Hello folks,Is there a specific reason to use nouveau driver?
I saw another issue that seems to point to mesa and nouveau,
On 7/1/26 00:12, Boyan Penkov wrote:upport and having stability issues.
Hello folks,
I saw another issue that seems to point to mesa and nouveau,
Is there a specific reason to use nouveau driver?
It always performed like a Proof-of-Concept for me, lacking in hardware s
Your VGA (Quadro K2200 is it?) is supported by proprietary Nvidia driver,so my suggestion is to install it from Debian repo and see if your stabili
This way you will also check if VGA itself is working fine and doesn't have any hardware defects, which could be hidden and be the source of sporadi
--
With kindest regards, Alexander.
Debian - The universal operating system
https://www.debian.org
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 4:44\u202fPM Alexander V. Makartsev <avbetev@gmail.com> wrote:It is either supported or not. It looks like [1] the version 580.xx will
On 7/1/26 00:12, Boyan Penkov wrote:Hello Alexander -- yes, fair point, and I don't know how
Hello folks,
I saw another issue that seems to point to mesa and nouveau,
Is there a specific reason to use nouveau driver?
It always performed like a Proof-of-Concept for me, lacking in hardware support and having stability issues.
Your VGA (Quadro K2200 is it?) is supported by proprietary Nvidia driver, so my suggestion is to install it from Debian repo and see if your stability issues go away.
This way you will also check if VGA itself is working fine and doesn't have any hardware defects, which could be hidden and be the source of sporadic stability issues.
unconventional my decision is here, but this card is getting
increasingly old, barely supported by the official driver,
and I don'tIf something will happen with the new 6.12.xx kernel update and
want to have to mess with guessing which Nvidia driver update will
finally fail to boot period
(https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#data-center-d13), so IThe choice is yours of course, but getting a stable and performant
am steering away from nvidia-driver.
So my guiding light here is for this machine, forget the proprietary
driver and use the FOSS one, but this seems to have shot me in the
foot...
wrote:ail.com> wrote:
That's the thing -- I'm on stable-bpo, which has linux 7.0, and the
module did not compile out of the gate for me when I tried the update.
Either way, I'd rather anticipate the problem of getting off
nvidia-driver now on this machine.
Cheers!
On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 1:50?AM Alexander V. Makartsev <avbetev@gm
support and having stability issues.On 7/1/26 06:30, Boyan Penkov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 4:44?PM Alexander V. Makartsev
<avbetev@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/1/26 00:12, Boyan Penkov wrote:
Hello folks,
I saw another issue that seems to point to mesa and nouveau,
Is there a specific reason to use nouveau driver?
It always performed like a Proof-of-Concept for me, lacking in hardware
r, so my suggestion is to install it from Debian repo and see if your stabi lity issues go away.Your VGA (Quadro K2200 is it?) is supported by proprietary Nvidia drive
have any hardware defects, which could be hidden and be the source of sporaThis way you will also check if VGA itself is working fine and doesn't
l be the final version for your VGA.Hello Alexander -- yes, fair point, and I don't know how
unconventional my decision is here, but this card is getting
increasingly old, barely supported by the official driver,
It is either supported or not. It looks like [1] the version 580.xx wil
rsion 550.xx should give you the time until the next Debian release, whichVersion 550.xx, which is available for Debian stable [2], supports it.
If you are on Trixie and use kernel version 6.12, then nvidia-driver ve
driver DKMS module would fail to compile, you will know about it from the c onsole output.and I don't
want to have to mess with guessing which Nvidia driver update will
finally fail to boot period
If something will happen with the new 6.12.xx kernel update and nvidia-
ou will still have access to tty1 (Ctrl+Alt+F1) console and the way to sortEven if you ignore the errors and reboot to the black screen on tty7, y
em for at least two years, until the next Debian stable release, seems like(https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#data-center-d13), so I
am steering away from nvidia-driver.
So my guiding light here is for this machine, forget the proprietary
driver and use the FOSS one, but this seems to have shot me in the
foot...
The choice is yours of course, but getting a stable and performant syst
2[1] https://www.nvidia.com/en-eu/drivers/details/273196/
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#Debian_13_.22Trixie.2
--
With kindest regards, Alexander.
