I rescue/repair/reuse/repurpose, a lot of kit. Many small
appliances have external power adapter.
And, those adapters often get separated from their associated
kit.
One can determine the type of mating connector required
by an examination of the power-inlet on the device.
And, the device will usually indicate actual power requirements
in some way or another. Often including polarity.
There is obviously an aftermarket for these power supplies
(warts/bricks).
Yet, invariably, the vendors go to extra lengths to remove any
similar indications ON the devices they are selling. As if
it was a trade secret of considerable value (why bother, otherwise?)
I don't understand the thinking behind this. To whom are they trying to avoid disclosing the information? Competitors? Customers??
Note that the obscured markings don't help with identifying the
actual physical connectors as they are only represented abstractly
or schematically. And, Vout/Iout would seem to WANT to be disclosed
so the customer is assured that these comply with the Vin/Iin
requirements often stated in the documentation for the device powered
by said adapter.
For 2-pin connectors (e.g., barrel), the "pinout" is almost always
"center positive" (in the US) so there's nothing to be gained by
obscuring THAT.
Are they afraid someone is going to BUY a connector and MAKE an
power supply, thus depriving them of ONE sale? Are they sure the
powered device doesn't already disclose the information they are
trying to suppress? Or, a competitor's product? Or, a forum??
It seems about as useful as blurring the size code on an
automobile tire and just claiming "Fits Lexus RX"
(as if they were the sole guardian of those "secrets"
and no one else knows ANYTHING about a Lexus RX!)
"Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:10v9en4$3fbfu$1@dont-email.me...
I rescue/repair/reuse/repurpose, a lot of kit. Many small
appliances have external power adapter.
And, those adapters often get separated from their associated
kit.
One can determine the type of mating connector required
by an examination of the power-inlet on the device.
And, the device will usually indicate actual power requirements
in some way or another. Often including polarity.
There is obviously an aftermarket for these power supplies
(warts/bricks).
Yet, invariably, the vendors go to extra lengths to remove any
similar indications ON the devices they are selling. As if
it was a trade secret of considerable value (why bother, otherwise?)
I don't understand the thinking behind this. To whom are they trying to
avoid disclosing the information? Competitors? Customers??
One reason may be marketing.
A good percentage of people who order the wrong item won't bother to return it.
Another reason might be an attempt to reduce the return rate for wrong items.
A good percentage of people have no understanding of how to match
a power adapter with a specific piece of equipment and no understanding
of what may happen if you connect a 12V adapter to a 5V port.
So it's best to leave that to those who can actually measure the V and
check the polarity and make sure there is enough A.
Then those who get it wrong can't make silly claims like I didn't see
why 12V would be a problem for a 5V device because it was the
correct connector so I'm suing you for $$$ for damaging my equipment.
Note that the obscured markings don't help with identifying the
actual physical connectors as they are only represented abstractly
or schematically. And, Vout/Iout would seem to WANT to be disclosed
so the customer is assured that these comply with the Vin/Iin
requirements often stated in the documentation for the device powered
by said adapter.
For 2-pin connectors (e.g., barrel), the "pinout" is almost always
"center positive" (in the US) so there's nothing to be gained by
obscuring THAT.
I recall an individual who wouldn't let me get a https://www.google.com/search?q=roland+ep7
working in minutes rather than days because you have to use the
correct adapter. Cutting wires to reverse the polarity is not allowed.
(It has positive outer).
Are they afraid someone is going to BUY a connector and MAKE an
power supply, thus depriving them of ONE sale? Are they sure the
powered device doesn't already disclose the information they are
trying to suppress? Or, a competitor's product? Or, a forum??
It seems about as useful as blurring the size code on an
automobile tire and just claiming "Fits Lexus RX"
(as if they were the sole guardian of those "secrets"
and no one else knows ANYTHING about a Lexus RX!)
On 05/28/2026 07:58 AM, Edward Rawde wrote:
"Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message
news:10v9en4$3fbfu$1@dont-email.me...
I rescue/repair/reuse/repurpose, a lot of kit. Many small
appliances have external power adapter.
And, those adapters often get separated from their associated
kit.
One can determine the type of mating connector required
by an examination of the power-inlet on the device.
And, the device will usually indicate actual power requirements
in some way or another. Often including polarity.
There is obviously an aftermarket for these power supplies
(warts/bricks).
Yet, invariably, the vendors go to extra lengths to remove any
similar indications ON the devices they are selling. As if
it was a trade secret of considerable value (why bother, otherwise?)
I don't understand the thinking behind this. To whom are they trying to >>> avoid disclosing the information? Competitors? Customers??
One reason may be marketing.
A good percentage of people who order the wrong item won't bother to
return it.
