https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/
keithr0 <me@bugger.off.com.au> wrote:
https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/04/analysis-finds-google-ai-overviews-is-wrong-10-percent-of-the-time/This reveals how little reasoning and cross-checking really goes on
when these AIs answer questions:
Scientists invented an obviously fake illness, and AI spread it
like truth within weeks https://www.osnews.com/story/144787/scientists-invented-an-obviously-fake-illness-and-ai-spread-it-like-truth-within-weeks/
This seems to be the fact some people here can't get their head
around:
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit. "AI" output understands the world about as much as the
pachinko ball does, and as such, can't pick up on even the most
obvious of cues that something is a fake or a forgery."
Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
This seems to be the fact some people here can't get their head
around:
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit. "AI" output understands the world about as much as the
pachinko ball does, and as such, can't pick up on even the most
obvious of cues that something is a fake or a forgery."
interesting. but if they can't 'think' how do/can they write essays?
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit.
Just did this one, https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
"This shouldn't come as a surprise. After all, "AI" tools have no
understanding, no intelligence, no context, and they can't actually
make sense of anything. They are glorified pachinko machines with
the output - the ball - tumbling down the most likely path between
the pins based on nothing but chance and which pins it has already
hit.
Just did this one,
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ff894a2f-e630-4557-92e9-435a87b51d91
That result is nothing even remotely like what you would
get from a glorified pachinko machine and yes I got that
question from that news item in the ABC Just In feed and
didnt get as useful a result from google
I get this page from a brewery by searching for "handles of beer"
with Duck Duck Go, which contradicts the "425-450mL" range given
in your AI answer
The grok response accurately points out that
the volume varys with the location, fuckwit
ans disputes that it's the same as a schooner in the NT:
https://stoneandwood.com.au/blogs/all/our-guide-to-australias-beer-sizes-and-names
"The Northern Territory's beer sizes
Pity we arent discussing the NT, fuckwit
| Sysop: | Jacob Catayoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pasay City, Metro Manila, Philippines |
| Users: | 6 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 493396:47:10 |
| Calls: | 141 |
| Files: | 538 |
| Messages: | 76,285 |