did ahk@chinet.com deliver unto us this message:
You shifted gears again. If there's a lack of evidence and
documentation, then why is anybody obliged to find it sleazy and decide >>they don't want to support his art? The reverse is also true. Why should >>anyone support him?
I'm not really using a gear, just responding to what you're saying.
Support him or don't, as you please. Am I assuming he's guilty? No, but
the story seemed credible and was being investigated seriously. At this >point, he looks guilty to me.
You said there was no crime. That may be so, but some people might still >find his actions distasteful enough to lead them to give up his work.
This is the relevance of his popularity already having waned. It's
easier to drop an artist we kind of like, or used to like, than one we >really like.
Are you a Gaiman fan, or are you coming at this more from a men's rights >angle? My main reservation is that people love to say bad things about >celebrities. This isn't just some wild rumor, though. It's a real case.
Ubiquitoius wrote:
thetruemelissa@gmail.com wrote:
weberm@polaris.net wrote:
Neil Gaiman's Scandal DESTROYED Good Omens And The Reviews PROVE It!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmRF8OohEk0
The show tanked during S2. It's no coincidence that this was when they >>>decided to make the two main characters into a gay couple.
Were those allegations ever proven? At this point, I am assuming
it's another pound MeToo thing.
You mean the Neil Gaiman ones? I don't think anyone has hard evidence,
but Gaiman has essentially admitted it by being vague and cagey, then
going silent.
"Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
arthur@alum.calberkeley.org wrote:
On 5/16/2026 9:26 AM, The True Melissa wrote:
Ubiquitous wrote:
What did you watch?
Nothing interesting.
Obsession (theatrical) New horror movie written and directed by Curry
Barker. The film follows a young man who buys a novelty toy that grants >>> the buyer one wish. As it turns out it works, but with a monkey's paw
effect. The young man wishes that a woman he likes would love him more >>> than anyone else. She then becomes obsessed with him in ways that I
can't say due to spoilers.
What's there to spoil? This is a trope from the original Twilight Zone.
"The Monkey's Paw" has been around a lot longer than THE TWILIGHT ZONE.
I've enjoyed a few things and have disliked others.
Are you never going to watch his two Doctor Who-scripted episodes again?
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 494928:20:52 |
| Calls: | 162 |
| Files: | 568 |
| D/L today: |
14 files (349K bytes) |
| Messages: | 74,957 |