• Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ?

    From R.Wieser@3:633/10 to All on Tuesday, April 28, 2026 14:39:14
    Hello all,

    I've just disabled my phones caller-ID (using instructions found on the
    web), but would like to know if its possible to switch it on *for the
    current call only*.

    In my country I can /disable/ the caller-ID for the current call only by prefixing the phone number with #31#, but could not find if it would perhaps act in the reverse when the caller-ID is already disabled...

    Or better yet, is there a similar-but-different prefix (#30# or alike) which will re-enable the caller-ID for the current call (so I can prefix the phone-numbers in my list of contacts with them - and not have to remove them when I re-enable the caller-ID again.) ?

    Does anyone have some experience with the above and can tell ?

    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/10 to All on Tuesday, April 28, 2026 08:54:15
    "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> wrote:

    I've just disabled my phones caller-ID (using instructions found on
    the web), but would like to know if its possible to switch it on *for
    the current call only*.

    In my country I can /disable/ the caller-ID for the current call only
    by prefixing the phone number with #31#, but could not find if it
    would perhaps act in the reverse when the caller-ID is already
    disabled...

    Or better yet, is there a similar-but-different prefix (#30# or
    alike) which will re-enable the caller-ID for the current call (so I
    can prefix the phone-numbers in my list of contacts with them - and
    not have to remove them when I re-enable the caller-ID again.) ?

    <Side issue of being anonymous>
    You'll get your anonymous calls often if not usually blocked. When
    Caller-ID is disabled (for your outbound calls), you are seen as
    Anonymous. If a recipient blocks Anonymous callers, you won't get
    through. Anonymous callers can be blocked, or immediately redirected to voicemail. In either case the recipient's phone will not ring when you
    call them.
    </Side issue>

    [Vertical] service codes aka feature access codes are not univeral.
    What works at one telco may be a different code at a different telco, or
    not have an equivalent code at the other telco. Sometimes you can find
    a list of their codes either at their website, or mentioned somewhere
    online. You could call their customer service to find out if they will
    divulge their codes. If you are using an MVNO (Mobile Virtual Network Provider; e.g., Tracfone), they don't define the service codes, and
    you'll have to check with whomever they assigned to you as your real
    telco. You could try a web search on "<telco> service codes" or
    "<telco> feature codes".

    If you have an online account with your telco, log into it to see if
    they have user-configurable options regarding anonymous calling. If
    using an MVNO, they are very unlikely to list the feature codes since
    that depends on who is the actual telco to which they assigned you.

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From David Oseas@3:633/10 to All on Tuesday, April 28, 2026 09:55:05
    On 4/28/2026 5:39 AM, R.Wieser wrote:
    Hello all,

    I've just disabled my phones caller-ID (using instructions found on the
    web), but would like to know if its possible to switch it on *for the
    current call only*.

    In my country I can /disable/ the caller-ID for the current call only by prefixing the phone number with #31#, but could not find if it would perhaps act in the reverse when the caller-ID is already disabled...

    Or better yet, is there a similar-but-different prefix (#30# or alike) which will re-enable the caller-ID for the current call (so I can prefix the phone-numbers in my list of contacts with them - and not have to remove them when I re-enable the caller-ID again.) ?

    Does anyone have some experience with the above and can tell ?


    In North America: for current call, *82 enables Caller ID whereas *85
    disables (doesn't show) it. Both perform their function regardless of
    what the default status of your line is.

    Yes, these two prefixes can be entered into a contact's number so they
    are dialed every time.

    See the topic "Vertical service code" on Wikipedia or similar.

    -David

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Carlos E.R.@3:633/10 to All on Tuesday, April 28, 2026 20:22:16
    On 2026-04-28 15:54, VanguardLH wrote:
    "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> wrote:

    I've just disabled my phones caller-ID (using instructions found on
    the web), but would like to know if its possible to switch it on *for
    the current call only*.

    In my country I can /disable/ the caller-ID for the current call only
    by prefixing the phone number with #31#, but could not find if it
    would perhaps act in the reverse when the caller-ID is already
    disabled...

    Or better yet, is there a similar-but-different prefix (#30# or
    alike) which will re-enable the caller-ID for the current call (so I
    can prefix the phone-numbers in my list of contacts with them - and
    not have to remove them when I re-enable the caller-ID again.) ?

