I use an HP Microserver N54L running Linux Mint xfce to create iso files from DVDs and to act as a home media server, the files are backed up to a Windows PC on my home network.
I have two backup programs, Smart Sync Pro and SyncBackSE which are too clever for their own good. I believe the date/time kept on the Linux
machine is more accurate than that on the Windows machine. Originally I switched from Smart Sync Pro to SyncBackSE because the latter didn't get confused, however, I just went to run a backup and it wants to copy absolutely everything.
Is anybody aware of a backup program that will just consider file path and file size in deciding whether of not a backup is needed? Would XCOPY work?
I tried to ask in the Linux group but somebody wanted to start an advocacy war there.
If not I am going to have to fire up Visual Studio and see what I can do...
I use an HP Microserver N54L running Linux Mint xfce to create iso files from DVDs and to act as a home media server, the files are backed up to a Windows PC on my home network.
I have two backup programs, Smart Sync Pro and SyncBackSE which are too clever for their own good. I believe the date/time kept on the Linux
machine is more accurate than that on the Windows machine.
Originally I
switched from Smart Sync Pro to SyncBackSE because the latter didn't get confused, however, I just went to run a backup and it wants to copy absolutely everything.
Is anybody aware of a backup program that will just consider file path and file size in deciding whether of not a backup is needed? Would XCOPY work?
I tried to ask in the Linux group but somebody wanted to start an advocacy war there.
If not I am going to have to fire up Visual Studio and see what I can do...
If not I am going to have to fire up Visual Studio and see what I can do...
Jeff Gaines wrote:
there was a link in one of the Linux directories which in Windows is a >>file (*.lnk). However, Windows apps treat a Linux link as a directory so >>were trying to back up files that it had discovered in the "directory".
.lnk files aren't hard or soft links (in a linux sense) they're shortcuts >known to windows explorer.
<https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-shllink/16cb4ca1-9339-4d0c-a68d-bf1d6cc0f943>
Windows does [now] have both hard and soft links (in the linux sense).
<https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/symbolic-links>
<https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/hard-links-and-junctions>
if you want the full set, see also .pif files
<https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/3235893/editing-pif-files-in-windows-10>
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 6 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 493396:22:12 |
| Calls: | 141 |
| Files: | 538 |
| Messages: | 76,256 |