On 2026-03-12 6:42 p.m., Lars Poulsen wrote:
On 2026-03-12, Mr. Man-wai Chang <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
Modern Linux can run Windows programs via WINE or maybe CrossOver. I am
NOT tracking those things.... so far. It's been a long time.
Business applications can use Java which runs inside a browser, and
hence not tightly coupled with Windows.
Some Windows programs can run with Wine, but some very significant ones
cannot, and do not have easy substitutes.
For example:
- QuickBooks. Pretty much the "must-have" small business accounting
ÿÿ software.
- PhotoShop. Pretty much the "must-have" professional image application
ÿÿ program for photographers, print shops, graphical designers etc.
When Linux versions of these become available for Linux, the world will
shift. But at this time, these will lock their user base into Windows or
Mac.
Here's the kicker: Linux versions of either program will never be available. Anyone developing a product worth a damn has no idea whether it should be a Flatpak, a Snap, compiled from source, a .deb or an .rpm. Even if they get it right and go with Flatpak, the angry people running Linux desktops will protest and make them regret ever bothering with the operating system. It's happened numerous times before and it will happen again.
On 3/12/2026 9:42 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
It meant that Win12 is replacing the concept of the PC, as we knew it.
Just an illusion! Hardware is hardware, software is software. :)
I get the idea that with Win12, you just treat it like in "Star Trek TNG".ÿ I'm not biting on that, ever.ÿ Linux or Win11.
On Thu, 3/12/2026 8:47 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-03-12 6:42 p.m., Lars Poulsen wrote:
On 2026-03-12, Mr. Man-wai Chang <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
Modern Linux can run Windows programs via WINE or maybe CrossOver. I am >>>> NOT tracking those things.... so far. It's been a long time.
Business applications can use Java which runs inside a browser, and
hence not tightly coupled with Windows.
Some Windows programs can run with Wine, but some very significant ones
cannot, and do not have easy substitutes.
For example:
- QuickBooks. Pretty much the "must-have" small business accounting
ÿÿ software.
- PhotoShop. Pretty much the "must-have" professional image application
ÿÿ program for photographers, print shops, graphical designers etc.
When Linux versions of these become available for Linux, the world will
shift. But at this time, these will lock their user base into Windows or >>> Mac.
Here's the kicker: Linux versions of either program will never be available. Anyone developing a product worth a damn has no idea whether it should be a Flatpak, a Snap, compiled from source, a .deb or an .rpm. Even if they get it right and go with Flatpak, the angry people running Linux desktops will protest and make them regret ever bothering with the operating system. It's happened numerous times before and it will happen again.
All you really need, is a business case.
"How much can we make ?"
"What will the devs to do this cost us ?"
The technical details are for the devs to work out.
Yes, it's a chicken versus egg problem. But it
starts with the first derivative of the Linux growth rate.
Is the Linux transition moving quickly ?
Are
"large forces on the landscape about to cut off our oxygen" ?
If the arithmetic of opportunity isn't there, then it
isn't going to happen. And precisely how much fevered corporate
activity do you see in general ? Are there companies who
are going to "take it all for themselves" ? Fear of Missing Out,
is a good driver for a transition. But as long as there
are no flags or lead indicators, it will be business as usual.
If companies in the 1980s couldn't see the point of porting over to the Atari ST because of its limited user base, you can imagine why they wouldn't care about Linux users.
< snip >
On Fri, 3/13/2026 10:21 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
If companies in the 1980s couldn't see the point of porting over to the
Atari ST because of its limited user base, you can imagine why they wouldn't >> care about Linux users.
< snip >
Porting software isn't that hard any more.
Porting badly written software is hard though.
Photoshop has always liked to do "custom" librariesPhotoshop is never going to get a Linux native port. Nevertheless, there
for things. They do their own "malloc" for example.
Not all of the Adobe shops, do things that way.
This makes it harder to do ports.
On 3/11/26 7:17 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-12-rumors-linux-migration/W11 pushed me to Apple Mac.
It is clearly true that the "PC" era ends with Linux and Win11.
On Wed, 11 Mar 2026 19:17:18 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-12-rumors-linux-migration/
It is clearly true that the "PC" era ends with Linux and Win11.
Sometimes I wonder if M$ is going to produce its own version of linux
(free with ads).
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 117:53:59 |
| Calls: | 125 |
| Calls today: | 125 |
| Files: | 489 |
| D/L today: |
859 files (365M bytes) |
| Messages: | 76,488 |
| Posted today: | 26 |