Another reason might be an attempt to reduce the return rate for wrong
items.
A good percentage of people have no understanding of how to match
a power adapter with a specific piece of equipment and no understanding
of what may happen if you connect a 12V adapter to a 5V port.
So it's best to leave that to those who can actually measure the V and
check the polarity and make sure there is enough A.
Then those who get it wrong can't make silly claims like I didn't see
why 12V would be a problem for a 5V device because it was the
correct connector so I'm suing you for $$$ for damaging my equipment.
Note that the obscured markings don't help with identifying the
actual physical connectors as they are only represented abstractly
or schematically. And, Vout/Iout would seem to WANT to be disclosed
so the customer is assured that these comply with the Vin/Iin
requirements often stated in the documentation for the device powered
by said adapter.
For 2-pin connectors (e.g., barrel), the "pinout" is almost always
"center positive" (in the US) so there's nothing to be gained by
obscuring THAT.
I recall an individual who wouldn't let me get a
https://www.google.com/search?q=roland+ep7
working in minutes rather than days because you have to use the
correct adapter. Cutting wires to reverse the polarity is not allowed.
(It has positive outer).
Are they afraid someone is going to BUY a connector and MAKE an
power supply, thus depriving them of ONE sale? Are they sure the
powered device doesn't already disclose the information they are
trying to suppress? Or, a competitor's product? Or, a forum??
It seems about as useful as blurring the size code on an
automobile tire and just claiming "Fits Lexus RX"
(as if they were the sole guardian of those "secrets"
and no one else knows ANYTHING about a Lexus RX!)
How about cordless power tools and the idea of making a
simpled corded adapter so that at some future point it's
simple to keep the tool running even if the battery manufacturer
has moved on yet AC mains is still a thing?
These days it seems that the cordless tool manufacturers
are simply using "USB charging" or a similar protocol.
Some cordless tool manufacturers do offer a corded adapter,
or Ridgid does, and various owners of the tools have reverse
engineered the protocols, and made their own.
I rescue/repair/reuse/repurpose, a lot of kit. Many small
appliances have external power adapter.
And, those adapters often get separated from their associated
kit.
One can determine the type of mating connector required
by an examination of the power-inlet on the device.
And, the device will usually indicate actual power requirements
in some way or another. Often including polarity.
There is obviously an aftermarket for these power supplies
(warts/bricks).
Yet, invariably, the vendors go to extra lengths to remove any
similar indications ON the devices they are selling. As if
it was a trade secret of considerable value (why bother, otherwise?)
I don't understand the thinking behind this. To whom are they trying to >avoid disclosing the information? Competitors? Customers??
Note that the obscured markings don't help with identifying the
actual physical connectors as they are only represented abstractly
or schematically. And, Vout/Iout would seem to WANT to be disclosed
so the customer is assured that these comply with the Vin/Iin
requirements often stated in the documentation for the device powered
by said adapter.
For 2-pin connectors (e.g., barrel), the "pinout" is almost always
"center positive" (in the US) so there's nothing to be gained by
obscuring THAT.
Are they afraid someone is going to BUY a connector and MAKE an
power supply, thus depriving them of ONE sale? Are they sure the
powered device doesn't already disclose the information they are
trying to suppress? Or, a competitor's product? Or, a forum??
It seems about as useful as blurring the size code on an
automobile tire and just claiming "Fits Lexus RX"
(as if they were the sole guardian of those "secrets"
and no one else knows ANYTHING about a Lexus RX!)
"Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:10v9en4$3fbfu$1@dont-email.me...
I rescue/repair/reuse/repurpose, a lot of kit. Many small
appliances have external power adapter.
And, those adapters often get separated from their associated
kit.
One can determine the type of mating connector required
by an examination of the power-inlet on the device.
And, the device will usually indicate actual power requirements
in some way or another. Often including polarity.
There is obviously an aftermarket for these power supplies
(warts/bricks).
Yet, invariably, the vendors go to extra lengths to remove any
similar indications ON the devices they are selling. As if
it was a trade secret of considerable value (why bother, otherwise?)
I don't understand the thinking behind this. To whom are they trying to
avoid disclosing the information? Competitors? Customers??
One reason may be marketing.
A good percentage of people who order the wrong item won't bother to return it.
Another reason might be an attempt to reduce the return rate for wrong items.
A good percentage of people have no understanding of how to match
a power adapter with a specific piece of equipment and no understanding
of what may happen if you connect a 12V adapter to a 5V port.
So it's best to leave that to those who can actually measure the V and
check the polarity and make sure there is enough A.
Then those who get it wrong can't make silly claims like I didn't see
why 12V would be a problem for a 5V device because it was the
correct connector so I'm suing you for $$$ for damaging my equipment.