    <Side issue of being anonymous>
    You'll get your anonymous calls often if not usually blocked. When
    Caller-ID is disabled (for your outbound calls), you are seen as
    Anonymous. If a recipient blocks Anonymous callers, you won't get
    through. Anonymous callers can be blocked, or immediately redirected to voicemail. In either case the recipient's phone will not ring when you
    call them.
    </Side issue>

    Absolutely.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ES??, EU??;

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From R.Wieser@3:633/10 to All on Tuesday, April 28, 2026 21:14:57
    David,

    In North America: for current call, *82 enables Caller ID whereas
    *85 disables (doesn't show) it

    Thats a part of the problem : Although I could find, for my country, the
    code to *disable* caller-ID for a single call (#31#), I cant seem to find
    the number to *enable* it for a single call.

    The other part is that I've disabled caller-ID by way of a configuration setting in my android, not by using a a phone-number prefix. iow, I'm not
    at all sure that that configuration setting can be overridden by a phone-number prefix.

    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From R.Wieser@3:633/10 to All on Tuesday, April 28, 2026 21:30:40
    VanguardLH,

    When Caller-ID is disabled (for your outbound calls), you are
    seen as Anonymous. If a recipient blocks Anonymous callers,
    you won't get through.

    Ding, ding, ding, ding! You win a prize!

    Yes, thats exactly why I want to enable my caller-id for certain special phone-numbers.

    [Vertical] service codes aka feature access codes are not univeral.

    Yep. I got reminded of it when I found a list with similar, but different codes for a number of countries.

    If you have an online account with your telco,

    As far as I can tell that is not something my telco offers.

    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/10 to All on Tuesday, April 28, 2026 19:09:51
    "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> wrote:

    VanguardLH,

    When Caller-ID is disabled (for your outbound calls), you are seen as
    Anonymous. If a recipient blocks Anonymous callers, you won't get
    through.

    Ding, ding, ding, ding! You win a prize!

    So, why call them anonymously in the first place knowing there's a good
    chance they will block you, or immediately redirect you to voicemail?
    Just call only the recipients that you do want to talk to.

    Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this.
    Doctor: Don't do that.

    Yes, thats exactly why I want to enable my caller-id for certain
    special phone-numbers.

    [Vertical] service codes aka feature access codes are not univeral.

    Yep. I got reminded of it when I found a list with similar, but
    different codes for a number of countries.

    I use Verizon through an MVNO (Tracfone, acquired later by Verizon).
    Verizon's feature codes are listed at:

    https://www.verizon.com/support/pound-star-codes/

    They list:

    *67 + 10-digit phone number Block Caller ID for a single call
    *82 + 10-digit phone number Unblock Caller ID for a single call

    That Verizon has the unblock feature code does not mean your telco has a similar feature code. The unblock code assumes they provide a user-configurable option to send or not send your Caller-ID by default.

    I'm not sure that feature code list is complete. For example, I thought
    *69 would dial the phone number of whomever last called you.

    https://www.whichvoip.com/articles/feature-codes.htm

    That lists some other feature codes. You could play with the feature
    codes to see which work with whomever is your telco.

    I don't know who is your telco or cellular provider to see if I could
    find a list of their feature codes. They may have a list available
    online, at their website, or you call them for help.

    If you have an online account with your telco,

    As far as I can tell that is not something my telco offers.

    If you do not have an online account with your telco, I don't see how
    you can access user-configurable options on your account, like disabling Caller-ID on outbound calls by default.

    You're paying them, so they should have phone support. While you can
    find some feature codes listed online, their tech support should know
    which ones they use.

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From R.Wieser@3:633/10 to All on Wednesday, April 29, 2026 09:53:43
    VanguardLH,

    When Caller-ID is disabled (for your outbound calls), you are seen
    as Anonymous. If a recipient blocks Anonymous callers, you won't
    get through.

    Ding, ding, ding, ding! You win a prize!

    So, why call them anonymously in the first place knowing there's a good chance they will block you,

    Kiddo, in the sentence just below what you quoted there I mentioned that I wanted to be able to provide caller-id to people /of my choice/.

