your tail between >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - >>>>>>>>>>>>> but when asked to produce some of your code that you >>>>>>>>>>>>> claimed you wrote from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, >>>>>>>>>>>>> you are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" >>>>>>>>>>>> includes you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran >>>>>>>>>>>> away screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made >>>>>>>>>>> that claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's >>>>>>>>>>> such a simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a >>>>>>>>>>> demented circular argument just as you did last time your >>>>>>>>>>> fool nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words >>>>>>>>>>> from your cult leader whom backed up what I had been saying >>>>>>>>>>> on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", >>>>>>>>>>> and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from >>>>>>>>>>> which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be >>>>>>>>>>> easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious >>>>>>>>>>> question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a >>>>>>>>>>> contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you >>>>>>>>>>> consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and >>>>>>>>>>> you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit". >>>>>>>>>>>
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here >>>>>>>>>>> is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more >>>>>>>>>>> conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that >>>>>>>>> claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a >>>>>>>>> simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a
demented circular argument just as you did last time your fool >>>>>>>>> nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words from >>>>>>>>> your cult leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the >>>>>>>>> topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", >>>>>>>>> and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which >>>>>>>>> people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily >>>>>>>>> tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious
question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a
contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you >>>>>>>>> consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you >>>>>>>>> are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here >>>>>>>>> is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more >>>>>>>>> conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when you >>>>>>>> were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Fortunately for me your deception and lies are on record.
I *never* claimed to be a programmer and your attempted lies and >>>>>>> deception won't hide the fact you ran off when challenged to
produce an example of your programming skills. End of story.
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz I >>>>>>>> won't be listening.
And there is the sound of keith doing a runner as per usual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish >>>>>> imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes >>>>> him.
Keep running keith. Careful you don't trip over your cooked drunken
slob mate on your way out...
a simple question.
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
Another
On 20/01/2026 5:18 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:18 am, Xeno wrote:
There is no "onus" on anyone to prove *anything*, you stupid clog
Then you clearly do not understand the concept of responsibility.
˙˙if you make a claim, in particular an affirmative assertion or one
that challenges the status quo, the onus (burden of proof) is upon
you to substantiate it if asked. This principle, rooted in logic and
debate, dictates that the person asserting a proposition *must*
provide sufficient evidence to support it, rather than requiring
others to disprove it.
The person making a claim (the proponent) bears the responsibility of
providing evidence, often summarized by the Latin maxim onus probandi
incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat ("the burden of proof lies
with the one who speaks, not the one who denies").
Hitchens' Razor is the principle, credited to writer Christopher
Hitchens, that "what can be asserted without evidence can also be
dismissed without evidence," meaning the burden of proof lies with
the person making the claim, and unsupported assertions can be
rejected without needing counter-evidence. It's a tool for critical
thinking, applying the concept of skepticism to unfounded claims,
especially in debates about religion or extraordinary ideas, by
demanding proof from those who propose them.
xeno trying to sound professorial, and only proving that anybody can
google.
And be completely irrelevant in doing so.
Not one word of his cut and pasted rambling does anything to suggest
that there is an "onus" on *anyone* to prove anything to anyone else in
an informal, unmoderated discussion group like this. This is *not* a
court of law, and there is no obligation on anyone to do a thing. The
choice of whether or not to believe lies with the listener, and
regardless of whatever choice they make no one else has an obligation to satisfy them just because they may not like what they hear.
There is no concept of responsibility to be applied here, and there most certainly does *not* need to be the display of hypocrisy we see here
that comes from the person who has made more unfounded claims in this
group than every other poster combined :)
On 20/01/2026 7:47 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 20/1/2026 8:18 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:18 pm, keithr0 wrote:Beg to differ! When you make a claim to be trade qualified, you are
On 20/01/2026 8:18 am, Xeno wrote:
And be completely irrelevant in doing so.
Not one word of his cut and pasted rambling does anything to suggest
that there is an "onus" on *anyone* to prove anything to anyone else
in an informal, unmoderated discussion group like this. This is *not*
a court of law, and there is no obligation on anyone to do a thing.
The choice of whether or not to believe lies with the listener, and
regardless of whatever choice they make no one else has an obligation
to satisfy them just because they may not like what they hear.
There is no concept of responsibility to be applied here, and there most >>
*legally obligated* to provide proof of said claim if contested.
Perhaps you could point out the relevant legislation.
When you make a claim to be trade qualified, but are indeed *not*
qualified at all, you are committing *fraud* and, for, such there are
legal consequences. You also claimed membership of the VACC. Doing so
whilst not ever being a member is *also fraud*.
Definition of fraud - wrongful or criminal deception intended to result
in financial or personal gain.
Him attempting to dictate to anyone about providing support for claims
is the height of hypocrisy :)
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to pay
of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you insisted
it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on you to prove
your claim and you have an obligation to do so. However despite your
claims you never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond to demands
or threats.
On 20/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish
imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes
him.
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego
is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did originally.
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo,
you are all caught up in your own self righteousness.
On 20/01/2026 10:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego
is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did originally.
Whatever I may or may not have said about Keith in the past is
completely irrelevant as far as me talking about you is concerned, so
you can spare us the pathetic goalpost shifting.
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:20 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:Another irrelevant smoke screen to cover up your inability to answer a
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
On 19-Jan-26 11:13 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenged you to prove that you could.
On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote:When did you ask?
keithr0 wrote:
On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional programmer or "Software engineer" as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the company called us.On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some interesting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff with an independent motor per wheel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No problem, it's in the hands of programmers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not mechanics :)https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first- electric- m- car- is- coming-in-2027- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with-one- motor- per- wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can just imagine the mess it would cause >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call themselves >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code as an example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some GPS thing or something claiming that you were a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, modify if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required and upload it. arduino programmed - simple. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you enable agreed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> program an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that claimed to be sooper speshal programmer because you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did it from scratch or some bullshit like that in one of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. But when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you were asked to provide some proof of your superior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programming abilities what did keith do? Well he ran >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't even >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehend my response so instead you just keep lying and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes to the crunch you run away with your tail between >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular.
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the >>>>>>>>>>>>> distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar.
I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were - >>>>>>>>>>>> but when asked to produce some of your code that you claimed >>>>>>>>>>>> you wrote from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, >>>>>>>>>>>> you are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" >>>>>>>>>>> includes you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran away >>>>>>>>>>> screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that >>>>>>>>>> claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a >>>>>>>>>> simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a
demented circular argument just as you did last time your fool >>>>>>>>>> nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words from >>>>>>>>>> your cult leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the >>>>>>>>>> topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", >>>>>>>>>> and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which >>>>>>>>>> people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be >>>>>>>>>> easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious
question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a
contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you >>>>>>>>>> consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and >>>>>>>>>> you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit". >>>>>>>>>>
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here >>>>>>>>>> is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more >>>>>>>>>> conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that >>>>>>>> claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a
simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a
demented circular argument just as you did last time your fool >>>>>>>> nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words from >>>>>>>> your cult leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the >>>>>>>> topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", and >>>>>>>> given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which >>>>>>>> people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be easily >>>>>>>> tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious
question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a
contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you
consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and you are >>>>>>>> definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit".
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here is >>>>>>>> to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more >>>>>>>> conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when you >>>>>>> were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Fortunately for me your deception and lies are on record.
I *never* claimed to be a programmer and your attempted lies and
deception won't hide the fact you ran off when challenged to
produce an example of your programming skills. End of story.
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz I >>>>>>> won't be listening.
And there is the sound of keith doing a runner as per usual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish
imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes
him.
Keep running keith. Careful you don't trip over your cooked drunken
slob mate on your way out...
simple question.
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish
imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes him.
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego
is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did originally.
