It's the whole stretch of road that needs considering.
Anyway, I've driven through hundreds of times, you are just
misinterpreting online views.
Roland
You are missing the original alignment of the road over the earlier
bridge and the one earlier than that.
In message <n7tt11F5svsU1@mid.individual.net>, at 17:26:09 on Fri, 29If you look at your old maps, you'll see the bridge and the route over
May 2026, Rupert Moss-Eccardt <news@moss-eccardt.com> remarked:
It's the whole stretch of road that needs considering.
Anyway, I've driven through hundreds of times, you are just
misinterpreting online views.
Roland
You are missing the original alignment of the road over the earlier
bridge and the one earlier than that.
"Missing" in what sense? I have maps going back 400yrs, long before the railway, and when the bridge was absolutely 100% the one over the Ouse
(and not as recliner continues to ludicrously claim, the one which
carries the railway over the road).
ps It wasn't just a bridge over the Ouse, at the City end was a
Drawbridge, to keep out revolting peasants etc.
--
It's clear from the various other maps that the transition obviously >>>occurs at the junctions where the level crossing and bridge routes
split and rejoin.
But the maps don't agree with one another.
It's not an opinion poll with majority voting for their favourite name for the road. The two definitive maps (National
Street Gazetteer and OS) do agree with each other, and that's all that matters. The other maps are secondary sources,
but most do agree with the definitive sources.
So there's nothing to debate: the news report that you derided used the correct name, and you were hallucinating.
In message <3gpa1lds4e1o2jf1804fiperk154l0rcf2@4ax.com>, at 10:23:59 on
Tue, 26 May 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
It's clear from the various other maps that the transition obviously
occurs at the junctions where the level crossing and bridge routes
split and rejoin.
But the maps don't agree with one another.
It's not an opinion poll with majority voting for their favourite name
for the road. The two definitive maps (National
Street Gazetteer and OS) do agree with each other, and that's all that
matters. The other maps are secondary sources,
but most do agree with the definitive sources.
So there's nothing to debate: the news report that you derided used the
correct name, and you were hallucinating.
Jury is still out on this one, especially as you are very confused about which bridge it is (hint: it's absolutely definitely the one over the river).
On 1 Jun 2026 17:45, Roland Perry wrote:
In message <n7tt11F5svsU1@mid.individual.net>, at 17:26:09 on Fri, 29If you look at your old maps, you'll see the bridge and the route over
May 2026, Rupert Moss-Eccardt <news@moss-eccardt.com> remarked:
It's the whole stretch of road that needs considering.
Anyway, I've driven through hundreds of times, you are just
misinterpreting online views.
Roland
You are missing the original alignment of the road over the earlier >>>bridge and the one earlier than that.
"Missing" in what sense? I have maps going back 400yrs, long before the
railway, and when the bridge was absolutely 100% the one over the Ouse
(and not as recliner continues to ludicrously claim, the one which
carries the railway over the road).
ps It wasn't just a bridge over the Ouse, at the City end was a
Drawbridge, to keep out revolting peasants etc.
--
the level crossing, though the crossing isn't explicitly marked is
straight with the underpass being clearly a diversion.
Roland has reached his usual state of desperately floundering around,
looking for any scrap of evidence, however threadbare, to try and justify
an incorrect statement of his. His religion simply does not permit him to >ever admit he was wrong.
Jury is still out on this one, especially as you are very confused about
which bridge it is (hint: it's absolutely definitely the one over the
river).
The jury announced its verdict long ago: the article was right and you were >wrong.
In message <5alTR.35$ARB1.11@fx10.ams1>, at 19:35:29 on Mon, 1 Jun 2026, >Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
Jury is still out on this one, especially as you are very confused about >>> which bridge it is (hint: it's absolutely definitely the one over the
river).
The jury announced its verdict long ago: the article was right and you were >>wrong.
Nope, and given you don't even understand which bridge it is, I give
your unsubstantiated opinion zero credit.
Huh? Every single map agrees that the road under the railway low bridge is called Bridge Road.
Only your hallucination disagrees.
On 02/06/2026 14:39, Recliner wrote:
Huh? Every single map agrees that the road under the railway low bridge is called Bridge Road.
Low bridges - is it always one side bashed ?
Only your hallucination disagrees.
https://opentopomap.org/#map=17/52.39108/0.26729 (Garmin)
On 02/06/2026 14:39, Recliner wrote:
Huh? Every single map agrees that the road under the railway low bridge
is called Bridge Road.
Low bridges - is it always one side bashed ?
Only your hallucination disagrees.
https://opentopomap.org/#map=17/52.39108/0.26729 (Garmin)
Streetview also gets it right:
https://maps.app.goo.gl/KSCtxt4vEqJ4Vm2G9
But depending on the zoom, the overhead views sometimes label Bridge Road as Station Road.