    So yes, I'm rather aware that some people will block anonymous callers. Interesting enough though, I do not know of any company which will do so.

    They list:

    *67 + 10-digit phone number Block Caller ID for a single call

    I already mentioned that my country uses #31# for that. Do you really think that your countries codes will be in any way usefull to me ?

    If you do not have an online account with your telco, I don't see how
    you can access user-configurable options on your account,

    Well duh! If you do not have {something} you cannot use {something}. And water is wet. <whistle>

    like disabling Caller-ID on outbound calls by default.

    I think you missed that I already did that, courtesy of my phone / android.
    No telco assist needed.

    When are you going to try to answer my question ?

    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/10 to All on Wednesday, April 29, 2026 06:14:13
    "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> wrote:

    VanguardLH,

    *67 + 10-digit phone number Block Caller ID for a single call
    *82 + 10-digit phone number Unblock Caller ID for a single call

    I already mentioned that my country uses #31# for that. Do you really think that your countries codes will be in any way usefull to me ?

    Unidentified telco or cellular provider.
    Unidentified country.

    Oh, this information is supposed to somehow get divined by your
    respondents?

    I showed what I found for one provider. In keeping everything secret,
    now it's your turn to investigate, or just call them to get the codes.

    When are you going to try to answer my question ?

    No more responses from me until you choose to stop secreting the
    requisite information as to WHO and WHERE you are a customer of.
    EVERYONE else will also be making stabs at solutions doling out similar information for whomever they use and wherever that is.

    Keep the info a secret, and you really expected specific solutions to
    the unknown? The country where your provider is far less important than
    the actual provider you use.

    Since you want to keep secret who that is, good luck when calling THEM
    on if they support what you want.

    Bye.

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From R.Wieser@3:633/10 to All on Wednesday, April 29, 2026 14:54:39
    Vanguard,

    I already mentioned that my country uses #31# for that. Do you
    really think that your countries codes will be in any way usefull
    to me ?

    Unidentified telco or cellular provider.

    Not relevant in my nick of the woods. Our telcos' don't get to choose their own user-centric phone codes.

    Unidentified country.

    Not relevant. I've provided you with the format my country uses, and an eventually existing "temporarily re-enable caller-id" code will be in that same format.

    Oh, this information is supposed to somehow get divined
    by your respondents?

    :-) For some reason you are rather good at ignoring information that has already been provided. Why is that ?

    I showed what I found for one provider. In keeping everything
    secret,

    :-) See the above. None of what you asked for is relevant to my question. And no, not even my country.

    If you think otherwise than show me some user-centric phone codes in the
    same format as #31#, but with a different meaning for different countries.

    now it's your turn to investigate, or just call them to get the codes.

    Well, for me investigating myself *before* posting a question is pretty-much
    a given. I did not find anything relevant.


    And you missed a big part of my initial post (something I specifically named in a following post) : I mentioned that I disabled caller-id *using the configuration of the phone*. I have no idea if such phone codes can
    override that setting.

    ... something you have not even considered.

    No more responses from me

    You say that as if its some kind of punishment. :-)


    To say it again : you ask for information you don't actually need, while ignoring the information you already got. Thats not a good combination.

    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Carlos E.R.@3:633/10 to All on Wednesday, April 29, 2026 19:46:17
    On 2026-04-29 14:54, R.Wieser wrote:
    Vanguard,

    I already mentioned that my country uses #31# for that. Do you
    really think that your countries codes will be in any way usefull
    to me ?

    Unidentified telco or cellular provider.

    Not relevant in my nick of the woods. Our telcos' don't get to choose their own user-centric phone codes.


    Huh, I don't believe so.

    Vanguard is right.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ES??, EU??;

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From R.Wieser@3:633/10 to All on Wednesday, April 29, 2026 21:39:01
    Carlos,

    I already mentioned that my country uses #31# for that. Do you
    really think that your countries codes will be in any way usefull
    to me ?

    Unidentified telco or cellular provider.

    Not relevant in my nick of the woods. Our telcos' don't get to choose
    their
    own user-centric phone codes.

    Huh, I don't believe so.

    Which part of it ? Also, how are you supporting that belief ?

    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.14
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)