On 20/01/2026 8:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:52 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 4:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car
forums. It's because of people like him that that they all became >>>>>>> *moderated* forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on
about proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
What for since you don't even have the integrity to consider the
proof and respond to it an adult manner?
I posted verifiable proof that backed up exactly what I had said
and proved you 100% wrong and all you did was snip and deny it and
just powered on with your lies because your ego is so fragile that
you can't admit you were wrong.
What the fuck are you wittering about?
You have forgotten already you demented old fool?
You wouldn't know verifiable proof if it smacked you round your head.
You're proved that when presented you either can't comprehend it or you stubbornly deny it. So are you demented or just a stubborn dishonest egotistical prick?
On 20/01/2026 5:23 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:57 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:31 pm, Noddy wrote:
I've placed no such "onus" on anyone,
FFS you have been quoted countless times suggesting those making the
claims get to prove them.
Indeed, and I've never argued against the idea.
So you're just a lying hypocrite then exactly as I said.
Jesus wept...
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to pay
of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on
you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so. However
despite your claims you never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond to
demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
On 20/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish
imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes
him.
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego
is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did originally.
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo, you
are all caught up in your own self righteousness.
Go back to sleep dumbarse.
On 20/01/2026 10:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego
is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did originally.
Whatever I may or may not have said about Keith in the past is
completely irrelevant
you can spare us the pathetic goalpost shifting.
Go back to sleep dumbarse.
Go fuck yourself you stupid Dutch cunt.
Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
One of them is a bad option. Any Tom, Dick or Keith could cut'n'paste
from a zillion sites and claim it as theirs.
On 21/01/2026 5:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to
pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on
you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so. However
despite your claims you never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
I'm more interested in why would I have to prove a statement he made up
in the first place.
It's not my problem that he has comprehension issues and is a habitual
liar.
On 21/01/2026 5:04 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
One of them is a bad option. Any Tom, Dick or Keith could cut'n'paste
from a zillion sites and claim it as theirs.
Likely what he did in the first place, like everyone else who programs
an Arduino with existing libraries and code examples that can easily be modified to suit a particular project as I had described. He just can't admit to having done exactly that because he claimed to be a more
'sooper speshal much betterer' programmer than anyone else.
If he posted his code it should be relatively easy to verify and of
course he realised this so he ran away with his tail between his legs.
On 21/01/2026 5:04 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
One of them is a bad option. Any Tom, Dick or Keith could cut'n'paste
from a zillion sites and claim it as theirs.
Likely what he did in the first place, like everyone else who programs
an Arduino with existing libraries and code examples that can easily be modified to suit a particular project as I had described. He just can't admit to having done exactly that because he claimed to be a more
'sooper speshal much betterer' programmer than anyone else.
If he posted his code it should be relatively easy to verify and of
course he realised this so he ran away with his tail between his legs.
On 20/01/2026 8:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish >>>>>> imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes >>>>> him.
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego
is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did
originally.
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo,
you are all caught up in your own self righteousness.
That's laughably incorrect. But answer me this dipshit, you insist I
should have spoken English at age 9 yet *all* the evidence presented
backs up why that was not the case in the 70's - not until 1985 and only then in upper primary - so you were clearly 100% wrong.
So, instead of accepting the evidence that as late as the 90's there
were not even 40 primary schools out of 1700 odd teaching English at the start of primary school *from the Dutch education department itself* you still insist I should have spoken English at year 9 Mr. "Self-righteous"?
If you're just going to ignore all the evidence from every verifiable
source and my personal experience which is backed up by that very
evidence and stick with your own version of anecdotal bullshit, why
should anyone take you seriously?
Your ego is so massive that it won't allow you to say "oops I was wrong"
to the point where you would rather destroy any integrity you might have
had rather than admit you fucked up.
You (and your tag-along clueless gimp) were proven 100% wrong...
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to pay
of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on
you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so. However
despite your claims you never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:09 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:You and your mates are always banging on about proof, but your light
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became
*moderated* forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on
about proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
Hey Detective Richo! Would it be 'hypocritical' to only interrogate
one gang in a gang war?
on for it when it is asked of you.
Really? Could you cite me for when I've refused to supply "proof"?
That is commonly known as hypocrisy.
Not until it's proven it's not.
Anyhoo, you failed to answer my question. (Gasp! Shock horror!)
On 20/01/2026 8:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:52 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 4:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car
forums. It's because of people like him that that they all became >>>>>>> *moderated* forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on
about proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
What for since you don't even have the integrity to consider the
proof and respond to it an adult manner?
I posted verifiable proof that backed up exactly what I had said
and proved you 100% wrong and all you did was snip and deny it and
just powered on with your lies because your ego is so fragile that
you can't admit you were wrong.
What the fuck are you wittering about?
You have forgotten already you demented old fool?
You wouldn't know verifiable proof if it smacked you round your head.
You're proved that when presented you either can't comprehend it or you stubbornly deny it. So are you demented or just a stubborn dishonest egotistical prick?
On 20/01/2026 8:06 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:01 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:You guy never come up with anything original, so why should put effort
On 20/01/2026 9:39 am, alvey wrote:Can't you use AI or something to come up with something original?
Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is >>>>>>>> lying."
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about >>>>>>> yourself is bullshit given that you have never proven a single
bit of it.
It's keith's quote, stupid.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you? >>>>>>>
It's keith's porridge being fed back to him, stupid.
Buffo will be along soon to admit that he erred.
Why don't you chatter among yourselves girls noone else can be bothered >>>
(You can continue with the inaccuracies till the AI gets sorted)
into doing so?
You can't. You're one step away from playing with your own shit you
deluded old man.
On 20/01/2026 6:28 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:14 pm, keithr0 wrote:N
On 20/01/2026 9:39 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:43 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:53 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:56 pm, keithr0 wrote:
I worked for
So you claim.
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is >>>>>>>> lying."
Remember?
I see. So, by that logic everything you have ever claimed about >>>>>>> yourself is bullshit given that you have never proven a single
bit of it.
It's keith's quote, stupid.
See how stupid you look when your own porridge is fed back to you? >>>>>>>
It's keith's porridge being fed back to him, stupid.
Buffo will be along soon to admit that he erred.
Why don't you chatter among yourselves girls noone else can be bothered >>>
Running away because you know you're done, again, as always.
Keep running keith...
keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:55 pm, alvey wrote:
Not utter bullshit at all Fraudster. I can name posters who left
specifically because of you. Who can you name?
OK then name them, along with how you know why they left.
John_H, felix & Fred to name three. Respectively, because he busted Fraudster lying plus his obsession with attacking Xeno, Fred and felix
both tired of Fraudsters antics and cretinous abuse and said so.
Now, if you haven't got anything useful to contribute I'd suggest that
you find something else to do. Jigsaws perhaps?
On 20/01/2026 8:12 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:Another
On 20/01/2026 5:20 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:Another irrelevant smoke screen to cover up your inability to answer
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
On 19-Jan-26 11:13 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote:I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modify if required and upload it. arduino programmed - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simple. That proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enable agreed.
On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keithr0 wrote:Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I challenged you to prove that you could. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
When did you ask?On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a professional programmer or "Software engineer" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the company called us.On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some interesting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff with an independent motor per wheel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No problem, it's in the hands of programmers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not mechanics :)https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first- electric- m- car- is- coming- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in-2027- with-one- motor- per- wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can just imagine the mess it would cause >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it fucks up :)
That's *is* the problem.
Not surprising when any witless, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unqualified fool, like you, can call >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves a "programmer".
Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What language?