Debian - The universal operating system
https://www.debian.org
--
Boyan Penkov
On 7/1/26 06:30, Boyan Penkov wrote:upport and having stability issues.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 4:44?PM Alexander V. Makartsev
<avbetev@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/1/26 00:12, Boyan Penkov wrote:
Hello folks,
I saw another issue that seems to point to mesa and nouveau,
Is there a specific reason to use nouveau driver?
It always performed like a Proof-of-Concept for me, lacking in hardware s
Your VGA (Quadro K2200 is it?) is supported by proprietary Nvidia driver,so my suggestion is to install it from Debian repo and see if your stabili
This way you will also check if VGA itself is working fine and doesn't have any hardware defects, which could be hidden and be the source of sporadi
Hello Alexander -- yes, fair point, and I don't know howbe the final version for your VGA.
unconventional my decision is here, but this card is getting
increasingly old, barely supported by the official driver,
It is either supported or not. It looks like [1] the version 580.xx will
Version 550.xx, which is available for Debian stable [2], supports it.ion 550.xx should give you the time until the next Debian release, which is
If you are on Trixie and use kernel version 6.12, then nvidia-driver vers
and I don'tiver DKMS module would fail to compile, you will know about it from the con sole output.
want to have to mess with guessing which Nvidia driver update will
finally fail to boot period
If something will happen with the new 6.12.xx kernel update and nvidia-dr
Even if you ignore the errors and reboot to the black screen on tty7, youwill still have access to tty1 (Ctrl+Alt+F1) console and the way to sort i
(https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#data-center-d13), so Ifor at least two years, until the next Debian stable release, seems like a
am steering away from nvidia-driver.
So my guiding light here is for this machine, forget the proprietary
driver and use the FOSS one, but this seems to have shot me in the
foot...
The choice is yours of course, but getting a stable and performant system
[1] https://www.nvidia.com/en-eu/drivers/details/273196/
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#Debian_13_.22Trixie.22
--
With kindest regards, Alexander.
Debian - The universal operating system
https://www.debian.org
[180647.705506] gnome-shell[2390]: segfault at 565800000000 ip 00007f800dc42e3d sp 00007ffddcd54880 error 4 in libgallium-26.1.2-1.so[c42e3d,7f800d0e2000+19ab000] likely on CPU 22[...]
(core 6, socket 0)
That's the thing -- I'm on stable-bpo, which has linux 7.0, and the
module did not compile out of the gate for me when I tried the update.
Either way, I'd rather anticipate the problem of getting off
nvidia-driver now on this machine.
wrote:
Le 02/07/2026 … 23:55, Boyan Penkov a ‚crit :
(...]
[180647.705506] gnome-shell[2390]: segfault at 565800000000 ip 00007f800dc42e3d sp 00007ffddcd54880 error 4 in libgallium-26.1.2-1.so[c42e3d,7f800d0e2000+19ab000] likely on CPU 22[...]
(core 6, socket 0)
That's the thing -- I'm on stable-bpo, which has linux 7.0, and the
module did not compile out of the gate for me when I tried the update.
Either way, I'd rather anticipate the problem of getting off
nvidia-driver now on this machine.
Hello,
didier@hp-notebook14:~$ apt-file search libgallium # (trixie+backports repositories here):
mesa-libgallium: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgallium-25.0.7-2+deb13u1.so mesa-libgallium: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgallium-25.0.7-2.so mesa-libgallium: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgallium-25.2.6-1~bpo13+1.so [...]
I would suggest to investigate your apt sources because libgallium-26.1.2-1.so on your system does not seem to be present in trixie+backports repos...
apt-policy mesa-libgallium should indicate where this package come from:
didier@hp-notebook14:~$ LANG=en-US.UTF-8; apt policy mesa-libgallium mesa-libgallium:
Installed: 25.0.7-2+deb13u1
Candidate: 25.0.7-2+deb13u1
Version table:
25.2.6-1~bpo13+1 100
100 https://deb.debian.org/debian trixie-backports/main amd64 Packages
*** 25.0.7-2+deb13u1 500
500 https://deb.debian.org/debian trixie-proposed-updates/main
amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
25.0.7-2 500
500 https://deb.debian.org/debian trixie/main amd64 Packages
The issue presents itself on both libgallium 25 from Trixie and
libgallium 26 from testing.
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 497102:17:41 |
| Calls: | 182 |
| Files: | 744 |
| D/L today: |
59 files (9,737K bytes) |
| Messages: | 73,647 |