https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/592865/time-to-do-something-about-supermarkets-consumer-says?cid=newsletterYep crazy. No doubt Consumer NZ and Com Com will be right behind it.
So their policy is to compel Foodstuffs (a co-operative of retail
outlet owners to be broken up, trampling on the property rights of New
World, Paknsav and 4 Square owners, while allowing the
Australian-owned Woolworths to continue untouched.
What unhinged idiots think that this would be a good idea?
Perhaps the Godfather and the Matua don't like them.
Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:It defies logic for me.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/592865/time-to-do-something-about-supermarkets-consumer-says?cid=newsletterYep crazy. No doubt Consumer NZ and Com Com will be right behind it.
So their policy is to compel Foodstuffs (a co-operative of retail
outlet owners to be broken up, trampling on the property rights of New >>World, Paknsav and 4 Square owners, while allowing the
Australian-owned Woolworths to continue untouched.
What unhinged idiots think that this would be a good idea?
Perhaps the Godfather and the Matua don't like them.
Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:It defies logic for me.
Yep crazy. No doubt Consumer NZ and Com Com will be right behind it.https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/592865/time-to-do-something-about-supermarkets-consumer-says?cid=newsletter
So their policy is to compel Foodstuffs (a co-operative of retail
outlet owners to be broken up, trampling on the property rights of New >>>World, Paknsav and 4 Square owners, while allowing the
Australian-owned Woolworths to continue untouched.
What unhinged idiots think that this would be a good idea?
Perhaps the Godfather and the Matua don't like them.
So their policy is to compel Foodstuffs (a co-operative of retail outlet owners to be broken up, trampling on the property rights of New World, Paknsav and 4 Square owners, while allowing the Australian-owned
Woolworths to continue untouched.
What unhinged idiots think that this would be a good idea?
On 2026-04-21, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:It defies logic for me.
Yep crazy. No doubt Consumer NZ and Com Com will be right behind it.https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/592865/time-to-do-something-about-supermarkets-consumer-says?cid=newsletter
So their policy is to compel Foodstuffs (a co-operative of retail >>>>outlet owners to be broken up, trampling on the property rights of New >>>>World, Paknsav and 4 Square owners, while allowing the
Australian-owned Woolworths to continue untouched.
What unhinged idiots think that this would be a good idea?
Perhaps the Godfather and the Matua don't like them.
Instead of taking on three, you attack, the other two, then you attack the >remaining one, having weakened the the group of three,
On 22 Apr 2026 08:14:33 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2026-04-21, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:It defies logic for me.
Yep crazy. No doubt Consumer NZ and Com Com will be right behind it.https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/592865/time-to-do-something-about-supermarkets-consumer-says?cid=newsletter
So their policy is to compel Foodstuffs (a co-operative of retail >>>>>outlet owners to be broken up, trampling on the property rights of New >>>>>World, Paknsav and 4 Square owners, while allowing the >>>>>Australian-owned Woolworths to continue untouched.
What unhinged idiots think that this would be a good idea?
Perhaps the Godfather and the Matua don't like them.
Instead of taking on three, you attack, the other two, then you attack the >>remaining one, having weakened the the group of three,
Not sure what you are referencing here. There is currently a
supermarket duopoly - Foodstuffs (a co-operative of store owners) and Woolworths (owned by the Australian company of the same name).
NZ First policy is unbalanced and unhinged as I said in my original
post.
On 2026-04-25, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
On 22 Apr 2026 08:14:33 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Good point Crash. My point was that it maybe better/easier to take on a part >rather the the whole "pack".
On 2026-04-21, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
Yep crazy. No doubt Consumer NZ and Com Com will be right behind it. >>>> It defies logic for me.https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/592865/time-to-do-something-about-supermarkets-consumer-says?cid=newsletter
So their policy is to compel Foodstuffs (a co-operative of retail >>>>>>outlet owners to be broken up, trampling on the property rights of New >>>>>>World, Paknsav and 4 Square owners, while allowing the >>>>>>Australian-owned Woolworths to continue untouched.
What unhinged idiots think that this would be a good idea?
Perhaps the Godfather and the Matua don't like them.
Instead of taking on three, you attack, the other two, then you attack the >>>remaining one, having weakened the the group of three,
Not sure what you are referencing here. There is currently a
supermarket duopoly - Foodstuffs (a co-operative of store owners) and
Woolworths (owned by the Australian company of the same name).
NZ First policy is unbalanced and unhinged as I said in my original
post.
Winston's proposal is certainly somewhat illocial and will be seen as not
the most reasoned.
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 496007:21:21 |
| Calls: | 178 |
| Files: | 605 |
| D/L today: |
7 files (18,398K bytes) |
| Messages: | 70,062 |