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code as an example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for some GPS thing or something claiming that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> program an Arduino and that is a fact - it was *you* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that claimed to be sooper speshal programmer because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you did it from scratch or some bullshit like that in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of your typical hyper-inflated egotistical wanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But when you were asked to provide some proof of your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> superior programming abilities what did keith do? Well >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he ran away of course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even comprehend my response so instead you just keep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying and evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious why >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and when it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes to the crunch you run away with your tail between >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - but when asked to produce some of your code that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> claimed you wrote from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably "Anybody" >>>>>>>>>>>>> includes you, but when you were put on the spot, you ran >>>>>>>>>>>>> away screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made >>>>>>>>>>>> that claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's >>>>>>>>>>>> such a simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a >>>>>>>>>>>> demented circular argument just as you did last time your >>>>>>>>>>>> fool nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the >>>>>>>>>>>> words from your cult leader whom backed up what I had been >>>>>>>>>>>> saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy >>>>>>>>>>>> posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", >>>>>>>>>>>> and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from >>>>>>>>>>>> which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be >>>>>>>>>>>> easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>> question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a >>>>>>>>>>>> contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you >>>>>>>>>>>> consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and >>>>>>>>>>>> you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit". >>>>>>>>>>>>
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving >>>>>>>>>>>> here is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any >>>>>>>>>>>> more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made that >>>>>>>>>> claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's such a >>>>>>>>>> simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a
demented circular argument just as you did last time your fool >>>>>>>>>> nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words from >>>>>>>>>> your cult leader whom backed up what I had been saying on the >>>>>>>>>> topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", >>>>>>>>>> and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from which >>>>>>>>>> people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be >>>>>>>>>> easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious
question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a
contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you >>>>>>>>>> consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and >>>>>>>>>> you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit". >>>>>>>>>>
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here >>>>>>>>>> is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more >>>>>>>>>> conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when you >>>>>>>>> were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Fortunately for me your deception and lies are on record.
I *never* claimed to be a programmer and your attempted lies and >>>>>>>> deception won't hide the fact you ran off when challenged to
produce an example of your programming skills. End of story.
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz >>>>>>>>> I won't be listening.
And there is the sound of keith doing a runner as per usual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you
childish imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody"
includes him.
Keep running keith. Careful you don't trip over your cooked drunken >>>>> slob mate on your way out...
a simple question.
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
Nope, provide a programming example Mr. "Programmer" or keep running.
Those are your options.
keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond to
demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish >>>>>> imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes >>>>> him.
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego
is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did
originally.
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo,
Wrong. Badly. But still hilarious.
you are all caught up in your own self righteousne
Wrong again. By exactly 180 degrees.
On 20/01/2026 8:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you childish >>>>>> imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody" includes >>>>> him.
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego
is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did
originally.
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo,
you are all caught up in your own self righteousness.
That's laughably incorrect. But answer me this dipshit, you insist I
should have spoken English at age 9 yet *all* the evidence presented
backs up why that was not the case in the 70's - not until 1985 and only then in upper primary - so you were clearly 100% wrong.
So, instead of accepting the evidence that as late as the 90's there
were not even 40 primary schools out of 1700 odd teaching English at the start of primary school *from the Dutch education department itself* you still insist I should have spoken English at year 9 Mr. "Self-righteous"?
If you're just going to ignore all the evidence from every verifiable
source and my personal experience which is backed up by that very
evidence and stick with your own version of anecdotal bullshit, why
should anyone take you seriously?
Your ego is so massive that it won't allow you to say "oops I was wrong"
to the point where you would rather destroy any integrity you might have
had rather than admit you fucked up.
You (and your tag-along clueless gimp) were proven 100% wrong...
Go back to sleep dumbarse.
Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you
childish imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody"
includes him.
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his
ego is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did
originally.
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo,
you are all caught up in your own self righteousness.
That's laughably incorrect. But answer me this dipshit, you insist I
should have spoken English at age 9 yet *all* the evidence presented
backs up why that was not the case in the 70's - not until 1985 and
only then in upper primary - so you were clearly 100% wrong.
So, instead of accepting the evidence that as late as the 90's there
were not even 40 primary schools out of 1700 odd teaching English at
the start of primary school *from the Dutch education department
itself* you still insist I should have spoken English at year 9 Mr.
"Self-righteous"?
If you're just going to ignore all the evidence from every verifiable
source and my personal experience which is backed up by that very
evidence and stick with your own version of anecdotal bullshit, why
should anyone take you seriously?
Your ego is so massive that it won't allow you to say "oops I was
wrong" to the point where you would rather destroy any integrity you
might have had rather than admit you fucked up.
You (and your tag-along clueless gimp) were proven 100% wrong...
Frankly m'dear, it's astonishing that Fraudster & Ritcho accuse anyone
else of having an outsized ego. It's like Trump accusing someone of
being a power-crazed and egomaniacal lunatic.
Clocky wrote:
On 21/01/2026 5:04 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
One of them is a bad option. Any Tom, Dick or Keith could cut'n'paste
from a zillion sites and claim it as theirs.
Likely what he did in the first place, like everyone else who programs
an Arduino with existing libraries and code examples that can easily
be modified to suit a particular project as I had described. He just
can't admit to having done exactly that because he claimed to be a
more 'sooper speshal much betterer' programmer than anyone else.
Yeah well I have my doubts about those claims.
If he posted his code it should be relatively easy to verify and of
course he realised this so he ran away with his tail between his legs.
It's a tad early to make that call, but one can always hope...
On 20/01/2026 8:49 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his ego
is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did
originally.
Whatever I may or may not have said about Keith in the past is
completely irrelevant
It's 100% relevant to the conversation. You did a complete 180 in your
fit of red rage.
˙as far as me talking about you is concerned, so
you can spare us the pathetic goalpost shifting.
You flipped your script in your red rant because you forgot you
originally leveled those criticism at keith, not me you profoundly
stupid man.
Go back to sleep dumbarse.
Go fuck yourself you stupid Dutch cunt.
Go back to sleep dumbarse.
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back when you
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond to
demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
can ask politely.
On 21/01/2026 1:00 am, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:12 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:Another
On 20/01/2026 5:20 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:Another irrelevant smoke screen to cover up your inability to
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
On 19-Jan-26 11:13 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keithr0 wrote:I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modify if required and upload it. arduino programmed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - simple. That proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enable agreed.
Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I challenged you to prove that you could. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>When did you ask?On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:What language?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a professional programmer or "Software >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineer" as the company called us. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting stuff with an independent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motor per wheel.Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No problem, it's in the hands of programmers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not mechanics :)You can just imagine the mess it would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/bmws- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first- electric- m- car- is- coming- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in-2027- with-one- motor- per- wheel/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Not surprising when any witless, illogical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and unqualified fool, like you, can call >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code as an example when asked.
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for some GPS thing or something claiming that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can program an Arduino and that is a fact - it was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *you* that claimed to be sooper speshal programmer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because you did it from scratch or some bullshit like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in one of your typical hyper-inflated >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> egotistical wanks. But when you were asked to provide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some proof of your superior programming abilities >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what did keith do? Well he ran away of course, as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even comprehend my response so instead you just keep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying and evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why that is JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when it comes to the crunch you run away with your tail >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - but when asked to produce some of your code that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claimed you wrote from scratch you ran away.