Note that the obscured markings don't help with identifying the
actual physical connectors as they are only represented abstractly
or schematically. And, Vout/Iout would seem to WANT to be disclosed
so the customer is assured that these comply with the Vin/Iin
requirements often stated in the documentation for the device powered
by said adapter.
For 2-pin connectors (e.g., barrel), the "pinout" is almost always
"center positive" (in the US) so there's nothing to be gained by
obscuring THAT.
I recall an individual who wouldn't let me get a https://www.google.com/search?q=roland+ep7
working in minutes rather than days because you have to use the
correct adapter. Cutting wires to reverse the polarity is not allowed.
(It has positive outer).
Are they afraid someone is going to BUY a connector and MAKE an
power supply, thus depriving them of ONE sale? Are they sure the
powered device doesn't already disclose the information they are
trying to suppress? Or, a competitor's product? Or, a forum??
It seems about as useful as blurring the size code on an
automobile tire and just claiming "Fits Lexus RX"
(as if they were the sole guardian of those "secrets"
and no one else knows ANYTHING about a Lexus RX!)
How about cordless power tools and the idea of making a
simpled corded adapter so that at some future point it's
simple to keep the tool running even if the battery manufacturer
has moved on yet AC mains is still a thing?
These days it seems that the cordless tool manufacturers
are simply using "USB charging" or a similar protocol.
Some cordless tool manufacturers do offer a corded adapter,And, the corded adapter has to ensure it can make available the
or Ridgid does, and various owners of the tools have reverse
engineered the protocols, and made their own.
I rescue/repair/reuse/repurpose, a lot of kit.ÿ Many small
appliances have external power adapter.
And, those adapters often get separated from their associated
kit.
One can determine the type of mating connector required
by an examination of the power-inlet on the device.
And, the device will usually indicate actual power requirements
in some way or another.ÿ Often including polarity.
There is obviously an aftermarket for these power supplies
(warts/bricks).
Yet, invariably, the vendors go to extra lengths to remove any
similar indications ON the devices they are selling.ÿ As if
it was a trade secret of considerable value (why bother, otherwise?)
I don't understand the thinking behind this.ÿ To whom are they trying to avoid disclosing the information?ÿ Competitors?ÿ Customers??
Note that the obscured markings don't help with identifying the
actual physical connectors as they are only represented abstractly
or schematically.ÿ And, Vout/Iout would seem to WANT to be disclosed
so the customer is assured that these comply with the Vin/Iin
requirements often stated in the documentation for the device powered
by said adapter.
For 2-pin connectors (e.g., barrel), the "pinout" is almost always
"center positive" (in the US) so there's nothing to be gained by
obscuring THAT.
Are they afraid someone is going to BUY a connector and MAKE an
power supply, thus depriving them of ONE sale?ÿÿ Are they sure the
powered device doesn't already disclose the information they are
trying to suppress?ÿ Or, a competitor's product?ÿ Or, a forum??
It seems about as useful as blurring the size code on an
automobile tire and just claiming "Fits Lexus RX"
(as if they were the sole guardian of those "secrets"
and no one else knows ANYTHING about a Lexus RX!)
I hate the new 'universal ' barrel plugs/sockets from Asia... they 'claim' to
be universal 2.1/2.5 mm. IME they're utter crap. Plugging a universal plug into
a 2.1 socket it will fall out with the slightest of pressure- e.g socket on the
bottom of a wall mounted device, plug plugs in from below. Weight of cable means it's totally unreliable and likely to fall out onter it's own weight. Only solution, it seems, is to throw away my 2.1 sockets and replace with 2.5
version. Then all my legacy wall warts that are 2.1 are bin jobs...bummer
On 5/28/2026 3:20 PM, TTman wrote:
I hate the new 'universal ' barrel plugs/sockets from Asia... they 'claim' to
be universal 2.1/2.5 mm. IME they're utter crap. Plugging a universal plug into
a 2.1 socket it will fall out with the slightest of pressure- e.g socket on the
bottom of a wall mounted device, plug plugs in from below. Weight of cable >> means it's totally unreliable and likely to fall out onter it's own weight. >> Only solution, it seems, is to throw away my 2.1 sockets and replace with 2.5
version. Then all my legacy wall warts that are 2.1 are bin jobs...bummer
Some of my devices use a barrel connector that has small "wings";
plug in, rotate 90 degrees and the "wings" prevent it from
being removed, accidentally.
About the *only* thing barrel connectors have going for them
(from a user's perspective) is they mate easily -- assuming you
already have the correct partner!
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 494928:14:45 |
| Calls: | 162 |
| Files: | 568 |
| D/L today: |
14 files (349K bytes) |
| Messages: | 74,957 |