On Tue, 2 Jun 2026 14:11:59 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
In message <5alTR.35$ARB1.11@fx10.ams1>, at 19:35:29 on Mon, 1 Jun 2026, >>Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
Jury is still out on this one, especially as you are very confused about >>>> which bridge it is (hint: it's absolutely definitely the one over the
river).
The jury announced its verdict long ago: the article was right and you were >>>wrong.
Nope, and given you don't even understand which bridge it is, I give
your unsubstantiated opinion zero credit.
Huh? Every single map agrees that the road under the railway low bridge is called Bridge Road.
On 02/06/2026 14:39, Recliner wrote:
Huh? Every single map agrees that the road under the railway low
bridge is called Bridge Road.
Low bridges - is it always one side bashed ?
Only your hallucination disagrees.
https://opentopomap.org/#map=17/52.39108/0.26729 (Garmin)
In message <10vmote$2o9nu$1@dont-email.me>, at 15:21:34 on Tue, 2 Jun
2026, Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> remarked:
On 02/06/2026 14:39, Recliner wrote:
Huh? Every single map agrees that the road under the railway low
bridge is called Bridge Road.
Low bridges - is it always one side bashed ?
The inbound side gets bashed more, despite it having the most prominent signage. That part of the bridge is only the goods loop, which is why passenger trains aren't affected.
Only your hallucination disagrees.
https://opentopomap.org/#map=17/52.39108/0.26729 (Garmin)
Which shows the level crossing stub as "Bridge Road", and doesn't name
the underpass.
Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
In message <10vmote$2o9nu$1@dont-email.me>, at 15:21:34 on Tue, 2 Jun
2026, Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> remarked:
On 02/06/2026 14:39, Recliner wrote:
Huh? Every single map agrees that the road under the railway low
bridge is called Bridge Road.
Low bridges - is it always one side bashed ?
The inbound side gets bashed more, despite it having the most prominent
signage. That part of the bridge is only the goods loop, which is why
passenger trains aren't affected.
Only your hallucination disagrees.
https://opentopomap.org/#map=17/52.39108/0.26729 (Garmin)
Which shows the level crossing stub as "Bridge Road", and doesn't name
the underpass.
It?s a crowd-sourced map, so it likely to have many incorrect, uncorrected >details. Still to the official reference maps, and they are unanimous.
In message <m5nt1l5eeoqumevp6shmif01ehqcs4klqb@4ax.com>, at 14:39:09 on
Tue, 2 Jun 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2026 14:11:59 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
In message <5alTR.35$ARB1.11@fx10.ams1>, at 19:35:29 on Mon, 1 Jun 2026, >>>Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
Jury is still out on this one, especially as you are very confused about >>>>> which bridge it is (hint: it's absolutely definitely the one over the >>>>> river).
The jury announced its verdict long ago: the article was right and you were >>>>wrong.
Nope, and given you don't even understand which bridge it is, I give
your unsubstantiated opinion zero credit.
Huh? Every single map agrees that the road under the railway low bridge is called Bridge Road.
Actually, they don't. But keep deflecting, as is your want.
But keep deflecting, as is your want.
On Tue, 2 Jun 2026 15:21:34 +0100, Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote:
On 02/06/2026 14:39, Recliner wrote:
Huh? Every single map agrees that the road under the railway low bridge is called Bridge Road.
Low bridges - is it always one side bashed ?
Only your hallucination disagrees.
https://opentopomap.org/#map=17/52.39108/0.26729 (Garmin)
Is that crowd-sourced data?
Meanwhile OSM also has two data errors. It correctly identifies the road under the rail bridge as Bridge Road, but
incorrectly describes the road south of the junction with Station Road as Bridge Road, when it should be Station Road.
On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 10:23:46 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
In message <m5nt1l5eeoqumevp6shmif01ehqcs4klqb@4ax.com>, at 14:39:09 on >>Tue, 2 Jun 2026, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2026 14:11:59 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
In message <5alTR.35$ARB1.11@fx10.ams1>, at 19:35:29 on Mon, 1 Jun 2026, >>>>Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
Jury is still out on this one, especially as you are very confused about >>>>>> which bridge it is (hint: it's absolutely definitely the one over the >>>>>> river).
The jury announced its verdict long ago: the article was right and you were
wrong.
Nope, and given you don't even understand which bridge it is, I give >>>>your unsubstantiated opinion zero credit.
Huh? Every single map agrees that the road under the railway low
bridge is called Bridge Road.
Actually, they don't. But keep deflecting, as is your want.
Of course they do. Both the National Street Gazetteer and the OS agree. >That's the definitive answer.
And, as always, you were wrong.
But keep deflecting, as is your want.
I think you meant 'wont'. But 'deflecting' seems to be your anglicised >version of your mentor's 'fake news' ? anything that proves you wrong.
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 494929:44:15 |
| Calls: | 162 |
| Files: | 568 |
| D/L today: |
14 files (349K bytes) |
| Messages: | 74,982 |