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unproven, you are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Anybody" includes you, but when you were put on the spot, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you ran away screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made >>>>>>>>>>>>> that claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's >>>>>>>>>>>>> such a simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a >>>>>>>>>>>>> demented circular argument just as you did last time your >>>>>>>>>>>>> fool nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the >>>>>>>>>>>>> words from your cult leader whom backed up what I had been >>>>>>>>>>>>> saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy >>>>>>>>>>>>> posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from
scratch", and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from >>>>>>>>>>>>> which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be >>>>>>>>>>>>> easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>> question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a >>>>>>>>>>>>> contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that >>>>>>>>>>>>> you consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit". >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving >>>>>>>>>>>>> here is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any >>>>>>>>>>>>> more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made >>>>>>>>>>> that claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's >>>>>>>>>>> such a simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a >>>>>>>>>>> demented circular argument just as you did last time your >>>>>>>>>>> fool nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the words >>>>>>>>>>> from your cult leader whom backed up what I had been saying >>>>>>>>>>> on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy posted; >>>>>>>>>>>
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", >>>>>>>>>>> and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from >>>>>>>>>>> which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be >>>>>>>>>>> easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious >>>>>>>>>>> question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a >>>>>>>>>>> contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you >>>>>>>>>>> consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and >>>>>>>>>>> you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit". >>>>>>>>>>>
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving here >>>>>>>>>>> is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any more >>>>>>>>>>> conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when >>>>>>>>>> you were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Fortunately for me your deception and lies are on record.
I *never* claimed to be a programmer and your attempted lies >>>>>>>>> and deception won't hide the fact you ran off when challenged >>>>>>>>> to produce an example of your programming skills. End of story. >>>>>>>>>
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, coz >>>>>>>>>> I won't be listening.
And there is the sound of keith doing a runner as per usual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you
childish imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody"
includes him.
Keep running keith. Careful you don't trip over your cooked
drunken slob mate on your way out...
answer a simple question.
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
Nope, provide a programming example Mr. "Programmer" or keep running.
Those are your options.
ROTFL, you really are a very arrogant little person aren't you?
On 21/01/2026 2:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:49 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his
ego is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did
originally.
Whatever I may or may not have said about Keith in the past is
completely irrelevant
It's 100% relevant to the conversation. You did a complete 180 in your
fit of red rage.
˙˙as far as me talking about you is concerned, so
you can spare us the pathetic goalpost shifting.
You flipped your script in your red rant because you forgot you
originally leveled those criticism at keith, not me you profoundly
stupid man.
Go back to sleep dumbarse.
Go fuck yourself you stupid Dutch cunt.
Go back to sleep dumbarse.
"Red rage" congratulations that's the first new thing that you've come
up with in years.
On 21/01/2026 7:11 am, alvey wrote:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:49 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 5:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon.
Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you
childish imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody"
includes him.
That's the least of this problems. His biggest issue is that his
ego is not supported by his character.
If you actually weren't such a dumbarse and you were consistent with
your opinions you would be saying that about keith as you did
originally.
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo,
Wrong. Badly. But still hilarious.
you are all caught up in your own self righteousne
ss.
Wrong again. By exactly 180 degrees.
Obviously you have a huge ego, together with lots of denial, there is probably a psychiatric treatment for your condition. You should take it
post haste.
On 20/01/2026 10:44 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So, what proof have you that that is the reason that they left?
On 20/01/2026 9:55 pm, alvey wrote:
Not utter bullshit at all Fraudster. I can name posters who left
specifically because of you. Who can you name?
OK then name them, along with how you know why they left.
John_H, felix & Fred to name three. Respectively, because he busted
Fraudster lying plus his obsession with attacking Xeno, Fred and felix
both tired of Fraudsters antics and cretinous abuse and said so.
Now, if you haven't got anything useful to contribute I'd suggest that
you find something else to do. Jigsaws perhaps?
On 21/01/2026 5:00 am, alvey wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to
pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on
you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so. However
despite your claims you never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
I'm more interested in why would I have to prove a statement he made up
in the first place.
It's not my problem that he has comprehension issues and is a habitual
liar.
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to
pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on
you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so. However
despite your claims you never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have demanded.
On 20/01/2026 8:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo,
you are all caught up in your own self righteousness.
That's laughably incorrect. But answer me this dipshit, you insist I
should have spoken English at age 9 yet *all* the evidence presented
backs up why that was not the case in the 70's - not until 1985 and only then in upper primary - so you were clearly 100% wrong.
On 20/01/2026 8:49 pm, Noddy wrote:
Whatever I may or may not have said about Keith in the past is
completely irrelevant
It's 100% relevant to the conversation. You did a complete 180 in your
fit of red rage.
˙as far as me talking about you is concerned, so
you can spare us the pathetic goalpost shifting.
On 21/01/2026 5:12 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:44 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So, what proof have you that that is the reason that they left?
On 20/01/2026 9:55 pm, alvey wrote:
Not utter bullshit at all Fraudster. I can name posters who left
specifically because of you. Who can you name?
OK then name them, along with how you know why they left.
John_H, felix & Fred to name three. Respectively, because he busted
Fraudster lying plus his obsession with attacking Xeno, Fred and
felix both tired of Fraudsters antics and cretinous abuse and said so.
Now, if you haven't got anything useful to contribute I'd suggest
that you find something else to do. Jigsaws perhaps?
None, and he's talking utter nonsense if he thinks I'm responsible.
John_H couldn't have given a flying fuck about anything I had to say,
Felix left for the 19th time after making a total fuckwit of himself for
the 19th time, and for all anyone knows about Fred is he snuffed it.
If there's been anyone who's done more damage here than anyone else it's that fucking mental case ex teacher, but his two loyal arse lickers will never accept that.
On 20/01/2026 7:22 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 20/1/2026 5:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums.
It's because of people like him that that they all became
*moderated* forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on about
proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
Yeah, Darren's own words that he doesn't post on other forums.
That doesn't mean he's been "expelled", shit-fer-brains.
˙I know
why, he's a forum poisoner.
I seem to remember you fucked 7 threads in 7 days here, and also had a
hand in 3 of the last 5?
You gold plated liar and hypocrite...
On 21/1/2026 6:30 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 21/01/2026 5:12 pm, keithr0 wrote:Aw gee, and all we did was expose you for the liar you are.
On 20/01/2026 10:44 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So, what proof have you that that is the reason that they left?
On 20/01/2026 9:55 pm, alvey wrote:
Not utter bullshit at all Fraudster. I can name posters who left
specifically because of you. Who can you name?
OK then name them, along with how you know why they left.
John_H, felix & Fred to name three. Respectively, because he busted
Fraudster lying plus his obsession with attacking Xeno, Fred and
felix both tired of Fraudsters antics and cretinous abuse and said so. >>>>
Now, if you haven't got anything useful to contribute I'd suggest
that you find something else to do. Jigsaws perhaps?
None, and he's talking utter nonsense if he thinks I'm responsible.
John_H couldn't have given a flying fuck about anything I had to say,
Felix left for the 19th time after making a total fuckwit of himself
for the 19th time, and for all anyone knows about Fred is he snuffed it.
If there's been anyone who's done more damage here than anyone else
it's that fucking mental case ex teacher, but his two loyal arse
lickers will never accept that.
On 21/01/2026 2:18 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 1:00 am, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:12 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:Another
On 20/01/2026 5:20 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 2:34 pm, keithr0 wrote:Another irrelevant smoke screen to cover up your inability to
On 20/01/2026 9:42 am, jonz wrote:
On 19-Jan-26 11:13 PM, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 6:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On 19/01/2026 5:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 2:48 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 12:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 19/01/2026 7:46 am, keithr0 wrote:
On 19/01/2026 3:40 am, Clocky wrote:
On 18/01/2026 3:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 17/01/2026 9:44 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 6:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:You said anybody could do it,
On 17/01/2026 8:00 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 17/01/2026 12:38 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16/01/2026 10:07 pm, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16/01/2026 5:54 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16/01/2026 6:00 pm, Clocky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2026 4:10 pm, alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keithr0 wrote:
I said anyone can program an Arduino you lying prick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and anyone can program an Arduino. Take some code, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modify if required and upload it. arduino programmed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - simple. That proves nothing. Even that fuckwit you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enable agreed.Cite? You were claiming that anybody could do it, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I challenged you to prove that you could. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>When did you ask?On 15/01/2026 12:16 pm, alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:What language?
