On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 09:07:29 -0000 (UTC), Handsome Jack wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:49:49 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote:
There is another way, and that is to use options like --link-dest to
create separate point-in-time snapshots with deduping to save space.
I don't understand the instructions for link-dest either in the "rsync
--help" command line, or in man.
First backup:
rsync ®various-options¯ ®src-dir¯ ®backup-dir-1¯
Second backup:
rsync ®various-options¯ --link-dest=®backup-dir-1¯ ®src-dir¯
®backup-dir-2¯
Now you have backups from two points in time. For restore purposes, each
one looks like a full backup, even though the second one was created as
an incremental backup. The --link-dest option means that files that were unchanged share a single copy that is hard-linked into both places,
saving both storage space and network traffic (if the backup is being
done over a network).
You can continue this sequence to save backups from as many points in
time as you like. To get rid of old backups, just do
rm -rf ®backup-dir-1¯
etc.
On 16 Nov 2025 02:45:30 GMT
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
It cost $45 for a lifetime liesence with upgrades included.
It costs ?24,38 :)
https://store.teejeetech.com/product/baqpaq/#reviews
But I don't actually see how it helps. Both this method and the
ordinary method still have to make a full backup copy of every new
file in the live system ...
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 19:04:44 |
| Calls: | 117 |
| Calls today: | 117 |
| Files: | 367 |
| D/L today: |
546 files (254M bytes) |
| Messages: | 70,845 |
| Posted today: | 26 |