For the last 15 years of my career, I worked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a professional programmer or "Software >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineer" as the company called us. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 15/01/2026 6:35 am, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:48 pm, Noddy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/01/2026 10:31 pm, keithr0 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suppose that they could do some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting stuff with an independent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motor per wheel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Pardon? I don't recall Richo claiming to be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "programmer". What was the actual claim? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No problem, it's in the hands of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programmers not mechanics :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bmws- first- electric- m- car- is- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming- in-2027- with-one- motor- per- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wheel/
You can just imagine the mess it would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause if it fucks up :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's *is* the problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Not surprising when any witless, illogical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and unqualified fool, like you, can call >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves a "programmer". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bullshit+ by the looks of it.
You'll note he's never provided a single line of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code as an example when asked. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
When you were crapping on about how you wrote code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for some GPS thing or something claiming that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were a "real" programmer.
I asked for the code and you ran away, as per usual. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You left skid marks for a hundred metres down the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> road in your haste to leave.
I never claimed to be a programmer - I said anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can program an Arduino and that is a fact - it was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *you* that claimed to be sooper speshal programmer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because you did it from scratch or some bullshit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like that in one of your typical hyper-inflated >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> egotistical wanks. But when you were asked to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide some proof of your superior programming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abilities what did keith do? Well he ran away of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> course, as always.
My we are an angry person aren't we?
Facts made you look dishonest and evidently you can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even comprehend my response so instead you just keep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying and evading.
Still no code though and I think it's pretty obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why that is JD Richo... you're all piss and wind and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when it comes to the crunch you run away with your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tail between your legs. Always.
Of course they can. That's why they are so popular. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
˙˙but, when put on the spot, you couldn't
and out-accelerated an F1 car as you disappeared into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the distance demonstrating that you are a cowardly liar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I wasn't the one calling myself a "programmer" - you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were - but when asked to produce some of your code that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you claimed you wrote from scratch you ran away. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unproven, you are lying.
You asserted that anybody could do it. Presumably >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Anybody" includes you, but when you were put on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spot, you ran away screaming.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> demented circular argument just as you did last time your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fool nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> words from your cult leader whom backed up what I had been >>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> scratch", and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>>>> question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving >>>>>>>>>>>>>> here is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
There you go "fruitcake".
Lots of words, no relevance.
100% relevant.
You asserted that anybody could do it.
Yep. Fact.
You call yourself a programmer, not me. I have never made >>>>>>>>>>>> that claim, but I've certainly programmed Arduinos. That's >>>>>>>>>>>> such a simple process anyone *can* do it.
Since you won't listen to me and insist on engaging in a >>>>>>>>>>>> demented circular argument just as you did last time your >>>>>>>>>>>> fool nose was rubbed through your own shit here are the >>>>>>>>>>>> words from your cult leader whom backed up what I had been >>>>>>>>>>>> saying on the topic.
On April 7th 2022 in the thread "O.T. A challenge" Noddy >>>>>>>>>>>> posted;
"No one said anything about "making something from scratch", >>>>>>>>>>>> and given
that there are a libraries full of pre-written code from >>>>>>>>>>>> which people
can pick and choose the routines they need that can then be >>>>>>>>>>>> easily
tailored to suit their specific requirements the obvious >>>>>>>>>>>> question has to
be "Why the hell would you *need* to?"
Can I give you some free advice?
As much as you're trying to make it one, this is *not* a >>>>>>>>>>>> contest. You're
not going to win a trophy for having done something that you >>>>>>>>>>>> consider to
be more complicated or important than anyone else here, and >>>>>>>>>>>> you are
definitely *not* the only person here who has "done shit". >>>>>>>>>>>>
Carry on about it all you like, but all you're achieving >>>>>>>>>>>> here is to make
yourself look like a total fruitcake who couldn't be any >>>>>>>>>>>> more conceited
if he *wanted* to be."
Unfortunately for you, what you said is on record, and when >>>>>>>>>>> you were put on the spot, you ran away screaming.
Fortunately for me your deception and lies are on record.
I *never* claimed to be a programmer and your attempted lies >>>>>>>>>> and deception won't hide the fact you ran off when challenged >>>>>>>>>> to produce an example of your programming skills. End of story. >>>>>>>>>>
End of story, cry all you like, it won't get you anywhere, >>>>>>>>>>> coz I won't be listening.
And there is the sound of keith doing a runner as per usual. >>>>>>>>>
˙˙He`s just had enough of yer nonsensical rants I`d reckon. >>>>>>>>> Surprised that he tolerated you for as long as he did you
childish imbecile..
Clocky has problems with the simple concept that "Anybody"
includes him.
Keep running keith. Careful you don't trip over your cooked
drunken slob mate on your way out...
answer a simple question.
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
Nope, provide a programming example Mr. "Programmer" or keep running.
Those are your options.
ROTFL, you really are a very arrogant little person aren't you?
You made the claim to be the superior programmer around here, you get to prove it running man.
On 21/01/2026 1:30 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 21/01/2026 5:04 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
One of them is a bad option. Any Tom, Dick or Keith could
cut'n'paste from a zillion sites and claim it as theirs.
Likely what he did in the first place, like everyone else who
programs an Arduino with existing libraries and code examples that
can easily be modified to suit a particular project as I had
described. He just can't admit to having done exactly that because he
claimed to be a more 'sooper speshal much betterer' programmer than
anyone else.
Yeah well I have my doubts about those claims.
If he posted his code it should be relatively easy to verify and of
course he realised this so he ran away with his tail between his legs.
It's a tad early to make that call, but one can always hope...
Well he might, but it should a no-brainer to determine if his code
compiles and what libraries it uses if he does.
On 21/01/2026 2:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo,
you are all caught up in your own self righteousness.
That's laughably incorrect. But answer me this dipshit, you insist I
should have spoken English at age 9 yet *all* the evidence presented
backs up why that was not the case in the 70's - not until 1985 and
only then in upper primary - so you were clearly 100% wrong.
There was *no* evidence presented to support your claim, you retard. On
the contrary, it was shown that English was a common language in
clogland even back in your "day" (which itself was bullshit), making it highly inlikely that you could come here as a 9 year old in the "1970's"
not speaking a word.
And while we're on that subject, you were born in 1973, yes?
In days gone by before you developed your love of secrecy about your
past, you'd stated a few times that you were almost exactly 10 years
younger than I am. I just had my 63rd birthday a couple of weeks ago, so that would put your birth year around 1973.
You have also stated that you did your apprenticeship for a French car specialist between 1988 and 1992, which would tie in just nicely with someone born in '73 as they'd be 15 years old at the time. Legally able
to leave school and start their training.
So assuming all that is correct, how do you figure that you came here as
a 9 year old in the 70's when if what I've mentioned here is accurate
you wouldn't have been 9 until 1982?
Please. Take a moment to explain how you either lied about coming here
as a 9 year old in the 1970's, or how you're about to start lying about
it now...
On 20/01/2026 10:44 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So, what proof have you that that is the reason that they left?
On 20/01/2026 9:55 pm, alvey wrote:
Not utter bullshit at all Fraudster. I can name posters who left
specifically because of you. Who can you name?
OK then name them, along with how you know why they left.
John_H, felix & Fred to name three. Respectively, because he busted
Fraudster lying plus his obsession with attacking Xeno, Fred and felix
both tired of Fraudsters antics and cretinous abuse and said so.
Now, if you haven't got anything useful to contribute I'd suggest that
you find something else to do. Jigsaws perhaps?
On 21/01/2026 5:12 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:44 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So, what proof have you that that is the reason that they left?
On 20/01/2026 9:55 pm, alvey wrote:
Not utter bullshit at all Fraudster. I can name posters who left
specifically because of you. Who can you name?
OK then name them, along with how you know why they left.
John_H, felix & Fred to name three. Respectively, because he busted
Fraudster lying plus his obsession with attacking Xeno, Fred and
felix both tired of Fraudsters antics and cretinous abuse and said so.
Now, if you haven't got anything useful to contribute I'd suggest
that you find something else to do. Jigsaws perhaps?
None, and he's talking utter nonsense if he thinks I'm responsible.
John_H couldn't have given a flying fuck about anything I had to say,
Felix left for the 19th time after making a total fuckwit of himself for
the 19th time, and for all anyone knows about Fred is he snuffed it.
If there's been anyone who's done more damage here than anyone else it's that fucking mental case ex teacher <snip trad>
On 21/01/2026 5:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to
pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on
you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so. However
despite your claims you never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have demanded.
Yep. Pretty simple actually. Yet despite all the noise these clowns make about how everything must be proved, they're incredibly short when it
comes to their own stuff :)
On 21/01/2026 5:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 21/1/2026 6:30 pm, Noddy wrote:All you did was to bore these people stupid, so they left.
On 21/01/2026 5:12 pm, keithr0 wrote:Aw gee, and all we did was expose you for the liar you are.
On 20/01/2026 10:44 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So, what proof have you that that is the reason that they left?
On 20/01/2026 9:55 pm, alvey wrote:
Not utter bullshit at all Fraudster. I can name posters who left >>>>>>> specifically because of you. Who can you name?
OK then name them, along with how you know why they left.
John_H, felix & Fred to name three. Respectively, because he busted >>>>> Fraudster lying plus his obsession with attacking Xeno, Fred and
felix both tired of Fraudsters antics and cretinous abuse and said so. >>>>>
Now, if you haven't got anything useful to contribute I'd suggest
that you find something else to do. Jigsaws perhaps?
None, and he's talking utter nonsense if he thinks I'm responsible.
John_H couldn't have given a flying fuck about anything I had to say,
Felix left for the 19th time after making a total fuckwit of himself
for the 19th time, and for all anyone knows about Fred is he snuffed it. >>>
If there's been anyone who's done more damage here than anyone else
it's that fucking mental case ex teacher, but his two loyal arse
lickers will never accept that.
On 20/01/2026 11:04 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:09 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:You and your mates are always banging on about proof, but your light
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car forums. >>>>>> It's because of people like him that that they all became
*moderated* forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on
about proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
Hey Detective Richo! Would it be 'hypocritical' to only interrogate
one gang in a gang war?
on for it when it is asked of you.
Really? Could you cite me for when I've refused to supply "proof"?
That is commonly known as hypocrisy.
Not until it's proven it's not.
Anyhoo, you failed to answer my question. (Gasp! Shock horror!)
Oh dear, I am devastated, did I not answer one of your many questions? I might consider it if you ever answered any.
On 21/01/2026 5:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to
pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on
you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so. However
despite your claims you never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have demanded.
Yep. Pretty simple actually. Yet despite all the noise these clowns make about how everything must be proved, they're incredibly short when it
comes to their own stuff :)
keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 11:04 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:09 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:You and your mates are always banging on about proof, but your light
On 20/01/2026 12:00 pm, Xeno wrote:
That won't work. He's been expelled from all the other car
forums. It's because of people like him that that they all became >>>>>>> *moderated* forums.
You have some verifiable proof of that? After all your carry on
about proof, you'd be a hypocrite if you don't.
Hey Detective Richo! Would it be 'hypocritical' to only interrogate >>>>> one gang in a gang war?
on for it when it is asked of you.
Really? Could you cite me for when I've refused to supply "proof"?
That is commonly known as hypocrisy.
Not until it's proven it's not.
Anyhoo, you failed to answer my question. (Gasp! Shock horror!)
Oh dear, I am devastated, did I not answer one of your many questions?
I might consider it if you ever answered any.
And that's a fine example of why I rate you so lowly Richo. You evade a relevant question, with all the dazzling foot work of an aged Three Toed Sloth. Then added in a dash of childish sarcasm and then closed with a blatantly idiotic obfuscation. Go and start a jigsaw Richo.
keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 5:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 21/1/2026 6:30 pm, Noddy wrote:All you did was to bore these people stupid, so they left.
On 21/01/2026 5:12 pm, keithr0 wrote:Aw gee, and all we did was expose you for the liar you are.
On 20/01/2026 10:44 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So, what proof have you that that is the reason that they left?
On 20/01/2026 9:55 pm, alvey wrote:
Not utter bullshit at all Fraudster. I can name posters who left >>>>>>>> specifically because of you. Who can you name?
OK then name them, along with how you know why they left.
John_H, felix & Fred to name three. Respectively, because he
busted Fraudster lying plus his obsession with attacking Xeno,
Fred and felix both tired of Fraudsters antics and cretinous abuse >>>>>> and said so.
Now, if you haven't got anything useful to contribute I'd suggest >>>>>> that you find something else to do. Jigsaws perhaps?
None, and he's talking utter nonsense if he thinks I'm responsible.
John_H couldn't have given a flying fuck about anything I had to
say, Felix left for the 19th time after making a total fuckwit of
himself for the 19th time, and for all anyone knows about Fred is he
snuffed it.
If there's been anyone who's done more damage here than anyone else
it's that fucking mental case ex teacher, but his two loyal arse
lickers will never accept that.
You'd be an authority on that...
On 21/01/2026 2:20 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back when you
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond to
demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
can ask politely.
For a bloke who throws falsehoods about other people around like it's confetti your expectations of politeness are ridiculous.
On 21/01/2026 5:12 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:44 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:So, what proof have you that that is the reason that they left?
On 20/01/2026 9:55 pm, alvey wrote:
Not utter bullshit at all Fraudster. I can name posters who left
specifically because of you. Who can you name?
OK then name them, along with how you know why they left.
John_H, felix & Fred to name three. Respectively, because he busted
Fraudster lying plus his obsession with attacking Xeno, Fred and
felix both tired of Fraudsters antics and cretinous abuse and said so.
Now, if you haven't got anything useful to contribute I'd suggest
that you find something else to do. Jigsaws perhaps?
None, and he's talking utter nonsense if he thinks I'm responsible.
John_H couldn't have given a flying fuck about anything I had to say,
Felix left for the 19th time after making a total fuckwit of himself for
the 19th time, and for all anyone knows about Fred is he snuffed it.
If there's been anyone who's done more damage here than anyone else it's that fucking mental case ex teacher, but his two loyal arse lickers will never accept that.
Noddy wrote:
On 21/01/2026 5:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to
pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on >>>>> you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so.
However despite your claims you never offered up any supporting
evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have demanded.
Yep. Pretty simple actually. Yet despite all the noise these clowns
make about how everything must be proved, they're incredibly short
when it comes to their own stuff :)
You made the claims Fraudster. You get to prove them.
Now name a claim I've made and run away from. Like you have so many,
many times.
On 21/01/2026 2:20 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back when you
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond to
demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
can ask politely.
For a bloke who throws falsehoods about other people around like it's confetti your expectations of politeness are ridiculous.
Clocky wrote:
On 21/01/2026 2:20 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back when
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond to
demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
you can ask politely.
For a bloke who throws falsehoods about other people around like it's
confetti your expectations of politeness are ridiculous.
The whole Richo persona is ridiculous.
On 21/01/2026 9:28 pm, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:Since you work hard on total anonymity, you're running away from
On 21/01/2026 5:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to >>>>>> pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you >>>>>> insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is
on you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so.
However despite your claims you never offered up any supporting
evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have
demanded.
Yep. Pretty simple actually. Yet despite all the noise these clowns
make about how everything must be proved, they're incredibly short
when it comes to their own stuff :)
You made the claims Fraudster. You get to prove them.
Now name a claim I've made and run away from. Like you have so many,
many times.
everything.
On 21/01/2026 2:41 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 21/01/2026 5:00 am, alvey wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to
pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on
you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so. However
despite your claims you never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
I'm more interested in why would I have to prove a statement he made
up in the first place.
It's not my problem that he has comprehension issues and is a habitual
liar.
We've been over this before enough times now. Your words were abundantly clear. If you choose to deny them now then the most plausible reason for that is because you were talking shit at the time.
Case closed.
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to
pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on
you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so. However
despite your claims you never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have demanded.
On 21/01/2026 9:38 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:As against alvo who doesn't have one, and clocky whose persona is
On 21/01/2026 2:20 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back when
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond to
demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
you can ask politely.
For a bloke who throws falsehoods about other people around like it's
confetti your expectations of politeness are ridiculous.
The whole Richo persona is ridiculous.
compatible to cyanide.
On 21/01/2026 4:29 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 21/01/2026 1:30 pm, alvey wrote:Simpleton.
Clocky wrote:
On 21/01/2026 5:04 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
One of them is a bad option. Any Tom, Dick or Keith could
cut'n'paste from a zillion sites and claim it as theirs.
Likely what he did in the first place, like everyone else who
programs an Arduino with existing libraries and code examples that
can easily be modified to suit a particular project as I had
described. He just can't admit to having done exactly that because
he claimed to be a more 'sooper speshal much betterer' programmer
than anyone else.
Yeah well I have my doubts about those claims.
If he posted his code it should be relatively easy to verify and of
course he realised this so he ran away with his tail between his legs.
It's a tad early to make that call, but one can always hope...
Well he might, but it should a no-brainer to determine if his code
compiles and what libraries it uses if he does.
On 21/01/2026 4:29 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 21/01/2026 1:30 pm, alvey wrote:Simpleton.
Clocky wrote:
On 21/01/2026 5:04 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
One of them is a bad option. Any Tom, Dick or Keith could
cut'n'paste from a zillion sites and claim it as theirs.
Likely what he did in the first place, like everyone else who
programs an Arduino with existing libraries and code examples that
can easily be modified to suit a particular project as I had
described. He just can't admit to having done exactly that because
he claimed to be a more 'sooper speshal much betterer' programmer
than anyone else.
Yeah well I have my doubts about those claims.
If he posted his code it should be relatively easy to verify and of
course he realised this so he ran away with his tail between his legs.
It's a tad early to make that call, but one can always hope...
Well he might, but it should a no-brainer to determine if his code
compiles and what libraries it uses if he does.
keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 9:38 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:As against alvo who doesn't have one, and clocky whose persona is
On 21/01/2026 2:20 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back when
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond to >>>>>>> demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
you can ask politely.
For a bloke who throws falsehoods about other people around like
it's confetti your expectations of politeness are ridiculous.
The whole Richo persona is ridiculous.
compatible to cyanide.
So lame that you should be allowed to park in the disabled spots.
On 22/1/2026 8:34 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:I'm disappointed! Keith didn't include me. :-(
On 21/01/2026 9:38 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:As against alvo who doesn't have one, and clocky whose persona is
On 21/01/2026 2:20 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back when >>>>>> you can ask politely.
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond to >>>>>>>> demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
For a bloke who throws falsehoods about other people around like
it's confetti your expectations of politeness are ridiculous.
The whole Richo persona is ridiculous.
compatible to cyanide.
So lame that you should be allowed to park in the disabled spots.
It's rather ironic but Keith has become exactly what he rails against.
On 21/01/2026 4:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 4:29 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 21/01/2026 1:30 pm, alvey wrote:Simpleton.
Clocky wrote:
On 21/01/2026 5:04 am, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
Provide a programming example or keep running you liar.
Those are your options.
One of them is a bad option. Any Tom, Dick or Keith could
cut'n'paste from a zillion sites and claim it as theirs.
Likely what he did in the first place, like everyone else who
programs an Arduino with existing libraries and code examples that
can easily be modified to suit a particular project as I had
described. He just can't admit to having done exactly that because
he claimed to be a more 'sooper speshal much betterer' programmer
than anyone else.
Yeah well I have my doubts about those claims.
It's a tad early to make that call, but one can always hope...
If he posted his code it should be relatively easy to verify and of >>>>> course he realised this so he ran away with his tail between his legs. >>>>
Well he might, but it should a no-brainer to determine if his code
compiles and what libraries it uses if he does.
Ah, so there you have it - I hit the nail right on the head didn't I you pathetic weasel.
keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 9:28 pm, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:Since you work hard on total anonymity, you're running away from
On 21/01/2026 5:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you >>>>>>> to pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but >>>>>>> you insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus >>>>>>> is on you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do
so. However despite your claims you never offered up any
supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that? >>>>>
demanded.
Yep. Pretty simple actually. Yet despite all the noise these clowns
make about how everything must be proved, they're incredibly short
when it comes to their own stuff :)
You made the claims Fraudster. You get to prove them.
Now name a claim I've made and run away from. Like you have so many,
many times.
everything.
This makes even less sense than your usual mush.
keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to
pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on
you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so. However
despite your claims you never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have demanded.
Go on then. Explain how.
On 22/01/2026 7:27 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 9:28 pm, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:Since you work hard on total anonymity, you're running away from
On 21/01/2026 5:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you >>>>>>>> to pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, >>>>>>>> but you insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the >>>>>>>> onus is on you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to >>>>>>>> do so. However despite your claims you never offered up any
supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that? >>>>>>
demanded.
Yep. Pretty simple actually. Yet despite all the noise these clowns >>>>> make about how everything must be proved, they're incredibly short
when it comes to their own stuff :)
You made the claims Fraudster. You get to prove them.
Now name a claim I've made and run away from. Like you have so many,
many times.
everything.
This makes even less sense than your usual mush.
Usual avoidance.
On 22/01/2026 7:30 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to
pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you
insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is on >>>>> you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so.
However despite your claims you never offered up any supporting
evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have demanded.
Go on then. Explain how.
You work it out, you seem to imply that you are intelligent, so go ahead
and prove that too.
On 22/01/2026 4:22 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 22/1/2026 8:34 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:I'm disappointed! Keith didn't include me. :-(
On 21/01/2026 9:38 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:As against alvo who doesn't have one, and clocky whose persona is
On 21/01/2026 2:20 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond >>>>>>>>> to demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
when you can ask politely.
For a bloke who throws falsehoods about other people around like
it's confetti your expectations of politeness are ridiculous.
The whole Richo persona is ridiculous.
compatible to cyanide.
So lame that you should be allowed to park in the disabled spots.
Sorry to disappoint you, your persona is that of a fake intellectual.
It's rather ironic but Keith has become exactly what he rails against.
Nope, I rail against posting the same shit every day for years.
On 22/01/2026 4:22 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 22/1/2026 8:34 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:I'm disappointed! Keith didn't include me. :-(
On 21/01/2026 9:38 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:As against alvo who doesn't have one, and clocky whose persona is
On 21/01/2026 2:20 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond >>>>>>>>> to demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
when you can ask politely.
For a bloke who throws falsehoods about other people around like
it's confetti your expectations of politeness are ridiculous.
The whole Richo persona is ridiculous.
compatible to cyanide.
So lame that you should be allowed to park in the disabled spots.
Sorry to disappoint you, your persona is that of a fake intellectual.
It's rather ironic but Keith has become exactly what he rails against.
Nope, I rail against posting the same shit every day for years.
On 21/01/2026 2:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo,
you are all caught up in your own self righteousness.
That's laughably incorrect. But answer me this dipshit, you insist I
should have spoken English at age 9 yet *all* the evidence presented
backs up why that was not the case in the 70's - not until 1985 and
only then in upper primary - so you were clearly 100% wrong.
There was *no* evidence presented to support your claim
On 21/1/2026 6:46 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 21/01/2026 2:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo,
you are all caught up in your own self righteousness.
That's laughably incorrect. But answer me this dipshit, you insist I
should have spoken English at age 9 yet *all* the evidence presented
backs up why that was not the case in the 70's - not until 1985 and
only then in upper primary - so you were clearly 100% wrong.
There was *no* evidence presented to support your claim, you retard. On
Plenty of evidence supplied. It isn't Clocky's fault you're illiterate.
the contrary, it was shown that English was a common language in
clogland even back in your "day" (which itself was bullshit), making
it highly inlikely that you could come here as a 9 year old in the
"1970's" not speaking a word.
And while we're on that subject, you were born in 1973, yes?
In days gone by before you developed your love of secrecy about your
past, you'd stated a few times that you were almost exactly 10 years
younger than I am. I just had my 63rd birthday a couple of weeks ago,
so that would put your birth year around 1973.
You have also stated that you did your apprenticeship for a French car
specialist between 1988 and 1992, which would tie in just nicely with
someone born in '73 as they'd be 15 years old at the time. Legally
able to leave school and start their training.
So assuming all that is correct, how do you figure that you came here
as a 9 year old in the 70's when if what I've mentioned here is
accurate you wouldn't have been 9 until 1982?
Piss easy. You have it wrong. HTH
On 22/01/2026 4:22 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 22/1/2026 8:34 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:I'm disappointed! Keith didn't include me. :-(
On 21/01/2026 9:38 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:As against alvo who doesn't have one, and clocky whose persona is
On 21/01/2026 2:20 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond >>>>>>>>> to demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
when you can ask politely.
For a bloke who throws falsehoods about other people around like
it's confetti your expectations of politeness are ridiculous.
The whole Richo persona is ridiculous.
compatible to cyanide.
So lame that you should be allowed to park in the disabled spots.
Sorry to disappoint you, your persona is that of a fake intellectual.
It's rather ironic but Keith has become exactly what he rails against.
Nope, I rail against posting the same shit every day for years.
keithr0 wrote:
On 22/01/2026 7:27 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 9:28 pm, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:Since you work hard on total anonymity, you're running away from
On 21/01/2026 5:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you >>>>>>>>> to pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, >>>>>>>>> but you insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, >>>>>>>>> the onus is on you to prove your claim and you have an
obligation to do so. However despite your claims you never
offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that? >>>>>>>
demanded.
Yep. Pretty simple actually. Yet despite all the noise these
clowns make about how everything must be proved, they're
incredibly short when it comes to their own stuff :)
You made the claims Fraudster. You get to prove them.
Now name a claim I've made and run away from. Like you have so
many, many times.
everything.
This makes even less sense than your usual mush.
Usual avoidance.
Mush to slush. Dennis knows what I'm supposed to be avoiding.
keithr0 wrote:
On 22/01/2026 7:30 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled you to >>>>>> pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called bullshit, but you >>>>>> insisted it was true. According to your mental mate, the onus is
on you to prove your claim and you have an obligation to do so.
However despite your claims you never offered up any supporting
evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove that?
No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have
demanded.
Go on then. Explain how.
You work it out, you seem to imply that you are intelligent, so go
ahead and prove that too.
You've made a real pig's breakfast of this Richo.
Even if you could see it, or have it (slowly) explained to you, you'd
refuse to admit it and run away, so I'm not going to bother.
You really shouldn't try flaming anyone Richo as you're seriously
hopeless at it.
keithr0 wrote:
On 22/01/2026 4:22 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 22/1/2026 8:34 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:I'm disappointed! Keith didn't include me. :-(
On 21/01/2026 9:38 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:As against alvo who doesn't have one, and clocky whose persona is
On 21/01/2026 2:20 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back >>>>>>>> when you can ask politely.
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond >>>>>>>>>> to demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
For a bloke who throws falsehoods about other people around like >>>>>>> it's confetti your expectations of politeness are ridiculous.
The whole Richo persona is ridiculous.
compatible to cyanide.
So lame that you should be allowed to park in the disabled spots.
Sorry to disappoint you, your persona is that of a fake intellectual.
It's rather ironic but Keith has become exactly what he rails against.
Nope, I rail against posting the same shit every day for years.
Looks like Xeno is correct...
On 22/01/2026 2:26 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 22/01/2026 4:22 pm, Xeno wrote:
On 22/1/2026 8:34 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:I'm disappointed! Keith didn't include me. :-(
On 21/01/2026 9:38 pm, alvey wrote:
Clocky wrote:As against alvo who doesn't have one, and clocky whose persona is
On 21/01/2026 2:20 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:<yawn>> just deleted the rest of this conversation. Call back >>>>>>>> when you can ask politely.
On 20/01/2026 9:40 pm, Clocky wrote:
If you want some sample code then ask nicely, I don't respond >>>>>>>>>> to demands or threats.
Or when it gets tricky
For a bloke who throws falsehoods about other people around like >>>>>>> it's confetti your expectations of politeness are ridiculous.
The whole Richo persona is ridiculous.
compatible to cyanide.
So lame that you should be allowed to park in the disabled spots.
Sorry to disappoint you, your persona is that of a fake intellectual.
It's rather ironic but Keith has become exactly what he rails against.
Nope, I rail against posting the same shit every day for years.
Xeno is right then :-)
On 22/01/2026 6:03 pm, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:In that case you're even more stupid than I gave you credit for
On 22/01/2026 7:27 am, alvey wrote:
keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 9:28 pm, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:Since you work hard on total anonymity, you're running away from
On 21/01/2026 5:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
On 21/01/2026 7:00 am, alvey wrote:
Noddy wrote:
On 20/01/2026 10:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
You claimed that you repaired so many ECU's that it enabled >>>>>>>>>> you to pay of your house in 6 years. Most people called
bullshit, but you insisted it was true. According to your >>>>>>>>>> mental mate, the onus is on you to prove your claim and you >>>>>>>>>> have an obligation to do so. However despite your claims you >>>>>>>>>> never offered up any supporting evidence.
Why was that?
Just as a matter of minimal interest... How *could* you prove >>>>>>>>> that?
No harder than the proofs that you nd your fellow cultist have >>>>>>>> demanded.
Yep. Pretty simple actually. Yet despite all the noise these
clowns make about how everything must be proved, they're
incredibly short when it comes to their own stuff :)
You made the claims Fraudster. You get to prove them.
Now name a claim I've made and run away from. Like you have so
many, many times.
everything.
This makes even less sense than your usual mush.
Usual avoidance.
Mush to slush. Dennis knows what I'm supposed to be avoiding.
On 21/01/2026 3:46 pm, Noddy wrote:
On 21/01/2026 2:59 pm, Clocky wrote:
On 20/01/2026 8:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
ROTFL, the question is who has the biggest ego, you, xeno, or alvo,
you are all caught up in your own self righteousness.
That's laughably incorrect. But answer me this dipshit, you insist I
should have spoken English at age 9 yet *all* the evidence presented
backs up why that was not the case in the 70's - not until 1985 and
only then in upper primary - so you were clearly 100% wrong.
There was *no* evidence presented to support your claim
From the Dutch government website and Wikipedia (your own fucking
link!) for starters.
All of it backs up *exactly* what I stated and not the anecdotal rubbish keith and you dreamed up out of nowhere.
And no, I was not born in "1973"˙ detective halfwit :-)
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 21:18:14 |
| Calls: | 117 |
| Calls today: | 117 |
| Files: | 367 |
| D/L today: |
560 files (257M bytes) |
| Messages: | 70,875 |
| Posted today: | 26 |